Crop Science Research in Arid Regions

Crop Science Research in Arid Regions

Study the effect of the using of mycorrhiza and different levels of manure and chemical fertilizers on some traits of forage cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica L.)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Student in Agronomy, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
3 Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, attention has been paid to forage cactus as a plant resistant to drought conditions and as an obstacle against desertification and diversification of vegetation in low rainfall ranges. The use of Opuntia ficus-indica pads as forage for cattle in the semi-arid and arid regions of the world, especially in periods of time when there is a lack of quality and quantity of fodder in the ranges, is important. Considering the importance of producing fodder plants and improving their quality under the influence of different fertilizer inputs, this experiment aims to investigate the effect of different proportions of biological, chemical and animal fertilizers and their interaction on the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of forage cactus and determine the optimal fertilizer level for this plant in the city, It was done in Khorram Abad, Lorestan.
Materials and Methods: In order to investigate the effect of using biological, chemical and livestock fertilizers on Separate and combined tests were carried out on some forage cactus traits during two cropping years (2019 and 2020). The size of each plot was 6 square meters (4 x 1.5) with 4 crop lines and the plant density was 3.33 per each square meter. The main pad for planting was prepared from a three-year base and were prepared and transferred from the research farm affiliated to ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas) in Mehran city, belonging to the Agricultural Research Center of Ilam province. The experiment was conducted in the research farm of Lorestan University's Faculty of Agriculture as a factorial in the form of a randomized complete block design with 32 treatments and 3 replications. Experimental factors include biological fertilizer (mycorrhiza) at 2 levels (use and non-use of mycorrhiza), manure at 4 levels (0, 10, 20 and 30 tons per hectare) and nitrogen fertilizer at 4 levels(0, 100, 200 and 300 kilograms per hectare).  The qualitative traits included NDF, ADF, CF, ASH and CP, which were measured using a near infrared spectrometer )NIR(, (model DA 7250: manufactured by Perten Sweden) measurements were made at wavelengths between 700 and 2500 nm.
(All the measurements for the quality of traits were done in the central laboratory of Lorestan University).
Quantitative analysis of the data after Bartlett's test was done with SAS software Version (9.4) by compound analysis method for all traits (except wet and dry yield which were one year old), to draw graphs from Excel software and to compare the averages from the test LSD was used at a significant level of 5%.
Results and Discussion: The percentage of crude protein, ash, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and crude fiber, fresh and dry yield was influenced by the use of manure and nitrogen fertilizer, and the simple effect and the interaction effect of the combined use of different levels of  manure and nitrogen fertilizer on this trait were also significant at the level of one percent.
The highest fresh forage yield and dry yield were obtained in the treatment of combined use of 300 kg of nitrogen fertilizer + 30 tons per hectare of manure in comparison with the control treatment (no use of fertilizer) with the lowest amount. The percentage of crude protein and fodder ash increased by 83.05% and 88.26% respectively in this treatment, and the percentage of traits reducing the quality of fodder, including neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and crude fiber showed the highest decrease compared to the control treatment, showed. Based on the results of the present research, the combined use of manure and chemical fertilizers led to the improvement of quantitative and qualitative traits in forage cactus. Non significant difference was observed between treatments using mycorrhiza and not using it.
The best result was obtained in the M3N3 treatment and then in the M3N2, M2N2 and M2N3 treatments, considering that no significant difference was observed between the characteristics of these treatments, the M2N2 treatment seems to be more economically efficient and more sustainable from the environmental aspect, it is recommended. As it was evident in the test results, no significant difference was observed between the treatments using mycorrhizal biofertilizer and not using this fertilizer. It seems that the beneficial effects of manure last longer compared to chemical fertilizers, and also some organic matter may remain in the soil over the years and its nutrients gradually enter the soil, and less damage is caused by using it, enters the environment.
Conclusion: According to the results of this research, the integrated application of manure and nitrogen fertilizer has improved the quantitative and qualitative traits in forage cactus, non significant difference was observed between the treatments of using bio-fertilizer and not using bio-fertilizer. therefore, it is recommended that the study regarding the use of mycorrhizal fungi in multi-year and long-term supplementary experiments be investigated further. The effect of year was significant only on the trait of plant height and it did not show significant results in other traits. The combination of manure and chemical fertilizer can increase vegetative growth and forage yield, because in the integrated system, the presence of some chemical fertilizer at the beginning of growth compensates for the lack of elements in the root environment, and then during the growth period, animal fertilizers release the elements required by the plant increasing the yield of fodder in the plant.
