تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

اثر کم آبیاری، تاریخ کاشت و کودهای زیستی بر جمعیت باکتری خاک، درصد کلونیزاسیون ریشه، برخی صفات مورفولوژیک و عملکرد کینوا (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران
2 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران
3 گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران
چکیده
به‌منظور بررسی اثر کم‌آبیاری، تاریخ کاشت و کودهای زیستی بر جمعیت باکتری خاک، درصد کلونیزاسیون ریشه، برخی صفات مورفولوژیک و عملکرد کینوا، آزمایشی در مزرعه‌ای واقع در منطقه مغان استان اردبیل، در دو سال زراعی 1400-1398 در قالب طرح اسپلیت فاکتوریل بر مبنای طرح پایه بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا گردید. تیمارهای آزمایش، شامل آبیاری در سه سطح (آبیاری معمولی، قطع آبیاری در مرحله غنچه‌دهی و قطع آبیاری در مرحله پر شدن دانه) در کرت اصلی و ترکیب فاکتوریل تاریخ کاشت در سه سطح (5 مرداد، 20 مرداد و 5 شهریور) و سه نوع کود زیستی نیتروژن‌دار (تلقیح بذر با ازتوباکتر، تلقیح بذر با آزوسپیریلوم و تلقیح بذر با مخلوط ازتوباکتر و آزوسپیریلوم و شاهد (بدون تلقیح)) نیز در کرت‌های فرعی در نظر گرفته شدند. نتایج تجزیه مرکب داده‌ها نشان داد که کاربرد آبیاری معمولی با تاریخ کاشت 5 مرداد و تلقیح توام کود‌های زیستی باعث افزایش طول برگ و عملکرد پروتئین گردیده و بیشترین عرض برگ، تعداد شاخه در گل‌آذین، جمعیت باکتری خاک، درصد کلونیزاسیون ریشه و عملکرد دانه (3049/7 کیلوگرم بر هکتار) از تیمار آبیاری معمولی با تاریخ کاشت 20 مرداد و تلقیح توام کود‌های زیستی حاصل شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Effect of deficit irrigation, planting date and biofertilizers on soil bacteria population, root colonization, some morphological traits and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) yield

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Jabbari Oranj 1
Hossein Moghadam 2
Mohammad Reza Jahansouz 2
Ali Ahmadi 2
Babak Motesharezadeh 3
1 Ph.D. Graduated of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
3 Department of Soil Science Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: The most important problem that threatens food security of any country and the world is the lack of adequate water resources, so one of the ways to deal with this crisis is to use plants with low water requirements and high water use efficiency. Among the plants, we can name Quinoa, which is one of the plants that has been less studied and exploited in Iran. Since the planting date has the greatest impact on the physiological characteristics of the crop compared to other cropping treatments, so choosing the appropriate planting date can also create the greatest correlation between plant growth trends and climatic conditions. Undoubtedly, the use of biological fertilizers, in addition to the positive effects it has on all soil properties, is also economically, environmentally and socially fruitful and can be a suitable and desirable alternative to chemical fertilizers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the response to deficit irrigation, planting date and application of different biofertilizers in quinoa.
Materials and Methods: This experiment was carried out during two cropping years 2019 and 2020 in a farm located in Moghan region in Iran. In this experiment, Titicaca cultivar of quinoa was cultivated in the form of split factorial design based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. Experimental factors included irrigation at three levels (normal irrigation, irrigation termination at bud stage and termination at seed filling stage) as main plot and factorial combination of planting date at three levels including (27 July, 11 August and 27 August) and three types of Nitrogenous biological fertilizer (seed inoculation with Azotobacter, seed inoculation with Azospirillum and inoculation with a mixture of Azotobacter and Azospirillum and control (without inoculation)) were also considered in sub-plots. Leaf Length and leaf Width at the physiological maturity stage was measured by randomly selecting 10 plants using a ruler with millimeter accuracy. At the end of the growing season, the product of two middle planting lines with a length of 4 meters was harvested by observing the half-meter margin effect and after drying in a ventilated oven at 70 °C for 24 hours, grain yield was determined. Kjeldahl method was used to measure nitrogen concentration and the percentage of protein was calculated. Finally, protein yield was obtained from the product of protein percentage in seed yield. The soil bacterial population was determined based on the methods recommended and the gridline interest method was used to determine the root colonization percentage.
Experimental data were analyzed before analysis of variance for homogeneity of test errors through Bartlett test and then analyzed using SAS (9.2) software and comparison of means at 5% probability level using Duncan multi-range test.
