تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

بررسی پایداری ژنوتیپ‌های زیره سبز از لحاظ صفات کیفی با استفاده از روش‌های آماری چندمتغیره

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، کرج، ایران
2 بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی جیرفت، سازمان تحقیقات، ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، جیرفت، ایران
3 بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی ، سازمان تحقیقات، ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، مشهد، ایران
4 بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان جنوبی، سازمان تحقیقات، ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، بیرجند، ایران
5 بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی سیستان، سازمان تحقیقات، ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، زابل، ایران
چکیده
ایران یکی از تولید‌کنندگان پیشرو زیره سبز در جهان است، اما تاکنون رقم اصلاح‌شده‌ای در کشور به کشاورزان معرفی نشده است. برای معرفی ارقام جدید زیره سبز بررسی تنوع ژنتیکی و اثرات متقابل ژنوتیپ و محیط و پایداری تولید اهمیت فراوانی دارد. بدین منظور آزمایشی با هدف بررسی پایداری درصد اسانس و عملکرد اسانس 36 ژنوتیپ زیره سبز در ایستگاه‌های تحقیقات کشاورزی چهار منطقه (جیرفت، مشهد، بیرجند و کرج) در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا شد. در این آزمایش صفات درصد اسانس و عملکرد اسانس اندازه‌گیری شدند. نتایج تجزیه AMMI نشان داد، اثرمتقابل ژنوتیپ در محیط برای هر دو صفت معنی‌دار و نسبت قابل‌توجهی از واریانس (درصد اسانس: 45/61، عملکرد اسانس: 23/33) را به‌خود اختصاص داد. براساس تجزیه GGE بای‌پلات مشخص شد که ژنوتیپ‌های شماره 22، 25، 31 و 10 ژنوتیپ‌های ایده‌آل از لحاظ صفت درصد اسانس می‌باشند. از لحاظ عملکرد اسانس ژنوتیپ‌های شماره 30 و 25 نزدیک‌ترین ژنوتیپ‌ها به ژنوتیپ ایده‌آل بودند. گیاه زیره سبز به‌خاطر مصارف دارویی و ادویه‌ای لازم است درعین عملکرد بالا، درصد اسانس بالایی نیز داشته باشند. در این آزمایش مشخص شد ژنوتیپ‌های دارای بالاترین عملکرد اسانس، از هر دو ویژگی عملکرد و اسانس بالا برخوردارند، بنابراین ژنوتیپ‌های شماره 30 و 25 به‌عنوان ایده‌آل‌ترین ژنوتیپ‌ها مشخص شدند و می‌توان از آن‌ها در برنامه‌های معرفی ارقام و یا در برنامه‌های به‌نژادی به‌عنوان والد استفاده کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the stability of cumin genotypes in terms of qualitative traits using multivariate statistical methods

نویسندگان English

Hamidreza Fanaei 1
Seid Mohammad Alavi-Siney 2
Behzad Laleloo 1
Majid Reza Kiani Freez 3
Ali Eftekhari 4
Abolfazl Moradgholi 5
Mani Marefatzadeh- Khameneh 3
Hossein AkbariMoghadam 5
1 Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
2 Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Southern Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Jiroft, Iran
3 Horticulture-Crops Research Department, Khorasan Razavy Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Mashhad, Iran
4 Horticulture-Crops Research Department, South Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Birjand, Iran
5 Horticulture-Crops Research Department, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Zabol, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.), belonging to the family Apiaceae, is one of the most well-known aromatic spices in the world. Iran is also one of the leading producers of cumin globally, but no improved cultivar has yet been introduced to farmers in the country. To introduce new cumin cultivars, it is essential to understand genetic diversity, desirable traits, genotype-environment interactions, and production stability, given the varied climatic conditions across regions. When genotypes are evaluated in different environments, their performance compared to each other varies across environments. A genotype may exhibit the highest yield in some environments, while other genotypes may outperform it in other environments. This variation in the relative performance of genotypes across different environments is referred to as genotype-by-environment interaction (G×E). G×E interaction is a critical issue in plant breeding and plays a significant role in the release and introduction of improved genotypes. The objective of this study was to analyze G×E interactions using AMMI (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction) and GGE (Genotype + Genotype-by-Environment) biplot methods to evaluate genotypes, environments, and their relationships, ultimately identifying ideal cumin genotypes with high essential oil percentage and essential oil yield.
