تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

تحقیقات علوم زراعی در مناطق خشک

مقایسه دو سیستم کشت نیمه‎سنتی و مکانیزه برنج با استفاده از شاخص‎های انرژی و اقتصادی (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان دورود)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران
2 گروه مهندسی کشاورزی، دانشگاه ملی مهارت، تهران، ایران
چکیده
با توجه به روند رو به رشد جمعیت جهان، اهمیت مطالعات انرژی در بخش کشاورزی روبه افزایش است. این تحقیق در سال 1401 بهمنظور مقایسه دو سیستم کشت نیمهسنتی و مکانیزه برنج در شهرستان دورود با استفاده از شاخصهای انرژی و اقتصادی انجام شد. بدین منظور، از شاخصهای مختلف انرژی (انرژی خالص، بهرهوری انرژی، کارایی مصرف انرژی، انرژی مخصوص و کارایی مصرف آب) و اقتصادی (کل هزینههای تولید، درآمد ناخالص، درآمد خالص و نسبت سود به هزینه) استفاده شد. میزان کل انرژی ورودی به سیستمهای کشت نیمهسنتی و مکانیزه بهترتیب 139666/34 و 136228/19 مگاژول در هکتار بود. بیشترین میزان مصرف انرژی در سیستمهای نیمهسنتی و مکانیزه بهترتیب مربوط به سوخت فسیلی (65/96 و 66/49 درصد)، آب آبیاری (17/17 و 16/62 درصد) و کود نیتروژن (10/97 و 10/94 درصد) بود. میزان انرژی خالص، بهرهوری انرژی، کارایی مصرف انرژی و انرژی مخصوص در سیستم کشت نیمهسنتی برابر 11381/66 مگاژول بر هکتار، 0/04 کیلوگرم بر مگاژول، 1/08 و 23/92 مگاژول در هکتار بود. این درحالی بود که در سیستم کشت مکانیزه این مقادیر برابر 29419/81 مگاژول بر هکتار، 0/05 کیلوگرم بر مگاژول، 1/22 و 21/49 مگاژول در هکتار بدست آمد. درآمد خالص در سیستمهای کشت مکانیزه و نیمهسنتی برابر 989714780 و 813695300 ریال بدست آمد. روی هم، روش کشت مکانیزه بر اساس شاخصهای اقتصادی و انرژی نسبت به روش کشت نیمهسنتی برنج برتر بود. برای افزایش سهم انرژیهای تجدیدپذیر و کارایی مصرف انرژی نیز میتوان با آبیاری بر اساس نیاز گیاه و کاهش سوخت فسیلی برای آبیاری مزارع به این مهم دست یافت.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Comparison of two semi-traditional and mechanized rice farming systems using energy and economic indices (case study: Dorud county)