Keywords

Achieng, J.O., Ouma, G., Odhiambo, G. and Muyekho, F. 2010. Effect of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers on maize production on Alfisols and Ultisols in Kakamega, Western Kenya. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 1(4), pp.430-439. doi: 10.5251/abjna.2010.1.4.430.439
Agha Alikhani, M., Shamalizadeh, Z. and Qalavand, A. 2020. The effect of different nutritional systems (chemical, organic and integrated) on yield and quality of forage of Lathyrus sativus L. Iranian Crop Science, 1(51), pp.115-126. [In Persian]. doi:10.22059/ijfcs.2019.256660.654465
Agha Baba Dastjerdi, M., Amini Dahaghi, M., Chaichi, M.R. and Bosaghzadeh, Z. 2014. The effect of different fertilization systems on nutritative and qualitative characteristics medicine forage (Case study: alfalfa and fennel). Agricultural Crop Management, 16(1), pp.111-125. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/jag.v13i3.80079
Agyenim, B.S., Zickermann, J. and Kornahrens, M. 2006. Poultry manure effect on growth and yield of maize. West Africa Journal of Applied Ecology, 9, pp.12-18. doi: 10.4314/wajae.v9i1.45682
Albayrak, S., Turk, M., Yuksel, O. and Yilmaz, M. 2011. Forage yield and the quality of perennial legume-grass mixtures under rainfed conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 39(1), pp.114-118. doi: 10.15835/nbha3915853
Alizade, P., Fallah, S. and Raeisi, F. 2012. Potential N mineralization and availability to irrigated maize in a calcareous soil amended with organic manures and urea under field conditions. International Journal of Plant Production, 6, pp.493-512. doi: 10.22069/ijpp.2012.762
Almodares, A., Jafarinia, M. and Hadi, M.R. 2009. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on chemical compositions in corn and sweet sorghum. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 6, pp.441-446.
Arduini, I., Masoni, A., Ercoli, L. and Mariotti, M. 2006. Grain yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in durum wheat as affected by variety and seeding rate. The European Journal of Agronomy, 25, pp.309-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2006.06.009
Amirnia, R., Ghiyasi, M., Moghaddam, S.S., Rahimi, A., Damalas, C.A. and Heydarzadeh, S. 2019. Nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria plus mycorrhizal fungi improve seed yield and quality traits of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 19(3), pp.1-11. doi: 10.1007/s42729-019-00058-3
Assefa, G. and Ledin, I. 2001. Effect of variety, soil type and fertilizer on the establishment, growth, forage yield, quality and voluntary intake by cattle of oats and vetches cultivated in pure stands and mixtures. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 92, pp.95-111.
Ayub, M., Nadeem, M.A., Sharar, M.S. and Mahmood, N. 2002. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) fodder to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 1(4), pp.352-354. doi: 10.3923/ajps.2002.352.354
Baligar, V.C., Fageria, N.K. and He, Z.L. 2001. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32, pp.921-950. doi: 10.1081/css-100104098
Bingol, N.T., Karsli, M.A., Yilmaz, L.H. and Bolat, D. 2007. The effects of planting time and combination on the nutrient composition and digestible dry matter yield of four mixtures of vetch varieties intercropped with barley. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 31,pp.297-302.
Cardoso‚ M. and Kuyper‚ T.W. 2006. Mycorrhizal and tropical soil fertility. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment, 116, pp.72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.011
Carpici, E.B., Celik, N. and Bayram, G. 2010. Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by plant density and nitrogen rate. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15, pp.128-132.
Dahmardeh, M., Ghanbari, A., Siah Sar, B.A. and Ramroudi, M. 2009. Investigating the effect of planting ratio and harvesting time on the quality of corn fodder in mixed cultivation with nightly beans. Journal of Agricultural Plant Sciences of Iran, 41(3), pp.633-642. [In Persian].
