تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

اثر جهت ردیف کاشت، تراکم گیاهی و فاصله بین ردیف بر رشد و عملکرد ذرت (Zea mays L.) رقم سینگل کراس 704

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران
2 گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی ، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران
چکیده
جهت گیری مناسب و تنظیم فواصل ردیف های کاشت به عنوان روشی مدیریتی در افزایش عملکرد ذرت مطرح می باشد. این مطالعه در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه بیرجند در سال زراعی 1400 انجام شد. تیمارها شامل جهت کاشت (شمالی جنوبی و شرقی غربی)، تراکم ذرت (7/5، 10 و 12/5 بوته در متر مربع) و فاصله بین ردیف (35 و 70 سانتی‏متر) بود. به منظور ارزیابی اثر جهت ردیف کاشت، این اثر به صورت اثر مکان در دو مزرعه جداگانه در نظر گرفته و دو عامل تراکم و فاصله بین ردیف به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‏های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار ترکیب شدند. نتایج نشان داد جهت کاشت شمالی جنوبی باعث افزایش معنی دار ارتفاع گیاه و شاخص سطح برگ گردید؛ افزایش شاخص سطح برگ در این جهت کاشت منجر به افزایش درصد جذب تشعشع گردید. فاصله بین ردیف 35 سانتی متر منجر به افزایش شاخص سطح برگ، عملکرد بیولوژیک و عملکرد دانه شد که این افزایش عملکرد عمدتاً در نتیجه جذب تشعشع بیشتر در این فاصله ردیف بود. تأثیر تراکم نیز بر ارتفاع گیاه، عملکرد علوفه تر، طول بلال، تعداد ردیف دانه، تعداد دانه در ردیف، تعداد کل دانه و وزن هزار دانه معنی دار بود و در بالاترین میزان منجر به کاهش تمامی صفات به جز ارتفاع و عملکرد علوفه تر گردید. در مجموع، ایجاد شرایط بهتر جذب تشعشع در جهت کاشت شمالی جنوبی منجر به رشد بهتر بوته های ذرت و افزایش عملکرد دانه و بیولوژیک شد؛ هم چنین سیستم کاشت در فاصله ردیف 35 سانتی‌متر می تواند به عنوان یک راهکار زراعی در افزایش عملکرد ذرت به کشاورزان توصیه شود.  
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Effect of row orientation, crop density, and row distance on growth and yield of corn (Zea mays L.) single cross 704 cultivar

نویسندگان English

Bahareh Tahmsbi 1
Seyed Vahid Eslami 2
Majid Jami Al Ahmadi 2
Sohrab Mahmoodi 2
1 PhD Candidate, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
2 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Corn (Zea mays L.) is one of the oldest agricultural plants, which has a special place among agricultural products due to its favorable characteristics, such as high adaptation to climatic conditions, high production of dry matter, and high water use efficiency. The high production potential of corn and its importance in feeding livestock and poultry, as well as the variety of products obtained from corn, have caused this plant to attract the attention of many countries in the world. Management practices can affect the growth and yield of maize. One practice used to increase yield has been to adjust the proper planting orientation and spacing between maize rows. Proper distribution and orientation of the corn plant during planting allows the canopy to absorb more light and thus increases vegetative growth and grain yield.
