تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

اثرات تنش شوری بر ویژگی‌های مورفولوژیکی، فیزیولوژیکی و بیوشیمیایی برگ و ریشه در مرحله رویشی دو رقم لوبیا قرمز (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
گروه زیست شناسی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران
چکیده
شوری یکی از مهم‌ترین تنش‌هاست که بر متابولیسم سلولی گیاه تأثیر می‌گذارد و بهره‌وری گیاه را کاهش می‌دهد. در این مطالعه، تغییرات محتوای آب نسبی برگ، شاخص‌های رشد و برخی ویژگی‌های فیزیولوژیکی و بیوشیمیایی در ریشه و برگ دو رقم لوبیا قرمز (افق و KS31285) تحت تنش شوری (50، 100 و 200 میلی مولار) به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با سه تکرار مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که محتوای آب نسبی برگ و شاخص‌های رشد در هر دو رقم کاهش پیدا کرد، ولی میزان کاهش در رقم KS31285 نسبت به رقم افق بیشتر بود که این عامل نشان‌دهنده تحمل شوری بالای رقم افق می‌باشد. میزان قند کل، قند احیاءکننده و پرولین در هر دو رقم افزایش یافت، البته میزان تجمع پرولین در رقم KS31285 نسبت به رقم افق بیشتر بوده است. این امر می‌تواند به‌دلیل حساسیت بیشتر رقم  KS31285به تنش شوری باشد. با افزایش سطح شوری میزان رنگیزه‌های فتوسنتزی (کلروفیل a و کاروتنوئیدها) کاهش و میزان مالون‌دی‌آلدئید و پراکسید‌هیدروژن افزایش یافت که مقدار این تغییرات در رقم KS31285 نسبت به رقم افق بیشتر بوده است. همچنین در رقم افق نسبت به رقم KS31285 در برگ، مقدار سدیم کمتر و مقدار پتاسیم بیشتر می‌باشد. در مجموع می‌توان گفت که رقم افق به واسطه داشتن شاخص‌های رشدی، محتوای آب نسبی برگ و تجمع بیشتر قند کل، احیاء و افزایش پتاسم برگ و سدیم ریشه تحمل نسبی خوبی نسبت به رقم KS31285 از خود نشان داده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Effects of salinity stress on morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of leaf and root during vegetative growth of two cultivars of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

نویسندگان English

Nasrin Shirzadi
Maryam Nasr Esfahani
Seifollah Bahramikia
Hamed Khodayari
Department of Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Salinity is one of the most significant abiotic stresses that affects the metabolism of plant cells and reduces their productivity. High levels of salinity trigger ionic imbalance and osmotic stress in plants, which has severe effects on the morphology, biomass and biochemical processes of plants and ultimately leads to plant damage. Red bean with the scientific name Phaseolus vulgaris L. belongs to the family of legumes (Fabaceae) can be grown annually in temperate climates or perennially in tropical climates. It has been proven by various studies that up to 20% of bean production in the Middle East is wasted due to salinity. The most sensitive stage of bean plant to salt stress is during seed germination and the beginning of seedling growth. Regarding the high level of bean cultivation in Iran and the high sensitivity of this plant to salinity, identification of bean varieties resistant and sensitive to salinity helps to solve the cultivation of this plant in saline areas. Therefore, in this study, in order to identify red bean cultivars tolerant to salt stress, the effect of different levels of salt stress (concentrations of 50, 100 and 200 mM NaCl) on physiological and biochemical characteristics in the roots and leaves of two cultivars of red beans (Ofogh and Ks31285) was investigated.
Material and Methods: This research was conducted on two bean cultivars (Ofogh and Ks31285) obtained from Khomein Agricultural Research Center. The present study was conducted in the biology laboratory of Lorestan University in the year 1400. The bean seeds (Ks31285 and Ofogh) were surface sterilized (5.5% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes) for rapid germination and planted in 1.5 Liter pots containing perlite for two weeks in the cultivation room. The pots (two plants in each pot) were watered for about a week, and after a week until the fourteenth day, semi-Hoogland nutrient solution was added to the plant culture medium every other day. Salinity stress was applied at three levels of 50, 100 and 200 mM. After the end of this time period, morphological, biochemical and physiological indicators such as growth parameters (plant height, fresh and dry weight of aerial and terrestrial organs), the amount of chlorophylls and carotenoids, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), lipid peroxidation (MDA), some osmolytes (reduced and soluble carbohydrates, proline) and the content and ratio of Na+ and K+ were measured. SPSS version 16 statistical software was employed to analyze data. Duncan's test (P ≤ 0.05) was used to compare the mean results of different treatments, and graphs were drawn using Excel software.