Diaz, M., Rosa, A., Helies-Toussaint, C., Gueraud, F. and Negre-Salvayre, A. 2017. Opuntia spp.: Characterization and benefits in chronic diseases. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, pp.1-17. [In Persian].
Ehsanipour, A., Zinley, H. and Razmjoo, Kh. 2012. The effect of different amounts of nitrogen on yield, yield components and essential oil in different fennel masses. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, 28 (4), pp.579-593. [In Persian].
Eteng, E.U., Asawalam, D.O. and Ano, A.O. 2014. Total and available Micronutrients in soils of contrasting parent materials in Southeastern Nigeria. Journal Agricultural Biotechnology and Ecology, 7(20), pp.1-16.
Fallah, S. and Tadayyon, A. 2009. Effects of plant density and nitrogen rates on yield, nitrate and protein of silage maize. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 2(1), pp.105-121. [In Persian].
Firew, T., Kijora, C. and Peters, K.J. 2006. Study on the optimal level of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) supplementation to sheep and its contribution as source of water. Small Ruminant. Research, 72 (2–3), pp.157-164.
Ghanbari, A., Ismailian, Y. and Babaian, M. 2013. The effect of chemical and animal fertilizers on the performance of fodder, grain and the concentration of some nutrients in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Iranian Plant Ecophysiology Researches, 3(8), pp.23-36. [In Persian].
Garsid, A. 2004. Sowing time effects on the development, yield and oil of flaxseed in semi arid tropical. Australian Journal of Production Agriculture, 23, pp.607-612.
Ghasemi, A., Ghasemi, M. and Ghanbari, A. 2006. The effect of different amounts of manure and chemical mixtures on the quality and uptake of nitrogen in forage maize. Iranian Crop Science Congress, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
Ghasemi, A., Ghanbari, A., Fakheri, B.A. and Fanaei, H.R. 2018. The effect of different tillage management on forage and grain quality of corn (Zea mays.L) under the influence of different sources of organic and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 10(2), pp.490-503. [In Persian]. doi:  10.22067/jag.v10i2.59988
Haydarzadeh, S., Hassanzadeh Qort tape, A. and Rahimi, A. 2022. Investigating the effect of organic, biological and chemical fertilizers on the physiological and qualitative characteristics of lentil fodder (Lens culinaris Medik.) under rainfed conditions and supplementary irrigation. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 12(2), pp.183-198. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/ijpr.v12i2.89439
Ibrahim, H.I., Hassanen, S.A. and Hassan, E.L. 2015. Performance of forage millet in response to different combinations of organic-, inorganic-and bio-fertilizers. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(6), pp.423-431.
Iqbal, M., Ghaffar khan, A., Ul-hassan, A. and Islam, K.R. 2013. Tillage and nitrogen fertilization impact on irrigated corn yields, and soil chemical and physical properties under semi- arid climate. Journal of Sustainable Watershed Science and Management, 1(3), pp.90-98. doi: 10.5147/jswsm.v1i3.140
Iqbal, M.A., Hamid, A., Imatiz, H., Rizwan, M., Imran, M., Sheikh, U.A.A. and Saira, I. 2020. Cactus Pear: A weed of dry-lands for supplementing food security under changing climate. Planta Daninha, 38, pp.1761-1872.
Jahanzad, E., Sadeghpour, A., Hashemi, M., Keshavarz Afshar, R., Hosseini, M.B. and Barker, A.V. 2015. Silage fermentation profile, chemical composition and economic evaluation of millet and soybean grown in monocultures and as intercrops. Grass and Forage Science, 71(4), pp.584-594.
Jahanzad, E., Jorat, M., Moghadam, H., Sadeghpour, A., Chaichi, M.R. and Dashtaki, M. 2013. Response of a new and a commonly grown forage sorghum cultivar to limited irrigation and planting density. Agricultural Water Management, 117(1), pp.62-69.
Jat, R.S. and Ahlawat, I.P.S. 2006. Direct and residual effect of vermicompost, biofertilizers and phosphorus on soil nutrient dynamics and productivity of chickpea-fodder maize sequence. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 28, pp. 41-54.
