اثرات کود دامی و الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط بر عملکرد کمی و کیفی چای ترش (Hibiscus sabdariffa) و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی (Phasaeolous vulgaris)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران

2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد زراعت، معاونت پژوهشی و فناوری، دانشگاه زابل، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری اگرواکولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، ایران

چکیده

برای بررسی اثرات کود دامی و الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط بر عملکرد کمی و کیفی چای ترش و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی، آزمایشی به‌صورت کرت­های خرد شده در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال 1392 در پژوهشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه زابل اجرا گردید. تیمارها شامل 0، 20 و 30 تن در هکتار کود دامی در کرت­های اصلی و الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط (خالص چای ترش، خالص لوبیا چشم­بلبلی، 75% چای ترش + 25% لوبیا چشم­بلبلی،50% چای ترش + 50% لوبیا چشم­بلبلی، 25% چای ترش + 75% لوبیا چشم­بلبلی) در کرت­های فرعی بودند. نتایج نشان داد که در چای ترش بیشترین ارتفاع بوته، تعداد میوه در بوته، عملکرد اقتصادی و عملکرد زیستی و در لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی حداکثر تعداد غلاف در بوته، عملکرد اقتصادی، عملکرد زیستی، درصد پروتئین دانه از کشت خالص همراه با کاربرد 30 تن در هکتار کود دامی به دست آمد. بالاترین میزان آنتوسیانین و کربوهیدرات چای ترش از کاربرد 30 تن در هکتار کود دامی و کشت مخلوط 25% چای ترش + 75% لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی حاصل شد. بالاترین شاخص برداشت در چای ترش از کشت 75% چای ترش + 25% لوبیا و در لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی از کشت خالص آن همراه با مصرف 30 تن در هکتار کود دامی حاصل شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of Manure and Different Intercropping Patterns on Quantitative and Qualitative Yield of Roselle (Hibiscus Sabdariffa) and Cowpea (Phasaeolous vulgaris)

نویسندگان [English]

  • MohammadAli Karimian 1
  • Behrooz Mir 2
  • Fatemeh Bidranameni 1
  • Abbas Keshtehgar 3
1 Agricultural Research Institute, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
2 M.Sc. Graduated in Agronomy, Deputy Research and technology, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
3 Ph.D Student, Agroecology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
چکیده [English]