Materials and Methods: To assess the stability of essential oil percentage and essential oil yield in 36 cumin genotypes, an experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications at four agricultural research stations (Jiroft, Mashhad, Birjand, and Karaj) during the 2022-2023 growing season. Seeds of each genotype were sown on two ridges, with two rows per ridge (each 3 meters long, totaling 4 rows), and a row spacing of 20 cm. At the end of the growing season, plants were harvested at maturity, dried, threshed, and the seeds were separated from the straw. The essential oil percentage was measured using a Clevenger apparatus, and the essential oil yield was calculated by multiplying the seed yield per unit area by the essential oil percentage.
After verifying the assumptions of ANOVA, AMMI, and GGE biplot analyses were performed for essential oil percentage and essential oil yield using GenStat software (Version 12).
Results and Discussion: The results of the combined analysis of variance for the four locations indicated that the effects of environment, genotype, and genotype × environment interaction were highly significant (at the 1% probability level) for both essential oil percentage and essential oil yield traits. Due to the significance of the genotype × environment interaction, the interaction effect was analyzed using AMMI and GGE biplot methods. The genotype × environment interaction analysis revealed that, regarding essential oil percentage, genotype No. 17 exhibited high specific adaptability to Birjand and Jiroft environments. Additionally, genotypes No. 27 and 11 showed high specific adaptability to Karaj and Mashhad regions, respectively. For essential oil yield, genotype No. 27 demonstrated high specific adaptability to the Karaj region, while genotypes No. 3 and 4 were most suitable for the Jiroft region, and genotype No. 30 performed optimally in the Mashhad and Birjand regions. Based on the GGE biplot analysis, genotypes No. 22, 25, 31, and 10 were identified as ideal genotypes for essential oil percentage. For essential oil yield, genotypes No. 30 and 25 were the closest to the ideal genotype. These genotypes can be recommended as parental lines in breeding programs or as superior cultivars for farmers. Given the importance of cumin in medicinal and spice applications, it is essential to have both high yield and high essential oil percentage. The genotypes with the highest essential oil yield possessed both characteristics. Therefore, genotypes No. 30 and 25 were identified as the most ideal genotypes and can be utilized as parents in breeding programs or introduced as new cultivars.
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that genotypes No. 22, 25, 31, and 10 were the most ideal for essential oil percentage. For essential oil yield, genotypes No. 30 and 25 were the closest to the ideal genotype. Considering the significance of cumin in medicinal and spice uses, which requires high yield and high essential oil content, the genotypes with the highest essential oil yield that exhibited both traits were recognized as the most suitable. Thus, genotypes No. 30 and 25 are considered the most ideal genotypes and can be introduced to farmers as stable genotypes with high essential oil percentage and yield. Furthermore, their potential can be effectively exploited as parental lines in breeding programs.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

AMMI
Essential oil percentage
Essential oil yield
GGE biplot
Allahgholipour, M., 2016. Genotype × environment interaction effect in rice genotypes using GGE Biplot. Cereal Research. 6, pp.1-14. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22124/c.2016.3680
Alavi-Siney, S.M. and Fanaei, H.R., 2025. Evaluation and selection of superior cumin ecotypes through quantitative and qualitative traits via multivariate methods under Jiroft climatic conditions. Crop Science Research in Arid Regions6(4), pp.257-275. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.22034/csrar.2024.430131.1387
Alavi-Siney, S.M., Yoneszadeh, R., Abasi, A., Aien, A. and Fanaei, H., 2024. The stability of seed yield in cumin ecotypes in different planting dates using multivariate methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 16(2), pp.80-92. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.61186/jcb.16.2.80
Alizadeh, A., Tavousi, M., Inanlou, M. and Nasiri, M.M., 2005. Effect of irrigation regimes on yield and yield components of cumin. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research,2(3), pp.35-42. [In Persian].
