اثر رقم و تاریخ کاشت لوبیا سفید (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)بر جمعیت و رشد علف‌های هرز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد علوم علف‌های هرز، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

2 گروه گیاهپزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

3 عضو هیئت علمی ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی شهرستان بروجرد، ایران

چکیده

به منظور ارزیابی اثرات تاریخ کاشت و ارقام لوبیا سفید بر جمعیت علف‌های هرز، آزمایشی در سال زراعی 95-1394 در ایستگاه تحقیقات بروجرد به صورت اسپلیت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با 4 تکرار اجرا شد. آزمایش شامل چهار تاریخ کاشت (1 اردیبهشت، 20 اردیبهشت، 10خرداد و 30 خرداد)، رقم در دو سطح؛ لاین گویانوک 98 و رقم الماس بودند. نتایج آزمایش نشان داد که تأخیر در تاریخ کاشت سبب افزایش درصد فراوانی، تراکم و درصد چیرگی علف‎های‌هرز شد. علف‌هرز تاج‌خروس ‌(Amaranthus retroflexus L.)، بیشترین میانگین فراوانی (85/41 درصد)، میزان چیرگی (39/2 درصد) و نیز زیست‌توده (711/09 گرم در مترمربع) را به خود اختصاص داد. بیشترین فراوانی علف‎های‌ هرز (54/5 درصد) در تاریخ کاشت دوم حاصل شد که نسبت به تاریخ کاشت‎های اول، سوم و چهارم به ترتیب 85/34، 61/29 و 16/19 درصد افزایش داشت. کمترین و بیشترین تراکم علف‎های هرز به ترتیب در تاریخ کاشت‌های 1 اردیبهشت و 10 خرداد با میانگین 85/76 و 195/66 بوته در مترمربع مشاهده شد. تأخیر20 روز در کاشت، سبب افزایش 46/45 درصدی زیست‌توده علف‎های هرز گردید. هم‎چنین کمترین و بیشترین زیست‌توده علف‌های هرز به‎ ترتیب در تاریخ کاشت‎های اول و دوم با میانگین 1139/65 و 2128/35 گرم در مترمربع حاصل شد. بر اساس نتایج حاصل از این آزمایش، کاشت رقم رشد نامحدود الماس در اوایل اردیبهشت‌ماه به علت کاهش زیست‌توده علف‌های هرز، بهترین کاندید برای کشت در شهرستان بروجرد می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of cultivar and planting date of white beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on weed population and growth