In order to study the effects of manure and different intercropping patterns on quantitative and qualitative yield of roselle and cowpea, an experiment was conducted as split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications at the Agricultural Research Center of Zabol University in 2013. The treetments included 0, 20 and 30 t.ha-1 manure to main plots and different intercropping patterns (sole roselle, sole cowpea, %75 roselle + 25% cowpea, %50 roselle + %50 cowpea, and %25 roselle + %75 cowpea) in sub plots. Results revealed that in roselle the most plant height, number of fruits per plant, economic yield, biological yield and in cowpea the maximum number of pod per plant, economical yield, biologinal yield and percent seed protein of sole cropping along with application of 30 t.ha-1 manure were obtained. The highest amount anthocyanins and carbohydrates sour tea were obtained from the application of 30 t.ha-1 of manure and intercropping % 25 hibiscus + % 75 cowpea. The highest harvest index in roselle of %75 roselle + %25 cowpea and in cowpea of pure cultures along with application of 30 t.ha-1 manure were obtained.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Anthocyanin
  • Protein
  • Legumes
  • Animal manure
  • Economic yield
Abdel-Kader, M.A.I. 2012. Effect of intercropping and fertilization on some medicinal plants. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Agriculture Sciences (Horticulture Floriculture). Department of Horticulture. Faculty of Agriculture. Zagazig University. 302 Page.
Adeoye, P.A., Adebayo, S.E. and Musa. J.J. 2011. Growth and yield response of cowpea to poultry and cattle manure as amendments on sandy loam soil plot. Agricultural Journal. 6(5): 218-221.
Ahmadian, A., Ghanbari, A. and Galavi, M. 2004. The effect of consume manure on yield, yield index and quality of cumin. Abstract Article 2nd Drug Plant. Shahed University of Tehran, Iran. 27-28 January 2004. (In Persian).
Ahmadvand, G. and Hajinia, S. 2015. Ecological aspects study of replacement intercropping patterns of soybean (Glycine max L.) and millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Journal of Agroecology. 7(4): 485-498. (In Persian).
Akbarinia, A., Ghalavand, A., Tahmasbi Sarvestani, Z., Sharrifi Ashorabadi, A. and Banj Shafieei, S. 2004. Effect of different nutrition systems on soil properties, elemental uptake and seed yield of ajowan (Carum copticum L.). Pajouhesh and Sazendegi. 62: 11- 19. (In Persian)
Ali, B.H., Wabel, N.A. and Blunden, G. 2005. Phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological aspects of Hibiscus sabdariffa L: a review. Phytotherapy Research. 19(5): 369-375.
Alizadeh, Y., Koocheki, A. and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2010. Investigation of growth characteristics, yield, yield components and potential weed control in intercropping of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and vegetative sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Journal of Agroecology. 2: 383-397.
Aminifar, J., Ramroudi, M., Galavi M. and Mohsenabadi G.R. 2017. Advantage of sesame and cowpea intercrops in different fertilizer application systems. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 10 (4): 1039-1054.
Arje, J. 2007. Evaluating the intercropping of forage sorghum and hairy vetch at different levels of N fertilizer and planting patterns. MSc Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian).
Avis, T.J., Grave, V., Antoun, H. and Tweddell, R.J. 2008. Multifaceted beneficial effects of rhizosphere microorganisms on plant health and productivity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 40: 1733-1740.
Aziz Eman, E., Gad, N. and Badran, M. 2007. Effect of cobalt and nickel on plant growth, yield and flavonoids content of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 1(2): 73-78.
Carsky R.J., Singh B.B. and Oyewole B. 2001. Contribution of early season cowpea to late season maize in the savanna zone of west africa. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. 18: 303-316.
Clairmont, K.B., Hagar, W.G. and Davis, E.A. 1986. Manganese toxicity to chlorophyll synthesis in tobacco callus. Plant Physiology. 80: 291-293.
Darbaghshahi, M.N., Banitaba, A. and Bahari, B. 2012. Evaluating the possibility of saffron and chamomile mixed culture. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 7(20): 3060-3065.
Ebrahimzadeh Abdashti, R., Galavi, M. and Ramroudi. M. 2016. Effects of organic and chemical fertilizers on some quantitative Traits and anthocyanin of roselle under Zabol conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science. 30(2): 169-177. (In Persian).
Echarte, L., Della Maggiora, A., Cerrudo, D., Gonzalez, V.H., Abbate, P., Cerrudo, A., Sadras, V.O. and Calvino, P. 2011. Yield response to plant density of maize and sunflower intercropped with soybean. Field Crops Research. 121: 423-429.
Fallahi, J., Koocheki, A.R. and Rezvani Moghaddam, P. 2009. Effects of biofertilizers on quantitative and qualitative yield of chamomile (Matricaria recutita) as a medicinal plant. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 7(1): 127- 135. (In Persian).
Gendy A.S.H., Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H. and Mahmoud A.A. 2012. Growth, Productivity and chemical constituents of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) plants as influenced by cattle manure and biofertilizers treatments. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 6(5): 1-12.
Ghanbari-Bonjar, A. and Lee, H.C. 2003. Intercropped wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and bean (Vicia faba L.) as whole-crop forage: effect of harvest time on forage yield and quality. Grass and Forage Science. 58: 28–36.
Gholinejhad, E. and Rezaei- Chiyaneh, E. 2014. Evaluation of grain yield and quality of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) in intercropping with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 16(3): 236-249. In Persian.
Ghosh, P.K., Mohanty, M., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Painuli D.K. and Misra. A.K. 2004. Growth, competition, yields advantage and economics in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system in semi-arid tropics of India II. Effect of nutrient management. Field Crops Research. 96: 90-97.
Gustave, N.M., Jean, F., Ois, L. and Xavier, D. 2008. Shoot and root competitiom in potato/maize intercropping, Effects on growth and yield. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 64: 180- 188.
Hapkins, W.G. 1999. Introductin to plant physiology. Vol 1 and 2, John wiley and Sons, New York.
Hector, V. and Jody, S. 2002. Cowpea. Cooperative Extension Service. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. University of Hawaii.
Hosseini, S.M.B., Mazaheri, D., Jahansouz, M.R. and Yazdi Samadi. B. 2004. The effects of nitrogen levels on yield and yield components of forage millet (Pennisetum americanum) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in intercropping system. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi. 59: 60-67.
Jindal, S.K. and Gupta. B.S. 1984. Component analysis of yield in cowpea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 54: 183-185.