Annicchiarico, P., 1997. Joint regression vs AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interactions for cereals in Italy. Euphytica, 94, pp.53-62.
Arshadi, A., Karami, A.E., Sartip, A., Zare, M. and Rezabakhsh, P., 2018. Genotype performance in relation to drought tolerance in barley using multi-environment trials. Agronomy Research, 16(1), pp.5–12. https://doi.org/10.15159/ar.18.004
Bagheri, M., Hasanzadeh Khankahdani, H., Anafjeh, Z. and Arab-Salmani, K., 2021. Evaluation of stability and compatibility of yield in advanced lines of Iranian long eggplants. Journal of Vegetables Sciences5(9), pp.125-137. http://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2021.531273.1163
Enyew, M., Feyissa, T., Geleta, M., Tesfaye. K., Hammenhag, C. and Carlsson, A.S., 2021. Genotype by environment interaction, correlation, AMMI, GGE biplot and cluster analysis for grain yield and other agronomic traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). PLoS ONE, 16(10), e0258211.  http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258211
Esmaeilzadeh Moghadam, M., Dastfal, M., Tabib Ghaffary, S.M., Anderzian, S.B.A., Sayyahfar, M., Miri, K., Shirali Koohkan, Sh. and Askari Kalestani, A., 2024. Stability analysis of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes by the genotype × genotype-environment biplot. Journal of Crop Breeding. 16(3), pp.13-24. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.61186/jcb.16.3.13
Fanaei, H., Akbari Moghadam, H., Keigha, G., Ghaffarie, M. and Alli, E., 2006. Evaluation of agronomy and essential oil components of Cuminum cyminum L., Foeniculum vulgare Mill. and Nigella sativa L. in the condition of Sistan region. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research22(1), pp.34-41. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.22092/ijmapr.2006.114998
Ghanbari, J., Khajoei-nejad, G.R. and Mohammadinejad, G., 2017. Study of ecotype and sowing date interaction in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) using different univariate stability parameters. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research15(1), pp.87-102. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v15i1.43232
Ghodrati Niari, F. and Abdolshahi, R., 2015. Evaluation of yield stability of 40 bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16(4), pp.322-333. [In Persian].
Gholizadeh, A. and Khodadadi, M., 2023. Graphic analysis of genotype, environment and genotype × environment interaction for oil yield in coriander. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences16(2), pp.277-289. http://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2022.4491.2029
Gholizadeh, A., Khodadadi, M. and Sharifi-Zagheh, A., 2022. Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction for essential oil yield of coriander genotypes under different irrigation conditions using GGE biplot method. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 15(1), pp.43-52. http://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2020.3574.1878
Gondaliya, S.B., Khatrani, T.J., Soni, K.K. and Baravalia, Y.K., 2018. Consequence on long term storage on phytochemical attributes of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) from districts of north Gujarat, India. Industrial Crops and Products, 111, pp.908-913. http://doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.054
Hajlaoui, H., Mighri, H., Noumi, E., Snoussi, M., Trabelsi, N., Ksouri, R. and Bakhrouf, A., 2010. Chemical composition and biological activities of Tunisian Cuminum cyminum L. essential oil: A high effectiveness against Vibrio spp. Strains. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48, pp.2186-2192. http://doi:10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.044
Hashemian, N., Pirbalouti, A.G., Hashemi, M., Golparvar, A. and Hamedi, B., 2013. Diversity in chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) Diverse from Northeast of Iran. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7(11), pp.1752-1760.