Results and discussion: The results of this study showed that the yield of quinoa increases under the influence of irrigation, planting date and biofertilizers, which is consistent with the results of other researchers' research. Irrigation termination in seed filling stage has no statistically significant difference with normal irrigation treatment, so it can be desirable in water shortage conditions. In terms of the planting date, the 11th of August treatment had the highest seed yield, and the combined use of azotobacter and Azospirillum had a significant effect on the vegetative indices and seed yield of quinoa. Therefore, it seems that the use of bio-fertilizers is one of the best ways to achieve optimal performance, which in the long run can lead to a reduction in the need for chemical inputs in agricultural systems.
Conclusion: The results of this research showed that although normal irrigation with the planting date of 11 August and inoculation with Azotobacter and Azospirillum biofertilizers had the highest amount of studied traits, especially seed yield (3049.7 kg/ha), but with the treatment of irrigation termination in the filling stage with the planting date of 11 August and inoculation with biofertilizers was placed in a same statistical group. Therefore, in terms of the importance of water consumption, it can be said that in the conditions of limited water resources, the treatment of irrigation termination during the seed filling stage has the most favorable results. Investigating the studied traits showed the positive effect of the use of biofertilizers, especially the combined use of Azotobacter and Azospirillum in the studied traits. Hence, the combined use of biofertilizers due to their high ability to fix nitrogen and provide nutrients needed by plants such as phosphorus, potassium, siderophore production and iron solubilization, synthesis of phytohormones such as auxin, cytokinin, gibberellin and synthesis of enzymes that grow and affect the growth of the plant, it showed positive effects on the examined traits, especially the seed yield.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Azospirillum
Azotobacter
Seed inoculation
Seed yield
Abolhasani Zeraatkar, M., Lakzian, A., Haghnia, Gh., Astaraei, A. and Sarcheshme poor, M., 2008. The study of salt and drought tolerance of Sinorhizobium meliloti isolated from Kerman province. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 6(1), pp.1–10. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v6i1.1170
Ahamed, N.T., Singhal, R.S., Kulkarni, P.R., Kale, D.D. and Pal, M., 1996. Studies on Chenopodium quinoa and Amaranthus paniculatas starch as biodegradable fillers in LDPE films. Carbohydrate Polymers, 31(3), pp.157–160.
Amiryousefi, M. R., Tadayon, M. R. and Ebrahimi, R., 2020. Effect of chemical and biological fertilizers on some physiological traits, yield components and yield of quinoa plant. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 10(2), pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.47176/jcpp.10.2.209112
Angeli, V., Silva, P.M., Massuela, D.C., WaleedKhan, M., Hamer, A., Khajehei, F., Graeff-Honinger, S. and Piatti, C., 2020. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An overview of the potentials of the “Golden Grain” and socio-economic and environmental aspects of its cultivation and marketization. Foods, 9(2), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9020216
Bilalis, D., Kakabouki, I., Karkanis, A., Travlos, I., Triantafyllidis, V. and Hela, D., 2012. Seed and saponin production of organic quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) for different tillage and fertilization. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 40(1), pp.42–46. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4017400
Bois, J.F., Winkel, T., Lhomme, J.P., Raffaillac, J.P. and Rocheteau, A., 2006. Response of some Andean cultivars of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to temperature. Effects on germination, phenology, growth and freezing. European Journal of Agronomy, 25, pp.299-308.
Bvenura, C. and Kambizi, L., 2022. Future grain crops. In Future Foods, Academic Press, pp.81–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-91001-9.00032-3
Chen, M.M., Zhu, Y.G., Su, Y.H., Chen, B.D., Fu, B.J. and Marschner, P., 2006. Effects of soil moisture and plant interactions on the soil microbial community structure. European Journal of Soil Biology, 43, pp.31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.05.001
Dawood, M.G., 2018. Improving drought tolerance of quinoa plant by foliar treatment of trehalose. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 19(5), pp.245–254.
Elewa, T.A., Sadak, M.S. and Saad, A.M., 2017. Proline treatment improves physiological responses in quinoa plants under drought stress. Bioscience Research, 14(1), pp.21–33.
Emam, Y. and Pirasteh Anousheh, E., 2014. Farm and laboratory methods in agricultural sciences. Mashhad University Jihad Publications. [In Persian].
Estrella, D.A.R., 2008. Amino acid composition and nitrogen to protein conversation factors for three legumes and tow pseudo-cereals [Degree thesis]. Quito.
