مطالعه واکنش برخی از ژنوتیپ‌های کنجد به تنش خشکی در شرایط آب و هوایی مهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران

2 گروه اصلاح نباتات و بیوتکنولوژی، دانشکده تولید گیاهی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

3 موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

چکیده

منطقه مهران از مناطق کشت کنجد در کشور می­باشد. هدف از این مطالعه کشت ارقام کنجد در منطقه مهران در سال زراعی 1401 در شرایط آبی و تنش خشکی به منظور شناسایی ارقام برتر از لحاظ عملکرد و متحمل به تنش خشکی است. 14 رقم کنجد به صورت کرت­های خرد شده در قالب طرح پایه بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقات کشاورزی دانشگاه ایلام در مهران کاشته شد. عامل اصلی شامل بدون تنش و تنش خشکی و عامل فرعی ژنوتیپ­های کنجد بود. آبیاری در محیط آبی براساس 100 و در محیط تنش براساس 200 میلی­متر تبخیر از تشتک تبخیر انجام شد. صفات اندازه­گیری شده عملکرد اقتصادی، تعداد کپسول در بوته، تعداد شاخه فرعی، تعداد برگ، طول کپسول، عرض کپسول، وزن تر و خشک کپسول و ارتفاع بوته بودند. ژنوتیپ­های مورد مطالعه از لحاظ کلیه صفات تفاوت معنی­داری با یکدیگر در هر دو محیط آبی و تنش داشتند. تنش بر کلیه صفات به استثنای طول کپسول، تعداد برگ، تعداد کپسول در بوته و تعداد شاخه فرعی تأثیر­ داشت. در شرایط آبی رقم یلووات بیشترین و رقم ناشکوفا کمترین عملکرد را داشتند. در شرایط تنش رقم هلیل دارای بیشترین و ناز چند شاخه دارای کمترین عملکرد بودند. شاخص­های GMP، STI و MP بیشترین همبستگی را با عملکرد در شرایط آبی و تنش داشتند و لذا به عنوان بهترین شاخص انتخاب شدند. با استفاده از بای پلات دشتستان2، شوین و هلیل به عنوان ژنوتیپ­های با عملکرد بالا در محیط بدون تنش و با تنش معرفی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Response of some sesame genotypes to drought stress in Mehran climate