Javadi, H., Saberi, M.H., Azari-Nasrabad, A. and Khosravi, S. 2010. Effect of amounts and methods of nitrogen application on yield and quality of forage sorghum (Speedfeed cv). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 8(3), pp.384-392. [In Persian].
Javadi, H., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Rashed Mohasel, M.H. and Seghatoleslami, M.J. 2018. Effect of green manure and different nitrogen levels on yield and yield components of common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 16(2), pp.317-332.
Keshavarz Afshar, R., Ansari Jovini, M., Chaichi, M.R. and Hashemi, M. 2014. Grain sorghum response to Arbuscular mycorrhiza and phosphorous fertilizer under deficit irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 106(4), pp.1212-1218.
Kevin, L., Kenneth, A., Albrecht, A., Lauer, J.G. and Riday, H. 2008. Intercropping corn with lablab bean, velvet bean and scarlet runner bean for forage. Journal Crop Science, 48, pp.371-379.
Kiani, S., Siadat, S.A., Moradi Telavat, M.R., Abdali-Mashhadi, A.R. and Sari, M. 2014. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on forage yield and of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare L.) intercropping. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16(2), pp.77-90. [In Persian].
Kume, S., Toharmat, T., Nonaka, K., Oshita, T., Nakui, T. and Ternouth, G.H. 2001. Relationships between crude protein and mineral concentrations in alfalfa and value of alfalfa silage as a mineral source for periparturient cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 93, pp.157-168.
Lauriault, L.M. and kirksey, R.E. 2004. Yield and nutritive value of irrigated winter cereal forage grass- legume intercrops in the southern high plains, USA. Agronomy Journal, 96, pp.352-358. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0352
Mc-Donald, P., Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J.F.D., Morgan, C.A., Sinclair, L.A. and Wilkinson, R. G. 2011. Animal Nutrition. 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Essex, UK, 714p.
Mohammadi, G., Safari, P.M., Ghobadi, M.E. and Najaphy, A. 2015. The effect of green manure and nitrogen fertilizer on corn yield and growth indices. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 25(2), pp.105-124. [In Persian].
Nakhaei, F. 2021. Investigation of cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as an alternative forage, especially in arid areas. Journal of Forage and Animal Feed Promotion, 2(1), pp.78-86. [In Persian].
Nejatzadeh, F. 2014. Effect of biological and chemical nitrogen fertilizers on growth, yield and essential oil composition of Dill (Anethum graveolens L.). New Cellular and-Molecular Biotechnology Journal, 19(5), pp.77-84. [In Persian].
Noorullahi, H., Solhjou, A., Karimi, A., Safdarian, M. and Hashemi, M. 2016. Effects of different levels of forage cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) in the diet on feeding performance and carcass characteristics of breeding lambs and carcass characteristics of Persian Qashqai Turkish lambs. Journal of Animal Science and Research, 21, pp.77-85. [In Persian].
Ochiai, N., Powelson, M., Crowe, F. and Dick, R. 2008. Green manure effects on soil quality in relation to suppression of Verticillium wilt of potatoes. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 44(8), pp.1013-1023.
Ochoa, M.J., Leguizamon, G. and Uhart, S.A. 2002. Effects of nitrogen availability on cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller) postharvest quality. Acta Horticultur, 581, pp.225-230.
Prystupa, P., Savin, R. and Slafer, G.A. 2004. Grain number and its relationship with dry matter, N and P in the spikes at heading in response to N×P fertilization in barley. Field Crops Research, 90, pp.245-254.
Rasby, R. and Martin, J. 2019. Understanding Feed Analysis. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Available at web:https://beef.unl.edu/learning/feedanalysis.shtml; Internet; (accessed 11 November 2019).
Rathke, G.W., Christen, O.  and Diepenbrok, W. 2005. Effect of nitrogen source and rate on productivity and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown in different crop rotations. Field Crops Research, 94, pp.103-113. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.11.010
Rezaei, M., Naghavi, M.R., Maali Amiri, R., Mohammadi, R., Jafari, A.A. and Kaboli, M.M. 2011. Evaluation of diversity in Iranian ecotypes of alfalfa using forage quality components. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 19(1), pp.39-54. [In Persian].
Rodrigues, A.M., Pitacas, F.I., Reis, C.M.G. and Blasco, M. 2016. Nutritional value of Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes from Portuguese ecotypes. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 22, pp.40-45.
