تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

بررسی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه کلزا در الگوهای مختلف کشت با گلرنگ در شرایط کنترل و عدم کنترل علف‌های‌ هرز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، گرایش اکولوژی گیاهان زراعی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2 گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، گرایش فیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعی، دانشگاه علوم پایه مراغه، مراغه، ایران
3 گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، اکولوژی گیاهان زراعی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه مراغه، مراغه، ایران
4 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم و مهندسی باغبانی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ‏ایران
5 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه اکوفیزولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف بررسی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه کلزا (Brassica napus L.) در الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط با گلرنگ Carthamus tinctorius L.) ) در شرایط کنترل و عدم کنترل علف‌های ‌هرز به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا شد. در گیاه کلزا، بیشترین عملکرد بیولوژیکی (7990 کیلوگرم در هکتار) و عملکرد دانه (2786 کیلوگرم در هکتار) مربوط به تیمار کشت خالص کلزا با کنترل کامل علف‌های‌ هرز بود. کمترین عملکرد بیولوژیکی مربوط به تیمار کشت مخلوط افزایشی 100:50 (گلرنگ- کلزا) با 3865 کیلوگرم در هکتار بود. کمترین عملکرد دانه مربوط به ترکیب تیماری کشت مخلوط افزایشی 100:50 (گلرنگ- کلزا) با عدم کنترل علف‌های ‌هرز با میانگین 654/6 کیلوگرم در هکتار به‌دست آمد. بیشترین وزن هزار دانه در ترکیب تیماری کشت مخلوط جایگزینی 1:1 (گلرنگ- کلزا) با کنترل کامل علف‌های ‌هرز با میانگین 2/7 گرم به‌دست آمد. بیشترین تعداد خورجین در شاخه‌های اصلی (33/4) و فرعی (25/3) مربوط به ترکیب تیماری کشت مخلوط جایگزینی 2:1 (گلرنگ- کلزا) با کنترل کامل علف‌های ‌‌هرز به‌دست آمد. با توجه به نتایج مقایسه میانگین داده‌ها، بیشترین تعداد دانه در خورجین شاخه اصلی مربوط به ترکیب تیماری کشت مخلوط افزایشی 100:50 (گلرنگ- کلزا) با کنترل کامل علف‌های ‌‌هرز بود. بیشترین تعداد دانه در خورجین شاخه فرعی کلزا در ترکیب تیماری کشت خالص کلزا با کنترل کامل علف‌های‌‌ هرز با میانگین 22/3 به‌دست آمد. به‌طورکلی، این تحقیق تأکید می‌کند که انتخاب الگوی کشت مناسب و مدیریت مؤثر علف‌های ‌هرز می‌تواند به بهبود عملکرد و کیفیت دانه در گیاهان کمک کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the yield and yield components of canola (Brassica napus L.) in different patterns of intercropping with safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under weed control and non-control conditions

نویسندگان English

Jalil Shafagh- kolvanagh 1
Fariborz Shekari 2
Abdullah Jawanmard 3
Mina Amani 4
Zohreh Saeli-Ashan 5
1 Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Department of Crop Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Plant Genetics and Production Engineering, Crop Physiology Department, Maragheh University of Basic Sciences, Maragheh, Iran
3 Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Crop Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran
4 Ph.D. Student, Department of Horticultural Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
5 M. Sc. Graduate, Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: One of the most important factors reducing the yield of agricultural products is the competition from weeds. Weeds are considered as one of the complementary components of agricultural ecosystems and an integral part of agricultural systems. Due to the destructive effects caused by competition on the yield of crops, weeds are known as an undesirable part of agricultural ecosystems and are considered one of the most important factors that reduce crop yields. Weed control is usually listed as one of the advantages of intercropping. In mixed cultivation, due to various reasons such as increased vegetation cover, increased competition, and higher initial growth rate, the amount and invasion of weeds is significantly reduced. Therefore, mixed cropping can significantly reduce the amount of herbicides used, and this, in addition to the economic value, is of great environmental importance. In studies, mixed cropping system has been mentioned as an option for integrated management of weeds, especially in low-input farming systems. The most important damage caused by weeds to agricultural plants is the reduction of their yield through competition in the absorption of nutrients and growth inputs. One of the important measures in controlling weeds from the point of view of sustainable agriculture is the use of mixed crops of different crops. Therefore, according to the importance of intercropping in sustainable agriculture of crops and garden plants, this research aims to investigate the yield and yield components of canola (Brassica napus L.) in intercropping with safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under control and non-control conditions. 