Results and discussion: The results showed that leaf RWC and growth indices decreased in both cultivars, but the amount of decrease in cultivar Ks31285 was higher than that of Ofogh cultivar, which indicates the high salinity tolerance of the cultivar. In addition, the results indicate that total sugar, reducing sugar and proline have increased in both cultivars, but, the amount of proline in Ks31285 was higher than Ofogh. On the other hand, as the salinity level increased, the amount of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a and carotenoids) decreased and the level of malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide increased. The amount of this change was higher in Ks31285 than in Ofogh. These results also showed that the Ofogh cultivar had lower sodium and higher potassium in its leaves than to which in Ks31285.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this research, the tolerance to salinity in the Ofogh cultivar compared to the Ks31285 cultivar is due to the lower concentration of Na+, the higher concentration of K+ in the leaves, the higher accumulation of reducing and total sugars and the decrease in the amount of MDA in the leaves and roots. The sum of these factors resulted in increased growth indices (plant height, fresh and dry weight of aerial and terrestrial organs) and RWC, in the Ofogh cultivar, when compared to Ks31285 at all salinity levels. Despite the higher salinity tolerance of the Ofogh cultivar, the concentration of proline in it was lower than that of the sensitive Ks31285 cultivar.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Growth indicators
Osmolytes
Oxidative stress
Relative Water Content
Abdelrhim, A.S., Mazrou, Y.S., Nehela, Y., Atallah, O.O., El-Ashmony, R.M. and Dawood, M.F., 2021. Silicon dioxide nanoparticles induce innate immune responses and activate antioxidant machinery in wheat against Rhizoctonia solani. Plants, 10, 2758. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122758
Alavi, S.L. and Abbaspour, N., 2020. Evaluation of salt (NaCl) tolerance in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivars. Journal of Horticulture and Postharvest Research, 3, pp.53–66. https://doi.org/10.22077/jhpr.2020.2738.1084
Albalasmeh, A.A., Berhe, A.A. and Ghezzehei, T.A., 2013. A new method for rapid determination of carbohydrate and total carbon concentrations using UV spectrophotometry. Carbohydrate Polymers, 97, pp.253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.072
Alexieva, V., Sergiev, I., Mapelli, S. and Karanov, E., 2001. The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Plant, Cell & Environment, 24, pp.1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00778.x
Al-Karaki, G.N., 1998. Response of wheat and barley during germination to seed osmopriming at different water potential. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 181, pp.229–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037x.1998.tb00422.x
Alzahrani, S.M., Alaraidh, I.A., Migdadi, H., Alghamdi, S., Khan, M.A. and Ahmad, P., 2019. Physiological, biochemical, and antioxidant properties of two genotypes of Vicia faba grown under salinity stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 51, pp.786–798. https://doi.org/10.30848/pjb2019-3(3)
Ansari, M., Shekari, F., Mohammadi, M., Végvári, G. and Biró, B., 2019. Effect of irrigation with saline water on ion homeostasis and forage dry yield in alfalfa ecotypes. Desert, 24, pp.1–12. https://doi.org/10.22059/jdesert.2019.72430
Bagheri, K.A. and Sarmadnia, G., 2007. Studying ability to use polyethylene glycol 6000 to study dryness in (Onobrychis viciifolia). Agriculture Resources and Science Magazine, 5(1), pp.1–9.
Barrs, H. and Weatherley, P., 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, pp.413–428. https://doi.org/10.1071/bi9620413
Bates, L., Waldren, R.A. and Teare, I., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39, pp.205–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00018060
Bayuelo-Jiménez, J.S., Craig, R. and Lynch, J.P., 2002b. Salinity tolerance of Phaseolus species during germination and early seedling growth. Crop Science, 42, pp.1584–1594. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1584
Bayuelo-Jiménez, J.S., Debouck, D.G. and Lynch, J.P., 2002a. Salinity tolerance in Phaseolus species during early vegetative growth. Crop Science, 42, pp.2184–2192. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.2184
Benhassaini, H., Fetati, A., Hocine, A.K. and Belkhodja, M., 2012. Effect of salt stress on growth and accumulation of proline and soluble sugars on plantlets of Pistacia atlantica Desf. subsp. atlantica used as rootstocks. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, 16(2), pp.159–165.