Fallah Nosratabad, A.R., 2013. Evaluation of relationships between soil properties and total bacteria and fungi in soils of Guilan. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainability, 2(2), pp.49–68. [In Persian].
FAO, (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations)., 2011. Quinoa; an acient crop to contribute to world food security. 63p.
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D.B.S.M.A. and Basra, S.M.A., 2009. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, pp.185–196. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
Gehring, C.A., Mueller, R.C. and Whitham, T.G., 2006. Environmental and genetic effects on the formation of ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal in cottonwoods. Oecologia, 149, pp.158–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0437-9
Gharineh, M.H., Bakhshandeh, A., Andarzian, B. and Shirali, M., 2019. Effects of sowing dates and irrigation levels on morphological traits and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in Khuzestan. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 50(3), pp.149–156. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2018.209566.654135
Gonzalez, A., Konishi, Y., Bruno, M., Valoy, M. and Prado, F.E., 2012. Interrelationships among seed yield, total protein and amino acid composition of ten quinoas (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars from two different agro-ecological regions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92, pp.1222–1229. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4686
Igalavithana, A.D., Lee, S.S., Nabeel Khan Niazi, N.K., Lee, Y.H., Kim, K.H., Park, J.H., Moon, D.H. and Ok, Y.S., 2017. Assessment of soil health in urban agriculture: Soil enzymes and microbial properties. Sustainability, 9, pp.1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020310
Itelima, J.U., Bang, W.J., Onyimba, I.A., Sila, M.D. and Egbere, O.J., 2018. Bio-fertilizers as key player in enhancing soil fertility and crop productivity: A review. Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 6(3), pp.73–83.
Jamali, S., Goldani, M. and Zeynodin, S.M., 2020. Evaluation the effects of periodic water stress on yield and water productivity on quinoa. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 13(6), pp.1687–1697. [In Persian].
Jacobsen, S.E., Liu, F. and Jensen, C.R., 2009. Does root-sourced ABA play a role for regulation of stomata under drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Scientia Horticulturae, 122(2), pp.281-287.
Jiriaie, M., Esfandiar, F. and Aynehband, A., 2014. Evaluation the some root traits of treated wheat with mycorrhiza and Azospirillum. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 4(1), pp.61–73.
Mahmoudzadeh, M., Rasouli Sadaghiani, M.H., Asgari Lajayer, H. and Sefidkon, F., 2016. Biochemical changes in terpenoids, essential oil content and yield in peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) under bacterial and fungal treatments under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions, 7(2), pp.151–162. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ejgcst.7.2.151
Mostafaee, M., Jami Al-Ahmadi, M., Salehi, M. and Shahidi, A., 2023. Investigation of physiological and yield characteristics of quinoa as affected by different levels of irrigation and plant density. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 21(1), pp.29–46. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/jcesc.2022.74044.1126
Patten, C.L. and Glick, B.R., 2002. The role of bacterial indoleacetic acid in the development of the plant root system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, pp.3795–3801.
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.8.3795-3801.2002
Phillips, J.M. and Hayman, D.S., 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55(1), pp.158–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1536(70)80110-3
Samadzadeh, A., Zamani, G. and Fallahi, H.R., 2020. Possibility of quinoa production under South-Khorasan climatic condition as affected by planting densities and sowing dates. Applied Field Crop Research, 33(1), pp.82–104. [In Persian].
Scanlin, L. and Lewis, K.A., 2017. Quinoa as a sustainable protein source: Production, nutrition, and processing. In S. Nadathur, J.P.D. Wanasundara, & L. Scanlin (Eds.), Sustainable protein sources (pp. 223–238). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-802778-3.00014-7
Sharpe, R.R., Harper, L.A., Giddens, J.E. and Langdale, G.W., 2001. Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen budget for conservation-tilled wheat. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 52, pp.1349–1398. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200050035x
Singh, M.P., Soni, K., Bhamra, R., and Mittal, R.K., 2022. Superfood: Value and need. Current Nutrition & Food Science, 18(1), pp.65-68. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573401317666210420123013
Spaepen, S. and Dobbelaere, S., 2011. Effects of Azospirillum brasilense indole-3-acetic acid production on inoculated wheat plants. Plant and Soil, 312, pp.15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9560-1
Venkatashwarlu, B., 2008. Role of bio-fertilizers in organic farming. In Organic farming in rain fed agriculture (pp. 85–95). Central Institute for Dry Land Agriculture, Hyderabad.
Wollum, A.G., 1982. Cultural methods for soil microorganisms. Journal of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2, pp.781–801. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c37
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 09 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 خرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 03 تیر 1403