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Tahmasebi 1
  • Hossein Mohammadi Dehballaee 2
  • Maryam Mahmoodi 3
1 Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran
2 Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Department, , Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
3 Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) is an annual plant and an ancient plant that has been cultivated in Asia and Africa for about 7500 years. Sesame seeds contains 40-60% oil and for this reason, it is cultivated as an oil plant in many countries. Drought is a serious problem for crop production in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. One of the most important research programs in drought management in different plants is the identification and grouping of sensitive, drought-tolerant genotypes. Mehran region in Ilam province is one of the sesame growing regions in the country. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to cultivate sesame cultivars in Mehran under drought non- stress and stress  conditions in order to identify superior cultivars in terms of yield and tolerance to drought stress.
Materials and Methods: 14 sesame cultivars were planted in the form of a split-plot design based on a randomized complete block with three replications in the Agricultural Research Farm of Ilam University in Mehran. The main factor of irrigation levels included irrigation after 100 mm of evaporation from the class a pan (conventional irrigation) and irrigation after 200 mm of evaporation from the class a pan, and the secondary factor was the studied sesame genotypes. Traits were measured based on 10 plants harvested from two central lines and taking into account the marginal effect. The measured traits were economic yield and number of capsules per plant, number of sub-branches, number of leaves, capsule length, capsule width, capsule weight and plant height. In order to determine resistant and sensitive cultivars to stress, various indices related to stress resistance were calculated.
Results and Discussion: The studied genotypes showed a significant difference in terms of the traits measured in the conditions of no stress and drought stress. The results of the table show that the effect of irrigation for the characteristics of capsule fresh weight, seed weight and capsule width showed a significant difference at the level of 1% and for capsule dry weight and plant height showed a significant difference at the level of 5%. Which indicates that the studied traits change under stress conditions. Other traits did not have significant differences. In the evaluation of tolerance to drought stress in different genotypes of sesame, plant height, biological yield and grain yield per surface unit decreased significantly with increasing drought stress intensity. According to the correlation of performance under stress (YS) and no stress (YP) conditions with drought tolerance indices, GMP, STI and MP indices have a correlation coefficient of 0.93, 0.905 and 0.853, respectively. Performance as the best indicators of drought tolerance in stress conditions and MP, GMP, STI and TOL indicators with correlation coefficient of 0.984, 0.935, 0.925 and 0.735 respectively with performance as the best indicator. The tolerances were under stress-free conditions. These indices can be used to identify genotypes tolerant to water stress with high yield. Based on this, Holeil variety is introduced as the most tolerant variety to drought stress.
Conclusion:  In water conditions, the cultivar Yellow white had the highest yield and the cultivar Nashkofa had the lowest yield. Under stress conditions, Holeil variety had the highest yield and Nazmultib had the lowest yield. GMP, STI and MP indices had the highest correlation with performance in water and stress conditions and therefore were chosen as the best indices. Based on this, Holeil variety is introduced as the most tolerant variety to drought stress.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Correlation
  • Drought tolerance index
  • Holeil
  • Yield
Afshari, F., Golkar, P. and Mohammadinejad, G., 2015. Evaluation of drought tolerance in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes at different growth stages. Arid Biome Scientific and Research Journal, 4(2), pp.90-95. [In Persian]. doi: 20.1001.1.2008790.1393.4.2.8.9
Asadi, H., Baradaran, R., Seghatoleslami, M.J. and Mousavi, S.G., 2021. Evaluation of drought tolerance in some sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes based on stress tolerance indices. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 18(4), pp.413-433. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/JCESC.2020.88165
Baraki, F., Gebregergis, Z., Belay, Y., Berhe, M., Teame, G., Hassen, M., Gebremedhin, Z., Abadi, A., Negash, W., Atsbeha, A. and Araya, G., 2020. Multivariate analysis for yield and yield-related traits of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes. Heliyon6(10), p.e05295. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05295
Blum, A., 2015. Stress, strain, signaling, and adaptation –not just a matter of definition. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67(3), pp.562-565. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv497
Boureima, S., Diouf, M., Amoukou, A.I. and Damme, V.P., 2016. Screening for sources of tolerance to drought in sesame induced mutants: Assessment of indirect selection criteria for seed yield. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience, 4, pp.45-60. doi: 10.18782/2320-7051.2218
Bray, E.A., 1997. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Science2(2), pp.48-54. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(97)82562-9
Dahie-Zehi, F., Ramroudi, M. and Raissi, A., 2022. Investigation of Some Morphological Traits, Yield, Yield Components, and Oil Percentage of Sesame Genotypes under Drought Stress Conditions. Journal of Crops Improvement24(1), pp.41-51. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/jci.2021.316826.2499
Eshghi, A. Gh., Muzaffari, J. and Azizov, A., 2011. Evaluation of different sesame genotypes in terms of tolerance to limited irrigation conditions using multivariate analysis methods. First National Congress of Advanced Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Zanjan University, 10-21 September. pp.58 [In Persian].
Eskandari, H., Zehtab Salmasi, S. and Ghasemi Golezami, K., 2009. Evaluation of water use efficiency and grain yield of sesame cultivars as a second crop under different irrigation regimes. Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(1), pp.39-51. [In Persian]. doi: 20.1001.1.24764310.1389.20.1.4.5
Fernandez, G.C., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Aug. 13-16, Shanhua, Taiwan.
Fischer, R.A. and Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research29(5), pp.897-912. doi: 10.1071/ar9780897.
Gharibeshghi, A. and Mansoori, S., 2006. Response of sesame to water deficit. The first international conference on the theory and practical in biological water saving, 6-8 Dec, Beijing. China. pp.110-111.
Hassanzadeh, M., Ebadi, A., Panahyan-e-Kivi, M., Jamaati-e-Somarin, S., Saeidi, M. and Gholipouri, A., 2009. Investigation of water stress on yield and yield components of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in Moghan region. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3(2), pp.239-244. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/ijfcs.2017.214318.654179
Kadkhodaie, A., Razmjoo, J., Zahedi, M. and Pessarakli, M., 2014. Oil content and composition of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes as affected by irrigation regimes. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 91, pp.1737-1744. [In Persian]. doi: 10.1007/S11746-014-2524-0
Khajehpour, M.R., 2004. Industrial plants. Isfahan University of Technology Press. pp.564 . [In Persian].
Langham, D.R., 2007. Phenology of sesame. In Issues in New Crops and New Uses; Janick, J., Whipkey, A., Eds.; ASHS Press: Alexandria, VA, USA, pp.144-182.
Pandey, B.B., Ratnakumar, P., Usha Kiran, B., Dudhe, M.Y., Lakshmi, G.S., Ramesh, K. and Guhey, A., 2021. Identifying traits associated with terminal drought tolerance in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes. Frontiers in Plant Science12, p.739896. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.739896
Pathak, N., Rai, A.K., Kumari, R., Thapa, A. and Bhat, K.V., 2014. Sesame crop: An underexploited oilseed holds tremendous potential for enhanced food value. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 5, pp.519-529. doi: 10.4236/as.2014.56054
Reddy, O.U.K. and Doraiaj, M.S., 1994. Path coefficient analysis in sesame. Madras Agriculture of Journal, 81, pp.446-447. doi: 10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i1831075
Rosielle, A.A. and Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoretical aspect of selection for yield in stress and Non-Stress Environment. Crop Science, 21(6), pp.943-946. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
Salehi, M. and Saedi, C., 2010. Multivariate analysis of yield and yield components in four Sesame cultivars. 3th International congress of oilseed, pp. 85-86. [In Persian].
Sio-Se Mardeh, A., A. Ahmadi, K. Poustini and V. Mohammadi. 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditioning. Field Crops Research, pp.222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.02.001
Sravanthi, A.L., Ratnakumar, P., Reddy, S.N., Eswari, K.B., Pandey, B.B., Manikanta, C.H.L.N., Ramya, K.T., Sonia, E., Mohapatra, S., Gopika, K. and Anusha, P.L., 2021. Morpho-physiological, quality traits and their association with seed yield in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) indigenous collection under deficit moisture stress. Plant Physiology Reports, pp.1-11. doi: 10.1007/s40502-021-00621-0
Sun, J., Rao, Y., Yan, T., Yan, X., Zhou, H., 2010. Effects of drought stress on sesame growth and yield characteristics and comprehensive evaluation of drought tolerance. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 32(4), pp.525-33.
Zabet, M., Hosein Zade, A.H., Ahmadi, A. and Khialparast, F., 2003. Effect of water stress on different traits and determination of the best water stress index in Mung Bean (Vigna radiata). Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 34(4), pp.889-898. [In Persian].
Zabet, M. and Samadzadeh, A.R., 2014. Evaluation of tolerance to water stress in some sesame genotypes. Applied Crop Breeding2(2), pp.185-197. [In Persian].
دوره 5، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 11
این شماره با همکاری انجمن علمی دانش کشاورزی گرمسیری ایران منتشر شده است
اسفند 1402
صفحه 591-604
  • تاریخ دریافت: 10 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 16 مرداد 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 مرداد 1402