تاثیر علف کش هالوکسی فوپ‌آر متیل و تراکم علف هرز دم روباهی بر عملکرد کمی و کیفی بادام زمینی

صابرهمیشگی, مریم; دورودیان, حمیدرضا; محمدیان روشن, ناصر; بیدریغ, سیروس

doi:10.22034/csrar.2023.315621.1158

تاثیر علف کش هالوکسی فوپ‌آر متیل و تراکم علف هرز دم روباهی بر عملکرد کمی و کیفی بادام زمینی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ دانشجوی دکترای رشته زراعت، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، واحد لاهیجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لاهیجان، ایران

² گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، واحد لاهیجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لاهیجان، ایران

10.22034/csrar.2023.315621.1158

چکیده

به منظور ارزیابی تأثیر علفکش هالوکسی فوپآرمتیل و علف هرز دم روباهی (Alopecurus myosuroides) بر عملکرد بادام زمینی، آزمایشی به صورت اسپلیت پلات در قالب طرح بلوک های کامل تصادفی در 3 تکرار در سالهای 1396 و 1397 در شرق گیلان انجام شد. عامل اصلی شامل مصرف علفکش هالوکسیفوپ آرمتیل در 6 سطح با دزهای 0، 0/1، 0/2، 0/4، 0/8 و 1/6 لیتر در هکتار و عامل فرعی تراکم علف هرز دمروباهی در پنج تراکم شامل صفر (بدون علف هرز)، 60، 120، 180 و 250 بوته در مترمربع بود. نتایج نشان داد که اثر متقابل غلظت علفکش و تراکم بوته در سطح پنج درصد بر عملکرد بیولوژیک، غلاف و دانه معنیدار بود. حداکثر عملکرد دانه در غلظت 0/4 لیتر در هکتار و تراکم 60 بوته در متر مربع با میانگین 2798 کیلوگرم در هکتار مشاهده شد. بیشترین درصد مغزدهی و سرعت رشد محصول در غلظت 0/4 لیتر در هکتار و تراکم بوته شاهد به ترتیب با میانگین 78/5 درصد و 109/4 گرم در متر مربع در روز بهدست آمد. بیشترین وزن صددانه و سطح ویژه برگ به ترتیب در غلظت های 0/4 و 1/6 لیتر در هکتار با میانگین 86/3 گرم و 157/6 مترمربع بر گرم بود. حداکثر میزان روغن دانه و شاخص سطح برگ در تراکم 60 بوته در متر مربع بهترتیب با 24 درصد و 3/9 مشاهده شد. با توجه به نتایج، غلظت 0/4 لیتر در هکتار و بدون علف هرز و همچنین تراکم 60 بوته در مترمربع به عنوان مناسب ترین تیمار جهت مدیریت علف هرز دم روباهی و علفکش هالوکسی فوپآر متیل برای بادام زمینی در منطقه مورد مطالعه پیشنهاد نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.2423611.1401.4.2.19.7

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of herbicide Haloxifhop-R-methyl application and foxtail weed on quantitative and qualitative yield of peanut

نویسندگان [English]

Maryam Saber Hamishegi ¹
Hamid reza Doroudian ²
Naser Mohammadian Rowshan ²
Sirus Bidarigh ²

¹ PhD Student in Agriculture, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan Branch, Lahijan, Iran

² Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan Branch, Lahijan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is one of the most valuable and economically significant oilseeds in tropical and subtropical regions, primarily grown for its oil, protein, and carbohydrates. The peanut is a summer-growing, South American legume that is well-adapted to the warmer regions of Australia. If conditions permit, it can behave as a perennial and live for multiple years. Peanuts, like other legumes, do not rely on soluble nitrogen in the soil to meet their nitrogen needs. Contrary to other legumes, this plant grows underground and has four leaflets per leaf instead of three. Typically, peanut pods consist of an outer shell containing two kernels. It is an annual plant belonging to the Leguminosae family and the Arachis genus, with a straight main root.
The peanut seed contains 43-55% oil and 25-28% protein and is rich in edible oil. Providing peanuts with nutrients in a typical manner is essential for maximizing agricultural yield. From the time of pollination until two weeks prior to harvest, peanuts will need irrigation. Lack of proper management of herbicide use and weed density is a significant factor in the reduction of peanut yield in the province of Guilan. In addition to reducing harmful environmental effects, the effective use of herbicides can provide the desired weed control at a lower cost to the region's farmers. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the herbicide R-methyl haloxyfop and the density of foxtail weeds on the yield and agricultural characteristics of peanuts in the study area.
Materials and Methods: This research was conducted in 2017 and 2018 in Astaneh Ashrafiyeh city.In terms of climate, this region was one of the temperate and humid regions. The experiment was conducted over the course of two years using a split-plot design in the form of a randomized complete block design with three replications in the field. The experiment has the main factor of the amount (dose) of the herbicide haloxyfop R-methyl in 6 spraying levels with doses of 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 L/ha the effective ingredient and secondary factor of foxtail weed density in five planting densities was including 0, 60, 120, 180 and 250 plants per square meter. Goli, a local, large-seeded cultivar and the dominant cultivar in the region, was utilized.
Results and Discussion: The evaluation of the model revealed that, at a level of 5%, the interaction effect of herbicide concentration and plant density was significant on biological yield, pods, and seeds. At a concentration of 0.4 L/ha and a density of 60 plants per square meter, an average seed yield of 2,798 Kg/ha was observed. With an average of 78.5% fruiting and 109.4 g/m²/day, the highest fruiting percentage and crop growth rate were obtained at a concentration of 0.4 L/ha and the density of the control plant. The highest seed weight and specific leaf area averaged 86,3 and 157,6 g/m2 at concentrations of 0.4 and 1.6 L/ha, respectively. At a density of 60 plants/m², the highest levels of seed oil and leaf surface index were observed, with 24% and 3.9%, respectively.
Conclusion: The results demonstrated that the interference of weeds with peanut plants decreases the leaf area index and the level of its field distribution. The herbicide haloxyfop R-methyl can significantly reduce weeds in peanut fields and improve conditions for the plant's growth. According to research findings and taking into account peanut yield, the optimal management for herbicide consumption and plant density is 0.4 liters/ha for weed-free plants and 60 plants/m²for the entire area is recommended.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Crop growth rate
Plant density
Shelling percentage
Specific leaf area