Hassani, M., HAMZE, H. and Mansouri, H., 2023. Compatibility and stability of new rhizomania-resistant multigerm hybrids in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production33(1), pp.113-128. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2022.49322.2787
Hemayati, S.S., Hamdi, F., Saremirad, A. and Hamze, H., 2024. Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis for harvest date in sugar beet cultivars. Scientific Reports14, pp.1-12.
http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67272-7
Jafari, T. and Farshadfar, E., 2018. Stability analysis of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) by GGE biplot. Cereal Research, 8, pp.199- 208. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.22124/c.2018.6232.1243
Jat, M.L., Jat, R.K., Singh, P., Jat, S.L., Sidhu, H.S., Jat, H.S., Bijarniya, D., Parihar, C.M. and Gupta, R., 2017. Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agroecosystems in India. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, pp.1977–2012. http://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.88133
Ministry of Agricultural-Jihad (MAJ)., 2023. Communications and Information Technology Center. Available at website http://amar.maj.ir/. [In Persian].
Moghaddam, M. and Ghasemi Pirbalouti, A., 2017. Agro-morphological and phytochemical diversity of Iranian Cuminum cyminum accessions. Industrial Crops and Products, 99, pp.205-213. http://doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.02.003
Parthasarathy, V.A., Chempakam, B. and Zachariah, T.J., 2008. Chemistry of Spices. CABI, Oxford, UK. 464 PP.
Qasemi, S.H., Mostafavi, K., Khosroshahli, M., Bihamta, M.R. and Ramshini, H., 2022. Genotype and environment interaction and stability of grain yield and oil content of rapeseed cultivars. Food Science and Nutrition10(12), pp.4308–4318. http://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3023
Raiger, H.L. and Prabhakaran, V.T., 2001. A study on the performance of a few non-parametric stability measures using pearl-millet data. Indian Journal of Genetics, 61, pp.7-11.
Sharif, I., Aleem, S., Junaid, J.A., Aleem, M., Jamshaid, K., Saleem, H., Rizwan, M., Chohan, S.M., Sohail, S., Akram, S. and Zeeshan, M., 2025. Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction and yield stability of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes under heat stress conditions. Journal of Crop Health, 77(16), pp.1-12. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-024-01079-4
Shiri, M.R. and Bahrampour, T., 2015. Genotype× environment interaction analysis using GGE biplot in grain maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under different irrigation conditions. Cereal Research. 5, pp.83-94. [In Persian].
Shiri, M., Moharramnejad, S., Estakhr, A., Fareghi, S., Najafinezhad, H., Khavari Khorasani, S., Afarinesh, A., Anvari, K., Eshraghi-Nejad, M. and Mohseni, M., 2024. Determining the stability of new maize hybrids with WAASBY and MTSI Indices. Journal of Crop Breeding16(2), pp.14-28. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.61186/jcb.16.2.14
Sowbhagya, H., 2013. Chemistry, technology, and nutraceutical functions of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.): An overview. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 53(1), pp.1-10. http://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.500223
Tahir, M., Aleem, S., Munawar, M., Parveen, N., Amin, E., Aslam, R., Saeed, A. and Najeebullah, M., 2020. GGE biplot: an effective tool to study genotype and genotype× environment interaction; a case study in onion (Allium cepa L.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 57, pp.1565–1571. http://doi.org/10.21162/pakjas/20.9919
Torres Filho, J., Oliveira, C.N.G.S., Silveira, L.M., Nunes, G.H.S., Silva, A.J.R. and Silva, M.F.N., 2017. Genotype by environment interaction in green cowpea analyzed via mixed models. Revista Caatinga, 30, pp.687–697. http://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252017v3 0n317rc
Yan WeiKai, Y.W. and Hunt, L., 2002. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data. In quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding (pp.289-303). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Woods, S. and Cornelius, P.L., 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype by environment data. Crop Science, 47(2), pp.643-653.

  • تاریخ دریافت 31 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 10 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 13 خرداد 1404