Dirgantara Namangboling, A. and Kesamai, N., 2023. The effect of red bean soup (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on hemoglobin levels of female students. International Journal of Nutrition Sciences, 8, pp.71–73. https://doi.org/10.30476/ijns.2023.98307.1231
El Kholy, R.I., Sayed, A., El-Shaer, H. and Hanafy, M.S., 2021. Impact of sea salt stress on growth and some physiological attributes of two soybean cultivars. Al-Azhar Journal of Agricultural Research, 46, pp.88–100. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajar.2021.245619
Gadallah, M., 1999. Effects of proline and glycinebetaine on Vicia faba responses to salt stress. Biologia Plantarum, 42, 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1002164719609
Hamada, A. and El-Enany, A., 1994. Effect of NaCl salinity on growth, pigment and mineral contents of broad bean and pea plants. Biologia Plantarum, 36, pp.75–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921273
Hasanuzzaman, M., Alam, M.M., Nahar, K., Ahamed, K.U. and Fujita, M., 2014. Exogenous salicylic acid alleviates salt stress-induced oxidative damage in Brassica napus. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 8, pp.631–639.
Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M.B., Zulfiqar, F., Raza, A., Mohsin, S.M., Mahmud, J.A., Fujita, M. and Fotopoulos, V., 2020. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress. Antioxidants, 9, 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681
Heath, R.L. and Packer, L., 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 125, pp.189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1
Islam, F., Wang, J., Farooq, M.A., Yang, C., Jan, M., Mwamba, T.M., Hannan, F., Xu, L. and Zhou, W., 2019. Rice responses and tolerance to salt stress. In Advances in rice research for abiotic stress tolerance (pp.791–819). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814332-2.00040-x
Kapoor, N. and Pande, V., 2015. Effect of salt stress on growth parameters, moisture content, relative water content and photosynthetic pigments of fenugreek cultivar RMt-1. Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, pp.210–221. https://doi.org/10.3923/jps.2015.210.221
Karimi, G., Ghorbanli, M. L., Heidari, H. and Asareh, M., 2007. Investigation of salt tolerance mechanisms in range species of Atriplex verrucifera. Pajouhesh-va-Sazandegi, 19(3), pp.42–48. [In Persian].
Kchaou, H., Larbi, A., Gargouri, K., Chaieb, M., Morales, F. and Msallem, M., 2010. Assessment of tolerance to NaCl salinity of five olive cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 124, pp.306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.007
Kosar, F., Akram, N.A., Ashraf, M., Ahmad, A., Alyemeni, M.N. and Ahmad, P., 2021. Impact of exogenously applied trehalose on sunflower under drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 172, pp.317–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13155
Kumar, S., Li, G., Yang, J., Huang, X., Ji, Q., Liu, Z., Ke, W. and Hou, H., 2021. Effect of salt stress on growth and physiology of water dropwort. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 660409. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.660409
Lichtenthaler, H.K. and Wellburn, A.R., 1983. Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls. Biochemical Society Transactions, 11, pp.591–592. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591
Maghsoumi Holasoo, S. and Pourakbar, L., 2014. Effects of salinity stress on wheat seedlings. Iranian Journal of Plant Biology, 6, pp.31–42. [In Persian].
Maighany, F. and Ebrahimzadeh, H., 2002. Effect of salinity stress on proline metabolism in wheat. Rostaniha, 3, pp.87–94.
Mbarki, S., Sytar, O., Cerda, A., Zivcak, M., Rastogi, A., He, X., Zoghlami, A., Abdelly, C. and Brestic, M., 2018. Strategies to mitigate salt stress effects on photosynthesis. In Salinity responses and tolerance in plants (Vol. 1, pp.85–136). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75671-4_4
Meriem, B.F., Kaouther, Z., Chérif, H., Tijani, M. and André, B., 2014. Effect of priming on coriander under salt stress. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 10, pp.84–109.
Mohamed, I.A., Shalby, N., Bai, C., Qin, M., Agami, R.A., Jie, K., Wang, B. and Zhou, G., 2020. Sodium chloride tolerance of Brassica napus. Plants, 9, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9010062
Mohammadi Noori, H., Jafari, S. and Mirab-balou, M., 2023. Population fluctuation of thrips in bean farms. Taxonomy and Biosystematics, 14, pp.77–92. [In Persian].
Morsali Aghajari, F., Darvishzadeh, R. and Razi, M., 2020. Sodium chloride stress in sunflower genotypes. Journal of Plant Molecular Breeding, 8, 10–20.
Narimani, T., Toorchi, M., Tarinejad, A., Mohammadi, S. and Mohammadi, H., 2020. Evaluation of barley under salinity stress. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 22, pp.1009–1021.