نویسندگان English

Marzieh Hadifard 1
Khosro Azizi 1
Sajjad Rahimi-Moghaddam 1
Hamed Eyni-Nargeseh 2
1 Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Today, agriculture is one of the main consumers of energy in the world. Due to the limitations of energy resources and the growing trend of the world population, the importance of studying energy in the agricultural sector becomes apparent. Analyzing energy input flows to agricultural systems can improve energy use efficiency by understanding more details about inputs and their contribution in total energy input to the farm.
Materials and Methods: The present research aimed to analyze energy and economic indicators in semi-traditional and mechanized rice farming systems in Durood County, Lorestan Province, in 2022. The data used in this study were obtained using a questionnaire and face to face in the studied region. In this research, different energy indicators (net energy, energy efficiency, energy consumption efficiency, specific energy, and water efficiency) and economic indicators (total production cost, gross income, net income, and income-cost ratio) were used to compare the energy flow in two systems of semi-traditional and mechanized rice cultivation.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that the total energy input entering the semi-traditional and mechanized farming systems was calculated as 139666.34 and 136228.19 MJ ha-1, respectively. The highest amount of energy use in the semi-traditional and mechanized systems is related to fossil fuel (65.96 and 66.49%), irrigation water (17.17 and 16.62%), and nitrogen fertilizer (10.97 and 10.97%), respectively. The results of this research showed that in both semi-traditional and mechanized farming systems, the share of direct energies was significantly higher than indirect energies, which was due to the excessive use of resources such as human labor, fossil fuel, and irrigation water. In addition, non-renewable energies also made up about 80% of the input energies entering the semi-traditional and mechanized farming systems in Durood county, while the share of renewable energies was calculated to be about 20%. The higher share of non-renewable energies can be attributed to the excessive use of chemical fertilizers (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potash), fossil fuels, pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides. The results of the analyzing energy indicators revealed that the amounts of net energy, energy productivity, energy use efficiency, and specific energy in the semi-traditional farming system were equal to 11381.66 MJ ha-1, 0.04 kg MJ-1, 1.08, and 22.92 MJ ha-1, while they were calculated as 29419.81 MJ ha-1, 0.05 kg MJ-1, 1.22 and 21.49 MJ ha-1 in the mechanized farming system, respectively. Moreover, the water use efficiency was equal to 0.248 and 0.285 kg m3 in semi-traditional and mechanized systems, respectively. The net income in the mechanized farming system (989714780 Rials) was higher than the net income obtained from the semi-traditional rice farming system (813695300 Rials) due to the higher economic performance of grain and straw. The income-to-cost ratio was also higher in the mechanized system than in the semi-traditional system, indicating more income per unit of cost in the mechanized system.
Conclusion: Altogether and according to the findings of this research, the mechanized cultivation method was superior as compared with the semi-traditional rice cultivation method based on economic and energy indicators. It is suggested that in order to increase the share of renewable energies and increase the energy use efficiency in both mechanized and semi-traditional systems, farmers should use less fossil fuel for irrigating the fields by using irrigation water based on the plant's irrigation requirement.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Energy use efficiency
Fossil fuel
Irrigation water
Renewable energies
Seed yield
Acaroglu, M., 1998. Energy from biomass, and applications. University of Selcuk, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Turkey.
Asgharipour, M.R., Mondani, F. and Riahinia, Sh., 2012. Energy use efficiency and economic analysis of sugar beet production system in Iran: A case study in Khorasan Razavi province. Energy, 44, pp.1078-1084. https://doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.023
Attar, S., Sheikh Davoodi, M.J. and Almassi, M., 2010. Energy analysis two different rice production system in Khouzestan province east (A case study in Ramhormoz restrict). In Proceedings of the 6th National Conference of Mechanic and Mechanization of Agricultural Machinery, University of Tehran, Sep. 15–16, Karaj, Iran. [In Persian].
Azizi, Kh., Rahimi, L., Goodarzi, D., Daneshvar, M. and Hydari, S., 2023. Evaluation of energy efficiency and ecological productivity of wheat and potato agroecosystem ecosystems in Borujerd city, Lorestan province. Crop Science Research in Arid Regions, 5(3), pp.761–774. https://doi.org/10.22034/csrar.2023.349325.1252
Boluki, M.S., Keyhani, A. and Rafiee, Sh., 2010. Energy consumption and economic analysis of rice paddy production; A case study of port Anzali. In Proceedings of the 6th National Conference of Mechanic and Mechanization of Agricultural Machinery, University of Tehran, Sep. 15–16, Karaj, Iran. [In Persian].
Erdal, G., Esengun, K., Erdal, H. and Gunduz, O., 2007. Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy, 32, pp.35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.007
FAO., 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Data. www.faostat.fao.org
Gundogmus, E., 2006. Energy use on organic farming: A comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on small holdings in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 47, pp.3351–3359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.01.001
Htwe, T., Sinutok, S., Chotikarn, P., Amin, N., Akhtaruzzaman, M., Techato, K. and Hossain, T., 2021. Energy use efficiency and cost-benefits analysis of rice cultivation: A study on conventional and alternative methods in Myanmar. Energy, 214, 119104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119104
Karimi, V., Sadrabadi Haghighi, R., Barzegar, A.B., Dargahi, M., 2019. Energy efficiency comparison of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production in different irrigation methods in Jolgeh Rokh Torbat Heidarieh region. Journal of Agroecology, 11 (3), pp.859-876. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v11i3.71190
Kazemi, H., Kamkar, B., Lakzaei, S., Badsar, M. and Shahbyki, M., 2015. Energy flow analysis for rice production in different geographical regions of Iran. Energy, 84, pp.390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.005