مراجع

Abdzad Gohari, A. 2021. Investigation of the effect of deficit irrigation and two irrigation methods on yield and yield components of two peanut cultivars. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture (Soil and Water Sciences.), 35(1): 61-72. (In Persian).

Abdzad Gohari, A. and Sadeghipour, O. 2019. Weed management in peanut fields. Andishmandan Pars publications, Tehran. 64 pp. (In Persian).

Ahmed, M., El Naim Mona, A., Eldouma, E., Elshiekh, A., Ibrahim, B., Moayad, I. and Zaied, M.B. 2011. influence of plant spacing and weeds on growth and yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L) in rain-fed of sudan. Advances in Life Sciences, 2: 45-48.

Akbarloo, H. 2016. Land preparation. educational research and planning organization. Compilation of technical and professional textbooks and his skills, 196 pp. (In Persian).

Azizi, Kh., Norouzian, A., Heidari, S. and Yaqubi, M. 2011. The effect of foliar application of zinc and boron elements on grain yield, yield components, some growth indices, oil content and oil content of rapeseed. Journal of Agricultural Knowledge, 3: 1-16. (In Persian).

Buchanam, G.A., Hauser, E.W., Ethredge, W.J. and Cecil, S.R. 1976. Competition of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod with peanut. II. Effects of cultivation weeds and SADH. Weed Science, 24: 29-39.

Carroll Johnson, W. 2019. A review of weed management challenges in organic peanut production. Peanut Science, 46: 56-66.

Carroll Johnson, W., Eric, P., Prostko Benjamin, G. and Mullinix, Jr. 2005. Improving the management of dicot weeds in peanut with narrow row spacings and residual herbicides. Agronomy Journal, 97: 23-32.

Chen, L., Lihua, H., Fusheng Chen, F. and Yang, C. 2020. Study on extraction of peanut protein and oil bodies by aqueous enzymatic extraction and characterization of protein. Journal of Chemistry, 7: 1-11.

Craufurrd, P.Q., Vara, P.V. and Summerfield, R.J. 2002. Dry matter production and rate of change of harvest index at high temprature in peanut. Crop Science, 42: 146-151.

Dehnavi, M. 1999. Cultivation of corn and beans and its effect on weed control. Master Thesis. School of Agriculture. University of Tehran, 136 p. (In Persian).

Donald, W.W. 2007. Control of both winter annual and summer annual weeds in no-till corn with between-row mowing systems. Weed Technology, 21: 591-601.

Drennan, D.S.H. and Jennings, E.A. 1977. Weed competition in irrigated cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in the Sudan Gezira. Weed Research, 17: 3-9.

Feakin, S.D. 1973. Pest Control in Groundnuts. 3th Ed. Center for Overseas Pest Research, London. 197 pp.

Golmohammadzadeh, S., Gherekhloo, J., Rojano-Delgado, A., Osuna, M., Kamkar, B., Ghaderi-Far, F. and De Prado, R. 2019. Identification of Phalaris brachystachys Link. resistance to haloxyfop-R-methyl herbicide from fields of Golestan province. Journal of Weed Research, 11(1): 1-16. (In Persian).

Grace, J.B. 2005. On the measurement of plant competition intendity. Ecology, 76: 305-308.

Hani, S., Saudy, I., El-Metwally, M. and Abd El-Samad Goma, A. 2020. Physio-biochemical and nutrient constituents of peanut plants under bentazone herbicide for broad-leaved weed control and water regimes in dry land areas. Journal of Arid Land, 12: 630-639.

Hauser, E., Buchanan, G.A. and Ethredge, W.J. 1975. Competition of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod with peanuts. I. Effects of periods of weed-free maintenance or weed competition. Weed Science, 23: 368-372.

Hill, L.V. and Santelmann, P.W. 1969. Competitive effects of annual weeds on Spanish peanuts. Weed Science, 17: 11-22.

