Crop Science Research in Arid Regions

Crop Science Research in Arid Regions

The effect of cover crops on density, biomass and species diversity of weeds in three soybean cultivars

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Deptartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
2 Deptartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Soybean (Glycine max L.), with 20% oil and 40% protein, is economically one of the most important plants of the legume family and has the largest cultivated area among the plants of this family. Weeds are the most important factor in reducing crop yield and the main limiting factor in optimal soybean production. Improper use of herbicides may also lead to problems such as herbicide residues, groundwater contamination, and weed resistance. Therefore, it is important to adopt appropriate management solutions that do not include the above problems. One of the non-chemical solutions for weed management is the use of cover crops. Cover crops are effective in suppressing weed biomass. Considering the serious problems caused by the competition of weeds with soybean in Golestan province and the significant decrease in soybean yield, this research was conducted with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of cowpea, mung bean, and millet cover crops in the management of weeds of three soybean cultivars in Golestan province.
Materials and Methods: A factorial experiment was conducted as a randomized complete blocks design in three replications in Gorgan and Aliabad Katoul, Golestan province, in the crop year of 2018-2019. The test factors were soybean cultivars in three levels, Saman, Katoul and Sari as the first factor and six levels of weed management including pure soybean cultivation with herbicide use, pure soybean cultivation with weeding operations, simultaneous cultivation of mung bean cover crops (Vigna radiata L.) together with soybean, cowpea cover crops (Vigna unguiculata L.) together with soybean and of millet cover crop (Panicum miliaceum L.) together with soybean and pure soybean cultivation without any management operations (control) infested with weeds, was considered as the second factor. Height, density and dry weight of weeds were measured three times, 5, 10 and 15 weeks during the growing season. The data obtained were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS software version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The significant differences among the treatments were determined by the least significant difference (LSD) test (p< 0.05). Figures were drawn by Excel 2019.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that the highest percentage of reduction in dry weight, leaf area, height, number of species and density of weeds compared to the control was related to the treatments of cover crops, and the lowest percentage of dry weight, leaf area, height, number of species and density of weeds was 71.67, 64.27, 57.71, 44.71 and 70.91% belonged to herbicide treatment respectively. The highest soybean grain yields were observed in the amount of 26.36%, respectively, compared to the control treatment in Saman cultivar in Aliabad under the conditions of weeding. The highest uniformity index with 0.69 was obtained from Gorgan, which showed 32.69% more uniformity than Aliabad. Also, the highest Peleo species richness index with 0.95% was obtained from Aliabad, which was 9.27% ​​more than Gorgan. The highest Sorensen similarity index with 0.6867 and 0.4622% was obtained from herbicide and weeding treatments, and the lowest amount of this index was observed in the treatment of mung bean, cowpea and millet cover crops with 0.0556%. The highest uniformity index of Saman with mung bean cover crop treatment and Sari with millet cover crop treatment was 0.98% and 0.973%, respectively, and the lowest uniformity index of Ketol with herbicide management treatment was 0.841%. The highest index of menhinic richness was obtained from the treatment of Saman in cowpea cover crop, and Katoul in mung bean cover crop (1.064%), and the lowest index was obtained Saman in weeding management (0.791%), which is statistically similar to the treatments Mung bean cover crop in Saman and Katoul cultivars, and the treatments cowpea cover crop in Katoul and Sari cultivars were in the same group.
Conclusion: The most favorable treatment for Weed Control Efficiency and the highest percentage of reduction in dry weight, leaf area, and height, number of species, and density of weeds was simultaneous cultivation of cover crops, and the lowest amount of all these traits was obtained in the herbicide treatment.
Keywords

Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Cheng, K., Yue, Q., Chadwick, D. and Espenberg, M., 2019. A critical review of the impacts of cover crops on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balance and crop productivity. Global Change Biology, 25, pp.2530–2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14644
Adler, M.J. and Chase, C.A., 2007. Comparison of the allelopathic potential of leguminous summer cover crops: cowpea, sunn hemp, and velvetbean. HortScience, 42, pp.289–293. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.42.2.289
Alvarez, R., Steinbach, H.S. and De Paepe, J.L., 2017. Cover crop effects on soils and subsequent crops in the pampas: A meta-analysis. Soil and Tillage Research, 170, pp.53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.03.005
Amira, A.E.M. and Amany, K.E.H., 2023. Eco-friendly treatments for weed control in maize fields intercropped with cowpea. Environment, Biodiversity & Soil Security, 7, pp.149–161. https://doi.org/10.21608/jenvbs.2023.219835.1222
Baei, E., Siahmarguee, A., Gherekhloo, J. and Kazemi, H., 2023. Effect of summer cover crops and row spacing on weed management, yield and its components of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Scientific Research Journal of Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production, 32(4), pp.33–50. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2021.47570.2724
Barnes, B.V., 1998. Forest ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 773 p.
Blanco-Canqui, H., Shaver, T.M., Lindquist, J.L., Shapiro, C.A., Elmore, R.W., Francis, C.A. and Hergert, G.W., 2015. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agronomy Journal, 107, pp.2449–2474. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
Bourgeois, B., Charles, A., Van Eerd, L.L., Tremblay, N., Lynch, D., Bourgeois, G., Bastien, M., Bélanger, V., Landry, C. and Vanasse, A., 2022. Interactive effects between cover crop management and the environment modulate benefits to cash crop yields: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 102, pp.656–678. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2021-0177
Christopher, A., Landau, A., Aaron, G., Hager, B., Martin, M. and Williams, II., 2022. Deteriorating weed control and variable weather portends greater soybean yield losses in the future. Science of the Total Environment, 830, 154764. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2021-0177
Dadashi, F., 2013. Soybean and wheat cover crops affects on weed control of corn under different fertilizer sources. MSc thesis. Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Iran. [In Persian].
Fernando, M. and Shrestha, A., 2023. The potential of cover crops for weed management: A sole tool or component of an integrated weed management system? Plants, 12(4), p.752. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040752
General Directorate of Meteorology of Golestan Province (GDMGP), 2022. Meteorological data of Golestan Province. Gorgan, Iran.
Ghanbari, A., Ghadiri, H. and Jokar, M., 2006. Effect of intercropping of maize and cucumber on controlling weeds. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi in Agronomy and Horticulture, 73, pp.193–199. [In Persian].
Heap, I., 2023. The International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. Online. Available at: www.weedscience.org
Hu, T., Fang, H., Pan, Q., Xu, H., Lv, T., Fan, X., Wang, Y., Guo, Y., Mou, L. and Xu, J., 2024. Seed microbiome-mediated herbicide resistance evolution in weeds. New Phytologist, 242, pp.333–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19459
Hulme, P.E., 2023. Weed resistance to different herbicide modes of action is driven by agricultural intensification. Field Crops Research, 292, 108819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108819
Jiang, K., Wu, B., Wang, C. and Ran, Q., 2019. Ecotoxicological effects of metals with different concentrations and types on the morphological and physiological performance of wheat. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 167(15), pp.345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.048
Jin, H., Yang, X., Zhao, H., Song, X., Tsvetkov, Y.D., Wu, Y., Gao, Q., Zhang, R. and Zhang, J., 2023. Genetic analysis of protein content and oil content in soybean by genome-wide association study. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1182771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1182771
Kim, I.S., Kim, C.H. and Yang, W.S., 2021. Physiologically active molecules and functional properties of soybeans in human health-a current perspective. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(8), p.4054. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084054
Krstic, J., Malidza, G., Rajkovic, M. and Krstic, M., 2021. Influence of different methods for breaking seed dormancy of Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Abutilon theophrasti and Xanthium strumarium on emergence in field conditions. Acta Herbol, 1, pp.29–37. https://doi.org/10.5937/actaherb2101029k
Kumar, V., Singh, V., Flessner, M.L., Haymaker, J., Reiter, M.S. and Mirsky, S.B., 2023. Cover crop termination options and application of remote sensing for evaluating termination efficiency. PLOS One, 18(4), p.e0284529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284529
Landau, C.A., Hager, A.G. and Williams, M.M., 2022. Deteriorating weed control and variable weather portends greater soybean yield losses in the future. Science of the Total Environment, 830, p.154764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154764
Li, Y., Guo, R., Liang, X., Yao, B., Yan, S.H., Han, Y. and Cui, J., 2023. Pollution characteristics, ecological and health risks of herbicides in a drinking water source and its inflowing rivers in North China. Environmental Pollution, 334, 122130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122130