Materials and methods: For this purpose, a factorial experiment was carried out in the form of a randomized complete block design with three replications in Maragheh city. The first factor includes weed control at two levels (control and non-control weed) and the second factor includes different patterns of mixed cropping at 4 levels, including mixed cropping replacing safflower and canola, respectively, with ratios of 1:1 and 2:1 and mixed cultivation of safflower and canola 100:50, 100:75 and pure cultivation of safflower and canola were considered.
Results and Discussion: In canola, the highest biological yield (7990 kg/ha) and seed (2786 kg/ha) related to pure canola treatment with complete weed control was observed. The lowest biological yield was related to the 100:50 mixed cropping treatment (safflower-canola) with 3865 kg. The lowest grain yield related to the treatment combination of 100:50 (safflower-canola) mixed cropping with non-control weed was obtained with an average of 654.6 kg/ha. The highest amount of 1000-seed weight was obtained in the treatment combination of 1:1 replacement mixed crop (safflower-canola) with complete weed control with an average of 2.7 gr. Also, the lowest amount of 1,000-seed weight was related to the treatment combination of 2:1 (safflower- canola) mixed cultivation with no weed control with 1.6 gr. The highest number of weeds was obtained in the main branches (33.4) and secondary branches (25.3) related to the treatment combination of 2:1 replacement mixed crop (safflower-canola) with complete weed control. Also, the lowest number of weeds in the main branch was related to the treatment combination of 100:75 (safflower-canola) with non-control weed with an average of 17.3, and the lowest number of weeds in the sub-branch was related to the 100:50 (safflower-canola) mixed cultivation with non-control weed with an average of 10 pods. According to the results of the average data comparison, the highest number of seeds in pod of the main branch was related to the treatment combination of 100:50 incremental mixed cultivation (safflower-canola) with full weed control, and the lowest number of seeds in pod of the main branch was related to the treatment combination of pure canola cultivation with non-control weed was obtained with an average of 15.4. Also, the highest number of seeds in the pod of the sub-branch of canola was obtained in the treatment combination of pure canola cultivation with complete weed control with an average of 22.3, and the lowest amount of seed number in the pod of the sub-branch related to the treatment combination of pure canola cultivation with non-control weed with an average of 15.
Conclusion: Among the different patterns of safflower and canola cultivation, the highest seed yield was obtained in pure cultivation and complete weed control. The yield and yield components in canola were affected by different patterns of mixed cropping and weed control treatment, so that the 2:1 planting pattern (safflower-canola) had more seeds and 1000-seed weight.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Biological yield
Grain yield
Pure cropping
Replacement mixed cropping
Sustainable agriculture
Abbasi Alikamar, R., Hejazi, A., Akbari, G.A., Kafi, M. and Zand, E., 2006. Study on different densities of cumin and chickpea intercropping with emphasis on weed control. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research4, pp.83-94. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v4i1.1320
Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A. and Sinebo, W., 2006. Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy, 25, pp.202-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.05.002
Al‐Thahabi, S.A., Yasin, J.Z., Abu‐Irmaileh, B.E., Haddad, N.I. and Saxena, M.C., 1994. Effect of weed removal on productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris Med.) in a Mediterranean environment. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 172, pp.333-341.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037x.1994.tb00184.x
Aziz, M., Mahmood, A., Asif, M. and Ali, A., 2015. Wheat-based intercropping: a review. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences25, pp.896-907.