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ahmad Goudarzi 1
  • Ahmadi Godarzi 2
  • Mohammad Hassan Koushki 3
1 M.Sc. Graduated of Weed Science, Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
3 Faculty Member of Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Station of Boroujerd, Boroujerd, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: One of the key factors contributing to crop yield reduction is competition with weeds, which can greatly reduce the density and growth of crops. Among the most important legumes in the world, beans have become a popular substitute for animal protein and are one of the highest-producing legumes in Iran, following chickpeas. Weeds present a major challenge to maximizing bean production as they compete with beans for essential resources such as light, water, and nutrients. Additionally, weeds can impede harvesting operations and negatively impact the overall quality of the final product. In unmanaged environments, the presence of annual weeds caused a 70% reduction in the yield of white beans. Specifically, for each kilogram of dry matter comprised of annual weeds, the yield of white beans decreased by 0.38 kg per hectare. The choice of cultivar and planting date can have a significant effect on the weed population and growth in white bean fields. Different cultivars have varying levels of competitiveness with weeds, which can impact the overall weed population in the field. Similarly, the timing of planting can also affect weed growth and development. Research has shown that certain white bean cultivars, such as 'ICA Pijao' and 'Goyas', have greater competitiveness with weeds than other cultivars like 'Tacarigua'. This means that fields planted with these more competitive cultivars may experience lower weed populations compared to those planted with less competitive cultivars. Planting dates can also play a role in weed management. Early planting can allow for rapid crop establishment, which can help suppress weed growth by competing for light, nutrients, and water. However, early planting may also coincide with peak weed emergence, which can lead to increased competition between the crop and weeds. Conversely, late planting may result in slower crop establishment and reduced competitiveness with weeds, leading to higher weed populations. However, late planting may also allow for the use of pre-plant or pre-emergent herbicides, which can help to control weed populations prior to crop emergence.
Materials and Methods: An experiment was conducted at Boroujerd Research Station in 2015–2016 as a split factorial in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications to evaluate the effects of planting dates and white bean cultivars on the weed population. Planting dates (21 April, 10 May, 31 May, and 20 June), bean cultivars (Line GOYONOK98 and the Almas), and weed-free and weed-infested treatments were all investigated. Data variance analysis was done using SAS 9.4 statistical software, and graphs were drawn by Excel software. The mean comparison of the desired traits was also done by Duncan's test at the 5% probability level.
Results and Discussion: The findings revealed that delaying the planting date increased the percentage of frequency, density, and weed dominance. Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) was the most important weed species in the experiment, with the highest frequency (85.41 percent), dominance rate (39.2 percent), and biomass (711.09 g/m2). The second planting date had the highest weed frequency (54.5 percent), which increased by 34.85, 29.61, and 19.16 percent, respectively, compared to the first, third, and fourth planting dates. Weed densities were lowest on April 20 and highest on May 30, with an average of 85.76 and 195.66 plants per m-2, respectively. A 20-day delay in planting resulted in a 46.45 percent increase in weed biomass. In addition, the first and second plantings had the lowest and highest weed biomasses, with averages of 1139.65 and 2128.35 g. m-2, respectively. According to the results of this experiment, planting an indeterminate -growth cultivar of Almas on April 21 was the best candidate for cultivation in Boroujerd due to reduced weed biomass.
Conclusion: The experiment's findings indicate that achieving the maximum yield of white beans is only possible when one has a good understanding of various factors such as climatic conditions, agricultural practices, and environmental stresses. Planting white beans at the beginning of May was observed to result in the lowest population and biomass of weeds due to unfavorable growth conditions for weeds like low temperature and light intensity. As a result, beans had ample growth opportunities without weed competition, resulting in considerable reductions in weeding and weed control costs and ultimately leading to the highest seed yield. In conclusion, early May planting is more advantageous than other dates regarding water resource accessibility and weed competition.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Density
  • Dominance
  • White bean Almas cv
  • Line GOYONOK98
Ahmadi, A.R., Baghestani meibodi, M.A., Mousavi, S.K. and Rastgoo, M. 2007. Evaluation of competitive ability of two dry bean (Phaselous vulgaris L.) cultivars using critical period of weed interference experiment. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 76: 64-70. (In Persian).
  Ahmadi, A.R., Rashed Mohasel, M.H., Baghestani meibodi, M.A. and Rostami, M. 2004. The effects of critical period of weed competition on yield, yield components and morphological characteristics of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar. Derakhshan (K.R.D-29). Journal of Plant Pests and Diseases, 72(1): 31-49. (In Persian).
Ahmadzadeh Ghavidel, R., Asadi, G.A., Naseri Pour Yazdi, M.T., Ghorbani, R. and Khorramdel, S. 2018. Effect of plant density and manure application rate on yield and yield components of various common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 9(1): 12-28. (In Persian).
Avarseji, Z., Rashed Mohasel, M.H., Nezami, A. and Ghorbani, R. 2005. Effect of planting date and density of thebean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on the growth of weeds. Proc. 2nd Weed Science. Conference in Iran, 244-248. (In Persian).