Khan, S., Khan, M.A., Hanjra, M.A. and Mu, J., 2009. Pathways to reduce the environmental footprints of water and energy input in food production. Food Policy, 34, pp.141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.11.002
Kizilaslan, H., 2009. Input–output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat Province of Turkey. Applied Energy, 86, pp.1354–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.07.009
MAJ [Ministry of Agriculture Jihad]., 2021. Agricultural statistics, 2020–2021, Volume 1. http://www.maj.ir/portal/home/  
Mazarei, M., Ghanbari, A., Dahmardeh, M., Siadat, S.A. and Dehdari, S., 2019. Assessment of yield and input-output energy and economic indicators in different tillage and fertilizer systems of corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agroecology, 11(2), pp.417–434. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v11i2.68001
Mobtaker, H. G., Akram, A., Keyhani, A. and Mohammadi, A., 2012. Optimization of energy required for alfalfa production using data envelopment analysis approach. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(2), pp.242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.02.001
Mohammadzadeh, A., Damghani, A.M., Vafabakhsh, J. and Deihimfard, R., 2017. Assessing energy efficiencies, economy, and global warming potential (GWP) effects of major crop production systems in Iran: A case study in East Azerbaijan province. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, pp.16971–16984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9253-5
Ozkan, B., Akcaoz, H. and Fert, C., 2004. Energy input-output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy, 29, pp.39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-1481(03)00135-6
Ozkan, B., Ceylan, R.F. and Kizilay, H., 2011. Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production. Renewable Energy, 36, pp.1639–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.022
Pathak, B.S. and Binning, A.S., 1985. Energy use pattern and potential for energy saving in rice–wheat cultivation. Energy in Agriculture, 4, pp.271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5826(85)90022-1
Pishgar-Komleh, S.H., Sefeedpari, P. and Rafiee, S., 2011. Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan province of Iran. Energy, 36, pp.5824–5831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.08.044
Platis, D.P., Anagnostopoulos, C.D., Tsaboula, A.D., Menexes, G.C., Kalburtji, K.L. and Mamolos, A.P., 2019. Energy analysis, and carbon and water footprint for environmentally friendly farming practices in agroecosystems and agroforestry. Sustainability, 11, 1664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061664
Pourshirazi, Sh. and Rasam, Gh., 2013. Investigation of environmental effects and energy use in rice production systems. In The first national conference and specialized exhibition of environment, energy and clean industry, 2 December, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
Saber, Z., Esmaeili, M.A., Pirdashti, H., Motevali, A. and Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., 2022. Assessing the energy components and the environmental impacts of the different rice (Oryza sativa L.) production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. Journal of Agroecology, 14(3), pp.429–448. https://doi.org/10.22067/agry.2021.68179.1010
Sayin, C., Mencet, M.N. and Ozkan, B., 2005. Assessing of energy policies based on Turkish agriculture: Current status and some implications. Energy Policy, 33, pp.2361–2373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.05.005
Shahhoseini, H.R., Ramroudi, M. and Kazemi, H., 2021. Evaluating and comparing the sustainability of autumn and spring potato agroecosystems using energy analysis (Case study: Golestan Province). Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 30(4), pp.265–279. https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2020.12316
Sharifi, M., Soodmand-Moghaddam, S., Izadi, M. and Abbaszadeh, R., 2021. Analysis of economic and energy indicators in different methods of protective tillage in wheat cultivar (Case study: Dasht-e Naz Sari agro industrial company). Journal of Agroecology, 13(2), pp.195–210. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v13i2.81534
Singh, H., Mishra, D. and Nahar, N.M., 2002. Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone, India: Part I. Energy Conversion and Management, 43, pp.2275–2286.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-8904(01)00161-3
Singh, S. and Mittal, J.P., 1992. Energy in production agriculture. Mittal Publications.
Singh, S., Singh, S., Mittal, J.P., Pannu, C.J.S. and Bhangoo, B.S., 1994. Energy inputs and crop yield relationships for rice in Punjab. Energy, 19(10), pp.1061–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(94)90094-9
Soni, P., Sinha, R. and Roger Perret, S., 2018. Energy use and efficiency in selected rice-based cropping systems of the Middle-Indo Gangetic Plains in India. Energy Reports, 4, pp.554–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.09.001
Tabatabaie, S.M.H., Rafiee, S., Keyhani, A. and Ebrahimi, A., 2013. Energy and economic assessment of prune production in Tehran province of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, pp.280–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.052
Tavakoli Kakhki, H. and Ghodsi, M., 2020. Evaluation of energy efficiency indices according to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based crop in conservation agricultural systems in temperate climate region (A case study: Gonabad). Journal of Agroecology, 12(3), pp.433–445. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v12i3.80119
Vafabakhsh, J. and Mohammadzadeh, A., 2019. Energy flow and GHG emissions in major field and horticultural crop production systems (Case study: Sharif Abad plain). Journal of Agroecology, 11(2), pp.365–382. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v11i2.81742
Vahedi, A. and Zarifneshatm, S., 2021. Evaluation energy flow and analysis of energy economy for irrigated wheat production in different geographical regions of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 11(2), pp.505–523. https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v11i2.81747
Yilmaz, I., Akcaoz, H. and Ozkan, B., 2005. An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 30, pp.145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.06.001
Yousefzadeh, S. and Firouzi, S., 2016. The study of the factors affecting the development of mechanization of rice cultivation in Guilan province by Delphi technique. Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering, 47(1), pp.83–92. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2016.58480

  • تاریخ دریافت 21 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 26 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 30 مرداد 1403