Noreen, Z. and Ashraf, M., 2009. Changes in antioxidant enzymes and some key metabolites in some genetically diverse cultivars of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 67, pp.395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.05.011
Okunlola, G.O., Olatunji, O.A., Akinwale, R.O., Tariq, A. and Adelusi, A.A., 2017. Pepper response to drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 224, pp.198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.020
Omae, H., Kumar, A., Egawa, Y., Kashiwaba, K. and Shono, M., 2005. Leaf water content and drought tolerance in snap bean. Plant Production Science, 8, pp.465–467. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.465
Rahneshan, Z., Nasibi, F. and Moghadam, A.A., 2018. Salinity stress in pistachio rootstocks. Journal of Plant Interactions, 13, pp.73–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2018.1424355
Ramaswamy, A. and Seeta, R., 2018. Salinity stress on sunflower seedlings. International Journal of Biological Research, 3, pp.70–75.
Ran, X., Wang, X., Huang, X., Ma, C., Liang, H. and Liu, B., 2022. Ion absorption in Salix matsudana under salt stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 860111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.860111
Reisi, R., Abooei Mehrizi, F. and Poustini, K., 2021. Bread wheat cultivars under salt stress. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 52, pp.229–240. [In Persian].
Saad-Allah, K.M., 2015. Sea salt stress in soybean cultivars. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology, 6, pp.1559–1571.
Sahin, U., Ekinci, M., Ors, S., Turan, M., Yildiz, S. and Yildirim, E., 2018. Salinity and drought effects on cabbage. Scientia Horticulturae, 240, pp.196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.016
Saqib, A.A.N. and Whitney, P.J., 2011. DNS reagent behaviour. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, pp.4748–4750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.013
Sarker, U. and Oba, S., 2020. Nutritional constituents of Amaranthus hypochondriacus. Scientific Reports, 10, pp.1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71714-3
Serrano, R., Mulet, J.M., Rios, G., Marquez, J.A., De Larrinoa, I.F., Leube, M.P., Mendizabal, I., Pascual-Ahuir, A., Proft, M. and Ros, R., 1999. Mechanisms of ion homeostasis during salt stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, pp.1023–1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/50.special_issue.1023
Shafeiee, M. and Ehsanzadeh, P., 2019. Salinity tolerance in fennel genotypes. Industrial Crops and Products, 132, pp.311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.02.042
Shaheen, S., Naseer, S., Ashraf, M. and Akram, N. A., 2013. Salt stress in eggplant. Journal of Plant Interactions, 8, pp.85–96.
Silambarasan, N. and Natarajan, S., 2014. Growth of halophytes under salinity. International Letters of Natural Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.56431/p-hj3dzr
Singh, A., Singh, R. and Kumar, S., 2008. Salinity in maize genotypes. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 13, pp.95–99.
Smirnoff, N., 1996. Function of ascorbic acid in plants. Annals of Botany, 78, pp.661–669. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0175
Smith, M.R., Veneklaas, E., Polania, J., Rao, I.M., Beebe, S.E. and Merchant, A., 2019. Drought impact on common bean yield. PLoS ONE, 14, e0217099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217099
Taïbi, K., Taïbi, F., Abderrahim, L.A., Ennajah, A., Belkhodja, M. and Mulet, J.M., 2016. Salt stress in Phaseolus vulgaris. South African Journal of Botany, 105, pp.306–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.03.011
Tavakoli, F., Vazan, S., Sorkheh, K. and Shakeri, E., 2016. Salinity stress in barley genotypes. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 6, pp.191–202. [In Persian].
Tejera, N., Soussi, M. and Lluch, C., 2006. Tolerance to salinity in chickpea. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 58, pp.17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.06.007
Turan, M.A., Turkmen, N. and Taban, N., 2007. Effect of NaCl on lentil plants. Journal of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2007.378.381
Uebersax, M.A., Cichy, K.A., Gomez, F.E., Porch, T.G., Heitholt, J., Osorno, J.M., Kamfwa, K., Snapp, S.S. and Bales, S., 2023. Dry beans as a vital component of sustainable agriculture. Legume Science, 5, e155. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.155
Wang, X., Liu, H., Yu, F., Hu, B., Jia, Y., Sha, H. and Zhao, H., 2019. Antioxidant defence in rice under drought stress. Scientific Reports, 9, pp.1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44958-x
Zhao, K.F. and Harris, P., 1992. Effects of iso-osmotic salt and water stresses. Journal of Plant Physiology, 139, pp.761–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0176-1617(11)81725-6
 
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 20 دی 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 27 فروردین 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 30 فروردین 1403