Beizaii, A. 1999. In Persian Project Final Report and Compare the Yield of White Beans, Red and Pinto. Central Agriculture Research Center.
Blackshaw, R.E. 1998. Weed management in bean. Agriculture and Agrifood Canada, Lethridge. www. pulse. ab. ca/news-letter/98 spring /bean .html.
Chaudhary, B.M., Patel, J.J. and Delvadia, D.R. 2005. Effect of weed management practices and seed rates on weeds and yield of chickpea. Indian Journal. Weed Science, 37: 271-272.
Datta, A., Sindel, B.M., Jessop, R.S., Kristiansen, P. and Felton, W.L. 2007. Phytotoxic response and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes with pre-emergence pplication of isoxaflutole. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 47: 1460-1467.
Day, T., Day, H., Hawthorne, W., Mayfield, A., McMurray, L., Rethus, G. and Turner, C. 2006. Grain Legume Handbook. Eds. Lamb, J. and Poddar, A. Einarsson, A., and Milberg, P. 1999. Species richness and distribution in relation to light in wooded meadows and pastures in southern Sweden. Ann Bot Fennici, 36: 99-107.
Erman, M., Tepe, I., Bükün, B., Yergin, R. and Taşkesen, M. 2008. Critical period of weed control in winter lentil under non-irrigated conditions in Turkey. African Journal of Agriculture Research, 3: 523-530.
Ghamari, H. and Ahmadvand, G. 2015. Effect of weed competition on seed’s protein, seed’s electrical conductivity and leaf’s relative chlorophyll content of dry bean. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi), 107: 67-73. (In Persian).
Ghanbari Motlagh, M., Rastgoo, M., Pur Yusef, M., Saba, J. and Afsahi, K. 2011.  Effect of sowing date and weed interference on yield and yield components of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with different growth habitat. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 2(1): 1-20. (In Persian).
Hallgren, E., Palmer, M.W. and Milberg, P. 1999. Data diving with cross validation and investigation of broadscale gradient in Swedish weed communities. Journal of Ecology, 87: 1015-1037.
Holding, D. and Bowcher, A. 2004. Weeds in Winter Pulses – Jntegrated solutions. CRC for Australian Weed Management Technical Series #9.
Horvath, D.P., Hansen, S.A., Moriles-Miller, J.P., Pierik, R., Yan, C., Clay, D.E., Scheffler, B. and Clay, S.A. 2015. RNAseq reveals weed-induced PIF3-like as a candidate target to manipulate weed stress response in soybean. New Phytologist, 207: 196-210.
Labrada, R. 1997. Problems related to the development of weed management in the eveloping world. Expert Consultation on weed Ecology and management, 22-24 September 1997. FAO. Rome.
Lak, M.R., Dorri, H.R. and Farahani, L. 2013. Effect of weeds interference on yield and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Society of Weed Science, 9: 65-78. (In Persian).
Majnon Hosseini, N. 2008. Agriculture and Cereal Production. Mashhad University Press. (In Persian).
Malik, V.S., Swanton, C.J. and Michaels, T.E. 1999. Interaction of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars, row spacing and seed density with annual weeds. Weed Science, 41: 62-68.
Mamun, M.A.A., Shultana, R., Siddique, M.A., Zahan, M.S. and Pramanik, S. 2011. Efficacy of different commercial product oxadiazon and pyrazosulfuron-ethyl on rice and associated weeds in dry season rice cultivation. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7: 341-346.
Mashiqa, P., Moatshe, O., Tiroesele, B., Lekgari, L. and Molosiwa, O. 2019. Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to varying planting dates in Botswana.  Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research, 7(2): 26-30.
Milberg, P., Hallgren, E. and Palmer, M.W. 2001. Timing disturbance and vegetation development: How sowing date affects the weed flora in springsown crops. Vegetation Science, 12: 93-98.
Mola, T. and Belachew, K. 2015. Determination of critical period of weed-common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) competition at Kaffa, Southwest Ethiopia. Greener. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(3): 93-100.
Mousavi, S.K., Pezeshkpour, P. and Shahroudi, M. 2009. Effects of planting date, crop variety and weed interference on yield and yield components of dry land chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal Field Crop Science, 40: 59-69. (In Persian).
Mousavi, S.K., Zand, E. and Baghestani, M.A. 2006. Effect of planting density on the interference of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and weeds. Plant Pests and Diseases, 73(1): 79-92. (In Persian).
Ogg, A.G., Seefeldt, S.S. and Wilson, R.G. 2000. Effect of cultivar and row spacing on weed populations in dry edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Weed Technology, 14(1): 77-83.
Rathore, M., Singh, R., Choudhary, P.P. and Kumar, B. 2014. Weed Stress in Plants. In: R.K. Gaur and P. Sharma (Eds.). Approaches to Plant Stress and Their Management. Springer, New Delhi, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London. pp: 255-265.
Salehi, M. and Khorshidi Benam, M.B. 2008. Response of grain yield and yield components of red beans to the delay in planting in miane region. Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 43: 105-115. (In Persian).
Soltani, N., Shropshire, C. and Sikkema, P.H. 2016. The effect of planting date on weed control and yield in white beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 96(3): 319-327.
Thomas, A.G. 1991. Floristic composition and relative abundance of weeds in annual crops of Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 71: 831-839.
Werner, D. 2005. Production and biological nitrogen fixation of tropical legumes. p.1-13. In: D. Werner and W.E. Newton (Eds.). Nitrogen Fixation in Agriculture, Forestry, Ecology, and the Environment. Springer. Printed in the Netherlands.
Yaduraju, N.T. and Mishra, J.S. 2005. Weed management in pulses. In: Singh, G., Sekhon, H.S., and Kolar J.S. (Eds.). Pulses. Agrotech Publishing Academy, Udaipur.
Zand, E. and Beckie, H.J. 2002. Competitive ability of hybrid and open pollinated anola (Brassica napus L.) with wild oat (Avena fatua). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 82: 473-480.