Mafakheri, S., Ardakani, M.R., Mighani, F., Mirhadi, M.J. and Vazan, S., 2010. Rye cover crop management affects weeds and yield of corn (Zea mays L.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38(3), pp.117–123. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha3834726
Magurran, A.E., 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Magurran, A.E., 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 256 p.
Mehdipour, H., Abbasi, R. and Abbasian, A., 2019. Effect of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) cover crop density on seed yield and yield components of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and weed control. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29, pp.255–266. [In Persian].
Menhinick, E.F., 1964. A comparison of some species-individuals diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology, 45, pp.859–861. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934933
Mohammadi Golrang, B., Gazanchian, G.H., Ramzani Moghadam, R., Falahati, H., Rouhani, H. and Mashayekhi, M., 2008. Estimation of forage yields of some range plant species by plant height and diameter measurements. Journal of Range and Desert Research, 15(2), pp.158–178. [In Persian].
Olson, K., Ebelhar, S.A. and Lang, J.M., 2014. Long-term effects of cover crops on crop yields, soil organic carbon stocks and sequestration. Open Journal of Soil Science, 4(8), pp.284–292. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2014.48030
Osipitan, O.A., Dille, J.A., Assefa, Y., Radicetti, E., Ayeni, A. and Knezevic, S.Z., 2018. Impact of cover crop management on level of weed suppression: A meta-analysis. Crop Science, 59(3), pp.833–842. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.09.0589
Peet, R.K., 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5(1), pp.285–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001441
Radicetti, E., Mancinelli, R. and Campiglia, E., 2013. Impact of managing cover crop residues on the floristic composition and species diversity of the weed community of pepper crop (Capsicum annuum L.). Crop Protection, 44, pp.109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.017
Rastgoo, S., Ayneband, A. and Fateh, A., 2012. Study of characteristics of weed communities in sesame and mung bean mixed system using diversity indices. The Second National Organic and Conventional Agriculture Congress, Ardabil. [In Persian].
Ritchie, H., 2021. Is our appetite for soy driving deforestation in the Amazon? Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/soy
Savarinejad, A., Yunes Abadi, M. and Habibian, L., 2014. Introduction of new invasive weeds in soybean fields of Golestan province. Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of Golestan Province, pp.1–18. [In Persian].
Shannon, C.E. and Wiener, W., 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, 350 p.
Shitikova, A.V., Zarenkova, N.V. and Negassi, B.T., 2024. Soybean yield in mixed crops. BIO Web of Conferences, 82, p.02015. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20248202015
Somani, L.L., 1992. Dictionary of weed science. Agronomy Publishing Academy, India.
Stefanić, E.R., Rašić, S., Lučić, P., Tolić, S., Zima, D., Antunović, S., Japundžić-Palenkić, B. and Stefanić, I., 2022. Weed community in soybean responses to agricultural management systems. Agronomy, 12, p.2846. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112846
Subhra Sahoo, A., Mahmoud, F., Seleiman, B.C., Dhirendra Kumar Roy, A., Shivani Ranjan, A., Sumit Sow, A., Raj Kumar Jat, D., Bushra, A., Alhammad, E. and Harun Gitari, F., 2024. Conservation agriculture and weed management effects on weed community and crop productivity of a rice-maize rotation. Heliyon, 10, e31554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31554
Turner, N.C., 1981. Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water stress. Plant and Soil, 58, pp.339–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02180062
Tursun, N., Işık, D., Demir, Z. and Jabran, K., 2018. Use of living, mowed, and soil-incorporated cover crops for weed control in apricot orchards. Agronomy, 8(8), p.150. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8080150
Uchino, H., Iwama, K., Jitsuyama, Y., Ichiyama, K., Sugiura, E. and Yudate, T., 2011. Stable characteristics of cover crops for weed suppression in organic farming systems. Plant Production Science, 14, pp.75–85. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.14.75
Ullah, R., Aslam, Z., Attia, H., Sultan, K.H., Alamer, K.H.H., Mansha, M.Z., Althobaiti, A.T., Al Kashgry, A.T.N., Algethami, B. and Zaman, Q.U., 2022. Sorghum allelopathy: Alternative weed management strategy and its impact on mung bean productivity and soil rhizosphere properties. Life, 12(9), p.1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12091359
Waring, E., Licht, M., Ripley, E., Staudt, A., Carlson, S. and Helmers, M., 2023. Cover crop mixtures versus single species: Water quality and cash crop yield. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 78(1), pp.1–15. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2023.00174
Woghirena, A.I., Awodoyin, R.O., Antiabong, C.I., Ngonadi, E.N., Jeminiwa, O.R. and Olaoti-Laaro, S.O., 2021. Effects of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) as a live mulch on weed management in maize cropping. Nigerian Journal of Weed Science, 38(1), pp.61–67. https://doi.org/10.4314/njb.v38i1.7
Woyessa, D., 2022. Weed control methods used in agriculture. American Journal of Life Science and Innovation (AJLSI), 1(1), pp.19–26. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajlsi.v1i1.413
Yousefi, M., Dray, A. and Ghazoul, J., 2024. Assessing the effectiveness of cover crops on ecosystem services: A review of the benefits, challenges, and trade-offs. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 22(1), p.2335106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2024.2335106
Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 20
Spring 2026
Pages 203-222

  • Receive Date 09 August 2025
  • Revise Date 30 December 2025
  • Accept Date 02 January 2026