Franco, J.G., King, S.R., Masabni, J.G. and Volder, A., 2015. Plant functional diversity improves short-term yields in a low-input intercropping system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 203, pp.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.018
Hamzei, J., 2012. Evaluation of yield, spad index, landuse efficiency and system productivity index of barley (Hordeum vulgare) intercropped with bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia). Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2, pp.79-92. [In Persian]. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22518517.1391.2.4.7.3
Hong, Y., Heerink, N., Zhao, M. and van der Werf, W., 2019. Intercropping contributes to a higher technical efficiency in smallholder farming: Evidence from a case study in Gaotai County, China. Agricultural Systems, 173, pp.317-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.007
Jahani Kondori, M., Koocheki, A. and Nasiri mahalati, M., 2008. Comparison of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and lentil (Lens culinaris). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research6, pp.67-78. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v6i1.1177
Kaur, N., Bhullar, M.S. and Gill, G., 2016. Weed management in sugarcane-canola intercropping systems in northern India. Field Crops Research188, pp.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.009
Lowry, C.J. and Smith, R.G., 2018. Weed control through crop plant manipulations. In Non-chemical weed control (pp.73-96). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809881-3.00005-x
Maitra, S., Hossain, A., Brestic, M., Skalicky, M., Ondrisik, P., Gitari, H. and Sairam, M., 2021. Intercropping-A low input agricultural strategy for food and environmental security. Agronomy11, pp.343. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020343
Maitra, S., Palai, J.B., Manasa, P. and Kumar, D.P., 2019. Potential of intercropping system in sustaining crop productivity. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 12, pp.39-45. https://doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.03.2019.7
Maitra, S., Shankar, T. and Banerjee, P., 2020. Potential and advantages of maize-legume intercropping system. Maize-Production and Use, pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91722
Maitra, S., Zaman, A., Mandal, T.K. and Palai, J.B., 2018. Green manures in agriculture: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7, pp.1319-1327.
Miao, Q., Rosa, R.D., Shi, H., Paredes, P., Zhu, L., Dai, J. and Pereira, L.S., 2016. Modeling water use, transpiration and soil evaporation of spring wheat–maize and spring wheat–sunflower relay intercropping using the dual crop coefficient approach. Agricultural Water Management, 165, pp.211-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.024
Pouramir, F., Nasiri mahalati, M., Koocheki, A. and Ghorbani, R., 2010. Assessment of Sesame and Chickpea Yield and Yield Components in the Replacement Series Intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 8, pp.747-757. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v8i5.8016
Rezaei-Chiyaneh, I., Tajbakhsh, M. and Fotohi Chiyaneh, S., 2015. Yield and yield components of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) in strip intercropping with ajowan (Carum copticum L.) influenced by bio and chemical fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production24, pp.1-15. [In Persian].
Rostaie, M., Falah, S. and Souraki, A., 2015. Effect of fertilizer sources on growth, yield and yield components of fenugreek intercropped with black cumin. Journal of Crop Production, 7, pp.222-197. [In Persian].  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2008739.1393.7.4.11.0
Shokati, B. and Zehtab-salmasi, S., 2014. Effect of different intercropping patterns on yield and yield components of dill and fenugreek. Azarian Journal of Agriculture, 1, pp.1-5.
Strickland, M.S., Leggett, Z.H., Sucre, E.B. and Bradford, M.A., 2015. Biofuel intercropping effects on soil carbon and microbial activity. Ecological Applications25, pp.140-150. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0285.1
Yilmaz, Ş., Özel, A., Atak, M. and Erayman, M., 2015. Effects of seeding rates on competition indices of barley and vetch intercropping systems in the Eastern Mediterranean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry39, pp.135-143. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1406-155

  • تاریخ دریافت 20 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 09 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 11 اسفند 1403