Materials and Methods: To investigate the effect of row orientation, crop density, and row distance on corn (Zea mays L.) growth and yield, a study was conducted at the experimental field of Birjand University during 2021. Treatments included row orientation (north-south and east-west), corn density (7.5, 10, and 12.5 plants per square meter), and row distance (35 and 70 cm). In order to evaluate the effect of row orientation, this effect was considered as the effect of location in two adjacent fields, and the two factors of density and row distance in each field were done as a factorial layout based on a randomized complete block design in three replications. Sampling of plants was done in 5 stages of 21 days after emergence. In each of these stages, 3 plants were randomly harvested from one-third of each plot, observing the margin effect, and characteristics such as leaf surface index and dry weight of aerial organs were measured. To measure the morphological traits, including plant height, 5 plants from each plot were randomly selected and marked after the plants were fully established, and their stem length was measured every 21 days using a ruler in centimeters. It was taken; Then their average was calculated in each plot. To determine the percentage of light interception (LI%), the amount of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was measured using a radiometer between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. In each case, 10 measurements were taken from below the canopy and in different directions (to calculate the light transmitted through the canopy), and two measurements were taken from above the canopy (to measure the total radiation reaching the canopy surface). After physiological processing, biomass and grain yield were measured.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that north-south planting orientation significantly increased plant height and leaf area index. The increase in leaf area index in this row direction led to an increase in the light interception (LI%). The row spacing of 35 cm led to an increase in leaf area index, biological yield, and grain yield; in fact, this increase in yield was the result of greater LI% in this row spacing. The effect of density was also significant on plant height, fresh forage yield, ear length, number of grain rows, number of grains per row, total grain number, and 1000 grain weight, and at the highest level it led to a decrease in all traits except height and fresh forage yield.
Conclusion: The north-south planting row direction in the Birjand region led to the superiority of plant height, LI%, and leaf area index compared to the east-west planting row direction. Narrow row spacing increased leaf area index, biological yield, grain yield, and LI% compared to conventional row spacing. Low density significantly increased yield components, including ear length, number of grain rows, number of grains per row, total grain number, and 1,000-grain weight. With increasing plant density, LI% also increased; this is due to the increase in the number of leaves and leaf area per unit area, which allows plants to utilize more light radiation. Overall, according to the results of this study, better light conditions in the north-south planting direction led to better growth of corn plants and increased biomass and grain yield; also, the planting system in 35 cm row spacing can be recommended to farmers as an agricultural solution to increase corn yield.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Growth parameters
Leaf area index
Light interception (%)
Plant arrangement
Plant height
Andrade, F.H., Calvino, P., Cirilo, A. and Barbieri, P., 2002. Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal, 94(5), pp.975–980. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.9750
Azadgoleh, M.A.E. and Kazemi, Z., 2007. A study of the planting pattern and densityeffects on yield and physiological growth parameters in two corn cultivars (Zea maysL.). Ecology Environmentand Conservation, 13(3), pp.467–472.
Balkcom, K.S., Satterwhite, J.L., Arriaga, F.J., Price, A.J. and Van Santen, E., 2011. Conventional and glyphosate-resistantmaize yields across plant densities in single- and twin-row configurations. Field Crops Research, 120(3), pp.330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.013
Barkhi, A., Rashed-Mohassel, M.H., Nasiri-Mahallati, M., Hosseini, S.M. and Moazzen, Sh., 2009. Effect of planting patternand plant density on growth, yield and yield components of maize (Zea may L.) in competition with redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retrofelexus). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 11(1), pp.67-81. [In Persian].
Bazrafshan, F., Fathi, G.,Siadat, S.A., Ayenehband, A. and Alami-Saeed, K., 2005. Effects of planting pattern andplant density on yield and yield components of sweet corn. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 28(3), pp.117-126. [In Persian].
Biaziegr, P.S. and Glover, D.V., 1980. Effect of Reducing Plant Population on Yield and Kernel Characteristics of Sugary-2 and Normal Maize. Crop Science, 20(4), pp.444–447. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183x002000040005x
Chin Choy, E.W. and Kanemasu, E.T., 1974. Energy balance comparisons of wide and narrow row spacings in sorghum. Agronomy Journal, 66(1), pp.98–100. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600010027x
Cloninger, F.D., Horrocks, R.D. and Zuber, M.S., 1975. Effect of harvest date, plant density and hybrid on corngrain quality. Agronomy Journal, 67(5), pp.693–695. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1975.00021962006700050028x
Damavandi, A. and Haghshenas, S., 2022. Windbreak construction methods around agricultural fields. Tehran:Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization.[In Persian].
De Herralde, F., Biel, C.and Savé, R., 2003. Leaf photosynthesis in eight almond tree cultivars. Biologia Plantarum, 46(4), pp.557–561. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024867612478
Dehghanpour, Z., 2014. Instructions for planting, growing and harvesting corn. Karaj: Seed and Plant Improvement Institute.[In Persian].