Holt, J.S. 1995. Plant responses to light: A potential tool for weed management. Weed Science, 43: 474-482.

Hosseinzadeh Gashti, A., Isfahani, M., Asghari, J., Safarzadeh Vishkaei, M. and Rabiee, B. 2009. The effect of sulfur fertilizer application on growth indices and peanut yield. Agricultural Science And Technology And Natural Resources, 2(48): 27-38. (In Persian).

Jordan, D., Sarah, L., Lancaster, H., James Lanier, E., Bridget Lassiter, R. and Dewayne Johnson, P. 2009.Weed management in peanut with herbicide combinations containing imazapic and other pesticides. Weed Technology, 23(1): 6-10.

Karim Majni, H., Trust, N. and Shahbazi, S. 2012. Identification and management of weeds in green space. Publications of the Organization of Municipalities and Rural Affairs, 146 p. (In Persian).

Kjeldahl, J. 1883. A new method for the estimation of nitrogen in organic compounds. Zeitschrift für Analytische Chemie, 22: 366-382.

Makarian, H. and Rouhani, A. 2014. Determining the spatial distribution of weeds based on the damage threshold in two winter wheat fields in Shahroud region. Journal of Plant Production Research, 21(3): 51-73. (In Persian).

Makhdum, M.I., Malik, M.N.A., Din, S.U., Ahmad, F. and Chaudhry, F.I. 2002. Physiological response of cotton to methanol foliar application. Journal Research, 12(13): 37-43.

Maron, J.L. 1997. Interspecific competition and insect herbivory reduce bush lapine (Lapinus arboreus) seedling survival. Oecologia, 23(110): 284-290.

Martins, D. and Pitelli, R.A. 1994. Interfereˆncia das plantas daninhas na cultura do amendoim das aguas: efeitos de espacamentos, variedades e perodos de convivencia. Planta Daninha, 12: 87-92.

Mason, M.G. and Madin, R.W. 1996. Effect of weeds and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 36(4): 443-450.

Mirshakari, B. 2008. Efficiency of experimental competition models in simulating sugar beet yield in interfering with red root weed crown weeds. Beet Magazine, 24(2): 73-91. (In Persian).

Mirzaei, M., Makarian, H. and Arab, P. 2016. Evaluation of tolerance of common beans to methicine herbicides and haloxy fop R methyl ester. Applied Plant Medicine, 5(2): 107-115. (In Persian).

Mohammadi, Kh., Qalavand, A., Alikhani, M. and Rokhzadi, A. 2011. The effect of different methods to increase soil fertility by adding organic, chemical and biological fertilizers on canola grain yield and quality. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 3(3): 298-308. (In Persian).

Moon, B.C., Kim, J.W., Cho, S.H., Park, J.E., Song, J.S. and Kim, D.S. 2013. Modelling the effects of herbicide dose and weed density on rice-weed competition. Weed Research, 54: 484-491.

Onat, B., Bakal, H., Gulluoglu, L. and Arioglu, H. 2017. The effects of row spacing and plant density on yield and yield components of peanut grown as a double crop in Mediterranean environment in Turkey. Turk Journal Field Crops, 22: 71-80.

Randhawa, M.A., Cheema, Z.A. and Anjum Ali, M. 2002. Influence of trianthema portulacastrum infestation and nitrogen on quality of maize grain. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 4: 513-514.

Rastgoo, M., Kargar, M. and Assadolahi, H. 2015. Evaluation the possibility of reducing Haloxyfop-R-methyl ester (Gallant super®) dose by some vegetable oils in little seed canary grass (Phalaris minor Retz.). Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi), 104: 153-161. (In Persian).

Roberta, M., Donato, L., Stfen, B., Vanti, M., Clarazain, M. and Goseppe, Z. 2010.Temperature and water potential as parameters for modeling weed emergence in central- northern Italy. Weed Science, 58: 216-222.

Sahoo, S.K., Pradhan, J., Kuruwanshi, V.B., Guhey, A., Rout, G.R. and Dash, R. 2017. Phytotoxic effect of pre emergence herbicides on oil content and yield components of Groundnut (Arachis hypogeae L). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(9): 1738-1748.

Samar, S., Samunder, S.R.K., Malik, S., Vireshwaqr, R., Singh, S., Banga, S. and Singh, V. 1993. Evaluation of tank mixture of isoproturon and diclofop methyl in wheat. Integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. proc. indian society of weed science international symposium. hisar, india, 18-20 november. 2: 179-181.

Shrestha, A., Rajcan, I., Chandler, K. and Swanton, C.J. 2001. An integrated weed management strategy for glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology, 15: 517-522.

Yilmas, H.A. 1999. Effect of different plant densities of two groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotype on yield, yield components and oil and protein contents. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23: 299-308.

York, A.C. and Coble, H.D. 1977. Fall panicum interference in peanut. Weed Science, 25: 43-47.

Zand, E., Baghestani, M.A., Bitarafan, M. and Shimi, P. 2007. Guide to Herbicides Registered in Iran. Mashhad University Jihad Publications, 66 p. (In Persian).