Ruiz-Sanchez, M., Aroca, R., Munoz, Y., Polon, R. and Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. 2010. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances the photosynthetic efficiency and the antioxidative response of rice plants subjected to drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 167(11), pp.862-869. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.01.018
Salehi, Z., Amirnia, R., Rezaeichiyaneh, E. and Khalilvandi Behrozyar, H. 2018. Evaluation of yield and some qualitative traits of forage in intercropping of triticale with annual legumes. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 28(4), pp.59-76. [In Persian].
Saleh Baghdadi, A., Kashani, A., Golzardi, F. and Ilkayi, M.N. 2017. Integrated soil fertility management to improve maize forage yield. Journal of Agricultural Applied Research, 30(2), pp.75-90. [In Persian]. doi:  10.22092/aj.2018.109947.1141
Sarmadi, B., Rouzbehan, Y. and Rezaei, J. 2016. Influences of growth stage and nitrogen fertilizer on chemical composition, phenolics, in situ degradability and in vitro ruminal variables in amaranth forage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 215(1), pp.73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.03.007
Sayyadi Azar, Z., Javanmard, A., Shekari, F., Abbasi, A. and Amani Machiani, M. 2019. Amount of production and nutritional value of cultivated forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) with integrated application of bio and chemical fertilizers under different irrigation regims. Journal of Agroecology, 11(3), pp.1021-1035. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/jag.v11i3.71013
Scalisi, A., Morandi, B., Inglese, P. and Lo Bianco, R. 2016. Cladode growth dynamics in Opuntia ficus-indica under drought. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 122, pp.158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.10.003
Shahbazi, Kh. and Yousefi, B. 2021. Study of planting forage cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) in rehabilitation and repair of degraded tropical rangelands (Case study: Qasr Shirin rangelands of Kermanshah province). Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 74(3), pp.571-583. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/jrwm.2021.325462.1597
Slimen, I., Najar, T. and Abderrabba, M. 2016. Opuntia ficus-indica as a source of bioactive and nutritional phytochemicals. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 4, pp. 162-169. doi::10.11648/j.jfns.20160406.14
Snyman, H.A. 2013. Growth rate and water-use efficiency of cactus pears Opuntia ficus-indica and O. robusta. Arid Land Research and Management, 27(4), pp.337-348. doi: 10.1080/15324982.2013. 771232
Taheri, M., Bayat, F., Moghaddam, H. and Majnoon Hoseini, N. 2018. Effect of cover crop pre-planting and nitrogen application on some qualitative traits and yield of forage corn varieties. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 48(4), pp.997-1014. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/ijfcs.2017.140675.654019
Yusefian Ghahfarokhi, H., Abdali Mashhadi, A., Bakhshandeh, A., Lotfi, A. and Abadi, J. 2015. Evaluation of effect attract moisture substances and organic fertilizers on quality and quantity yield of Purslane (portulaca oleracea L.) in Ahwaz region. Journal of Plant Process and Function, 4(13), pp.87-96. [In Persian]. doi: 20.1001.1.23222727.1394.4.13.3.5
Yusefian Ghahfarkhi, H., Esmaili, M., Danesh Shahraki, A. and Qajar Sepanlou, M. 2021. Evaluation of organic and nitrogen fertilizers application on quality of forage of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare L.) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) under intercropping system. Journal of Agroecology, 13(3), pp.563-579. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/jag.v13i3.80079
Zegbe, J.A., Serna-Perez, A. and Mena-Covarrubias, J. 2014. Mineral nutrition enhances yield and affects fruit quality of ‘Cristalina’ cactus pear. Scientia Horticulturae, 167, pp.63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.12.023
Zamani Babgohri, J., Afyuni, M., Khoshgoftarmanesh, A.H. and Eshghizadeh, H.R. 2011. Effect of polyacryl sewage sludge, municipal compost and cow manure on soil properties and maize yield. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 14(54), pp.153-166. [In Persian]. doi: 20.1001.1.24763594.1389.14.54.11.0
Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 13
Summer 2024
Pages 467-486

  • Receive Date 06 September 2022
  • Revise Date 06 December 2022
  • Accept Date 17 January 2023