Duncan, S. and Schapaugh, W., 1993. Row orientation and planting pattern of relay intercropped soybean and wheat. Journal of Production Agriculture, 6(3), pp.360–364. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1993.0360
El-Hendawy, S.E., Abd El-Lattief, E.A., Ahmed, M.S. and Schmidhalter, U., 2008. Irrigation rate and plantdensity effects on yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated corn. AgriculturalWater Management, 95(7), pp.836–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.02.008
Elmore, R.W., Marx, D.B., Klein, R.G. and Abendroth,L.J., 2005. Wind effect on corn leaf azimuth. Crop Science, 45(6), pp.2598–2604. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0586
Eskandarnejad, S., Khavari, S., Bakhtiari, S. and Heidarian, A.R., 2013. Effect of rowspacing and plant density on yield and yield components of Sweet corn (Zea mays L.Saccharata) varieties. Advanced Crop Science, 3(1), pp.8188.
Foroghi, A., Gherkhlo, J. and Ghaderifar, F., 2013. Row spacing and common cocklebur interference effect on grain yieldand its components of two sesame cultivars in Gorgan. Crop Production, 6(2), pp.101-116. [In Persian].
Ge, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, B., Chao, Q., Yu, Y., Gong, X., Hao, Y., Li, L., Jiang, Y. and Lv, G.Y., 2022. Photosynthetic mechanism of high yield under an improved wide–narrow row planting pattern in maize. Photosynthetica, 60(3), pp.465475. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2022.032
Giacosa, S., Marengo, F., Guidoni, S., Rolle, L. and Hunter, J.J., 2015. Anthocyanin yield and skin softening during maceration, as affected by vineyard row orientation and grape ripeness of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz. Food Chemistry, 174, pp.8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.155
Gozubenli, H., 2010. Influence of planting patterns and plant density on the performance of maize hybridsin the eastern Mediterranean conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 12(4), pp.556–560.
Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G., Zheng, W. and Martinez de Toda, F., 2021. Strategies in vineyard establishment to face global warming in viticulture: A mini review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,101(4), pp.1261–1269. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10813
Hosseini, P., Rahimian Mashhadi, H. and Alizadeh, H., 2011. Competition of Red Root Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with Two Soybean (Glysine max) Cultivars under Sole and Intercropping Systems - Light Absorption, Soybean Growth  Indices. Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 7, pp.25–35. [In Persian].
Hosseinzadeh, M.h., Esfahani, M., Rabiei, M. andRabiei, B., 2008. Effect of row spacing on light interception, grain yield and growth indices ofrapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars as second crop following rice. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 10(3), pp.281-302. [In Persian].
Hunter,  J.J., Volschenk, C.G. and Booyse, M., 2017. Vineyard row orientation and grape ripeness level effects on vegetative and reproductive growth characteristics of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz/101-14 Mgt. European Journal of Agronomy, 84, pp.47–57. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.eja.2016.12.004
Hydar, L., 2018. The effect of row direction on the productivity traits of some sweet corn genotypes (Zea mays L. saccharata. sturt). Syrian Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(3), pp.31-43. [In Arabic].
Johnson, B.L. and Hanson, B.K., 2003. Row‐spacing interactions on spring canola performance in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal, 95(3), pp.703-708. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.7030
Larson, W.E. and Hanway,J.J., 1977. Corn and Corn Improvement,Corn production.In: G. F. Sprague, ed. pp.625—669. American Society of Agronomy,Inc., Madison, WI.
Lawson, A.N., Van Acker, R.C. and Friesen, L.F., 2006. Emergence timing of volunteer canola in spring wheat fields in Manitoba. Weed Science, 54(5), pp.873–882. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-05-169.I.1
Li, J., Xie, R.Z., Wang, K.R., Hou, P., Ming, B., Zhang, G.Q., Liu, G.Z., Wu, M., Yang, Z.S. and Li, S.K., 2018. Response of canopy structure, light interception and grain yield to plant density in maize. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 156(6), pp.785794. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859618000692
Liu, S.Q., Wang, Y., Song, F.B., Qi, X.N., Li, X.N. and Zhu, X.C., 2017. Responses of leaf architecture traits and yield in maize to different row orientation and planting patterns in northeast China. Romanian Agricultural Research, 34, pp.1–12.