Keshtehgar, A., Dahmardeh, M., Galavi, M. and Khammari, I. 2015. Evaluation of yield and yield components of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in intercropping with maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy Journal. 23(107). 115-123. (In Persian)
Khatamipour, M., Asgharipour, M.R. and Sirousmehr, A.R. 2014. Intercropping benefits of foxtail millet (Setaria Italica) with mungbean (Vigna radiata) as influenced by application of different manure levels. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 24(3): 75-86. University of Tabriz. (In Persian).
Kolawale, G.O., Tian. G. and Singh, B.B. 2000. Differential response of cowpea varieties to aluminium and phosphorus application. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 23: 731-740.
Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Mondani, F., Feizi, H. and Amirmoradi, S. 2009. Evaluation of radiation interception and use by maize and bean intercropping canopy. Journal of Agroecology. 13-23. (In Persian with English Summary).
Koocheki, A., Fallahpour, F., Khorramdel, S. and Jafari, L. 2014. Intercropping wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with canola (Brassica napus L.) and their effects on yield, yield components, weed density and diversity. Journal of Agroecology. 6(1): 11-20. (In Persian).
Majidian, M., Ghalavand, A., Karimian, N. and Kamgar Haghighi, A.A. 2008. Effects of moisture stress, nitrogen fertilizer, manure and integrated nitrogen and manure fertilizer on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of SC704 corn. Journal Science Technology Agriculture Natural Resource. 45: 417-433. (In Persian).
Marschner, H. 2003. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.
Momen keykha, M. 2014. Evaluation of ecophysiological aspects of cyamopsis and sunflower intercropping under different levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Thesis Master agro-ecology. Faculty of Agriculture. University of Zabol. 126 p. (In Persian).
Mushagalusa, G.N., Ledent, J.F. and Draye, X. 2008. Shoot and root competition in potato/maize intercropping: effects on growth and yield. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 64: 180-188.
Naghizade, M., Ramroodi, M., Galavi, M., Siahsar, B.A., Heydari, M. and Maghsoodi, A.A. 2012. The Effects of various phosphorus fertilizers on yield and yield components of maize and grass pea intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Sciences. 43(2): 203-215. (In Persian).
Najafi, N., Mostafaei, M., Dabbagh, A. and Oustan, S. 2013. Effect of intercropping and farmyard manure on the growth, yield and protein concentration of corn, bean and bitter vetch. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science. 23(1). 99-115. (In Persian)
Namdari, M. and Mahmoudi, S. 2013. Evaluation of yield and productivity indices in planting ratios of intercropping of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 14(4): 346-357. (In Persian)
Nemati, M. and Dahmardeh, M. 2015. Effect of biofertilizer and organic manure application on yield and morphological index of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). Journal of Agroecology. 7(1): 62-73. (In Persian)
Parsaiemehr, N., Ghanbari A. and Dahmardeh, M. 2014. The effects of methanol foliar and manure on quantitative and qualitative yield of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) at different plant density. Crop Science Research in Arid Regions. 1(1): 47-69. (In Persian)
Philipp, A. 2009. What is sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence of diverging views in Switzerland and New Zealand. Journal Ecological Economics. 68(6): 1872-1882.
Raeesi, M. 2009. Study the effects of different levels of manure and drought stress on qualitative and quantitative yield roselle in Jiroft. Master Thesis Agronomy. University of Zabol. Faculty of Agriculture. 71 p. (In Persian).
Raei, Y., Bolandnazar, S.A. and Dameghsi, N. 2011. Evaluation of common bean and potato densities effects on potato tuber yield in mono-cropping and intercropping systems. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 21(2): 131-142. (In Persian)
Reyhan, M.K., and Amiraslani. F. 2006. Studying the relationship between vegetation and physico-chemical properties of soil, case study: Tabas region, Iran. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 5: 169-171.
Rezaei-Chianeh, E., Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab, A., Shakiba, M.R., Ghassemi-Golezani, K. and Aharizad, S. 2011. Intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) at different plant population densities. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 7: 1786-1793.
Rezends, G.D.S.P. and Ramalho, M.A. 1994. Competitive ability of maize and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars intercropped in different environments. Journal of agricultural science Cambridge. 123: 185-190.
Rezvani Moghadam, P. and Moradi, R. 2013. Evaluation of planting date, biological fertilizer and intercropping on yield and essence quantity of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Iran. Journal of Crop Science. 43(2): 217-230. (In Persian with English abstract).
Sarlak, S.h. and Aghaalikhani, M. 2009. Effect of plant density and mixing ratio on crop yeild in sweet corn (Zea mays L. var Saccharata) and mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) intercropping. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 11 (4): 367-38. (in Persian).
Scarisbrick, D.H., Wilkes, D.M. and Kempsor, R. 1977. The effect of varying plant population density on the seed yield of navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in south-east England. Journal of agricultural science Cambridge. 88: 567-577.
Singh B.B., Ajeigbe, H.A., Tarawali, S.A., Fernandez-Rivera, S. and Abubakar M. 2003. Improving the production and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Field crops Research. 84: 169-177.
Tavassolli, A., Ghanbari, A., Ahmadi, M. and Heydari, M. 2010. The effect of fertilizer and manure on forage and grain yield of millet (Panicum miliaceum) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in intercropping. Journal of Field Crops Research. 8(2): 203-212.
Tuna, C. and Orak, A. 2007. The role of intercropping on yield potential of common vetch/oat cultivated in pure stand and mixtures. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 2: 14-19.
Vandermeer, J.H. 1990. Intercropping. In: Agroecology. Mc Graw–Hill publishing Co. pp. 481-516.
Wagner, 1979. Content and Vacuole/Extravacuole Distribution of Neutral Sugars, Free Amino Acids, and Anthocyanin in Protoplasts. Plant Physiology. 64, 88-93.
Yolcu, H., Gunes, A., Dasci, M., Turan, M. and Serin, Y. 2010. The effects of solid, liquid and  combined cattle manure applications on the yield, quality and mineral contents of common vetch and barley intercropping mixture. Ekoloji. 19 (75): 71-81.
Zaffaroni, E., Vasconcelos A.F.M. and Lopes, E.B. 1991. Evaluation of intercropping cassava/corn/bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in north Brazil. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 167: 207-212.
Zhang, G., Yang Z. and Dong, S. 2011. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crop Research. 124: 66-73.