Lu, Y., Zhang, X., Chen, S., Shao, L., Sun, H. and Niu, J., 2017. Increasing the planting uniformity improves the yield of summer maize. Agronomy Journal, 109(4), pp.14631475. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.12.0718
Luqman, L., Hussain, Z., Ilyas, M., Khan, I.A. and Bakht, T., 2020. Influence of sowing orientation and inter cropping of chilies on onion yield and its associated weeds in Peshawar, Pakistan. Pakistan  Journal of Botany. 52(1), pp.95–100. https://doi.org/10.30848/pjb2020-1(6)
Maddonni, G.A. and Otegui, M.E., 1996. Leaf area, light interception, and crop development in maize. Field Crops Research, 48(1), pp.81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(96)00035-4
Majd Nasiri, B. and Ahmadi, M.R., 2005. Effect of planting season and density on light distribution and interception in canopy in different safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science. 36(1), pp.63-73. [In Persian].
Maldera, F., Carone, V.,Castellarnau, I.I., Vivaldi, G.A. and Camposeo, S., 2023. Available PAR, growth and yield of a super high-densityalmond orchard are influenced bydifferent row orientations. Agronomy, 13(3), pp.874. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030874
Naik, M.R., Hemalatha, S., Reddy, A.P.K., Madhuri, K.V.N., Umamahesh, V. and Rakesh, S.,2022. Efficient Need Based Nitrogen Management in Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.) using Leaf Colour Chart Under Varied Planting Density. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 13(6), pp.586-594. https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2022.2881a
Novak, L. and Ransom, J., 2018. Factors impacting corn (Zea mays L.) establishment and the role of uniform establishment on yield. Agricultural Sciences, 9(10), pp.13171336. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2018.910092
Piao, L., Qi, H., Li, C.F., Zhao, M., 2016. Optimized tillage practices and row spacing to improve grain yield andmatter transport efficiency in intensive spring maize. Field Crops Research, 198, pp.258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.012
Piao, L., Zhang, S., Yan, J.,Xiang, T., Chen, Y., Li, M. and Gu,W., 2022. Contribution of fertilizer, density and row spacing practices for maize yield and efficiency enhancement innortheast china. Plants, 11(21), pp.2985. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212985
Sarlikioti, V., De Visser, P.H.B. and Marcelis, L.F.M., 2011. Exploring the spatial distribution of light interception and photosynthesis of canopies by means of a functional–structural plant model. Annals of Botany, 107(5), pp.875–883.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr006
Salehi, B., 2005. Effect of row spacing and plant density on grain yield and yield components in maize (cv. Sc 704) in Miyaneh. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 6(4), pp.383-394. [In Persian].
Shakarami, G. and Rafiee, M., 2009. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) to planting pattern and density in Iran. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 5(1), pp.69-73.
Shapiro, C.A. and Wortmann, C.S., 2006. Corn response to nitrogen rate, row spacing, and plant density in eastern Nebraska. Agronomy Journal, 98(3), pp.529-535. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0137
Souza, C.R.D., Mota, R.V.D., Silva, C.P.C., Raimundo, R.H.P. and Peregrino, I.,2019. Row orientation effects on Syrah grape vine performance during winter growing season. Revista Ceres, 66(3), pp.184–190. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x201966030004
Tian, C., Han, J., Li, J., Zhen, G., Liu, Y., Lu, Y., ... and Wang, Y., 2019. Effects of row direction and row spacing on maize leaf senescence. Plos one, 14(4), e0215330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215330
Turget, I., Duncan, A., Bilgili, U. and Acikgoz, E., 2005. Alternative row spacing and plant density effects on forage and dry matter yield of corn hybrids. Agronomy Journal, 20, pp.146–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037x.2004.00146.x
Widdicombe, W.D. and Thelen, K.D., 2002. Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the northern Corn Belt. Agronomy Journal, 94(5), pp.1020–1023. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.1020
 
دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 17
تابستان 1404
صفحه 255-274

  • تاریخ دریافت 28 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 13 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 15 بهمن 1403