Crop Science Research in Arid Regions

Crop Science Research in Arid Regions

Effect of first irrigation time and chelate and iron Nano fertilizer application on saffron morphophysiology traits in Kermanshah

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
2 Department Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
3 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Numerous factors influence the quantity and quality of saffron. Climate and temperature are important factors in determining the time of the initial irrigation  Applying the initial irrigation at the appropriate time in each area enables the management of flowers in terms of earlier emergence than leaves, while also increasing the quantity and quality of the product and lowering harvest costs. The timing of the initial irrigation was critical for the corms to awaken. Nutrient availability, particularly microelements such as iron and zinc, is another critical factor in saffron cultivation. Iron is required for chlorophyll synthesis, while zinc is required for chlorophyll, carbohydrates, and tryptophan synthesis. Chelate micronutrients, according to researchers, are more effective than conventional compounds. The purpose of this study was to determine the response of saffron's morphophysiological characteristics to the first date of irrigation and the application of iron and zinc fertilizers in chelate and Nano-chelate forms.
Materials and Methods: This experiment was conducted in Faraman Dorod village of Kermanshah province in 2016-2017 to determine the effect of first irrigation time and chelate and Nano-chelate forms of iron and zinc fertilizers on the morpho-physiological characteristics of saffron. Split plots were used in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The first irrigation time was on November 31 Oct, 10 and 20 Nov as main plots, and chelate and Nano-chelate fertilizers were included as subplots in levels (F1, F2, and F3 at 4, 8, and 12 kg.ha-1 from iron and zinc chelate fertilizers, respectively, as well as F4, F5, and F6 at rates of 4, 8, and 12 kg.ha-1 from iron and zinc Nano-chelate fertilizers, respectively, and control (F0, without fertilizer)). SAS software, version 9.1, was used to conduct analysis of variance on the data. The Duncan test indicates that the means in each column that has at least one letter are not significantly different at the 5% probability level.
Results and Discussion: The results revealed that the first irrigation date and fertilizer had a significant impact on the number of leaves per plant, flower dry weight, stigma dry weight, crocin, picrocrocin, and chlorophylls a and b. The application of the first irrigation on 10 October resulted in the highest dry weight of flowers (0.48 g.m-2) by approximately 14.29 percent compared to the application of the first irrigation on 30 October. Under the influence of fertilizer, the application of 12 kg.ha-1 of iron and zinc Nano-chelates produced the highest flower dry weight. The application of fertilizer decreased the amount of proline, with 12 kg/ha of nano-iron and nano-zinc chelates producing the lowest levels. Under the influence of the interaction between the date of the first irrigation and the type of fertilizer, significant differences were observed between the examined treatments. According to the results, the dry weight of stigma and safranal increased with earlier irrigation dates, and the highest dry weight of stigma (236.96 mg.m-2) was obtained by applying 8 kg.ha-1 of nano-iron chelate and zinc with the first irrigation on 10 November. The highest dry weight of stigma increased by 47.56 percent when compared to the initial irrigation treatment on 30 November and no fertilizer application (160.59 mg.m-2).
Conclusion: The results showed that to obtain maximum stigma yield, 1st of November for first irrigation and the application of 12 kg.ha-1 of chelate or 8 kg.ha-1 of Nano-chelate is suitable.   
Keywords

Ahmadi, A. and Jabbari, F., 2009. Introduction to plant physiology. Vol. 1, Tehran University Press, Tehran, Iran, pp.158-163. [In Persian]
Akbarian, M.M., Heidari Sharifabad, H., Noormohammadi, G. and Darvish Kojouri, F., 2012. The effect of potassium, zinc and iron foliar application on the production of saffron (Crocus sativus). Annals of Biological Research, 3(12), pp.5651-5658.
Alizadeh, A., Sayari, N., Ahmadian, J., and Mohamadian, A., 2009. Study for zoning the most appropriate time of irrigation of saffron (Crocus Sativus L.) in Khorasan Razavi, North and Southern provinces. Journal of Water and Soil, 23(1), pp.109-118.  doi: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.1539
Amjadian, O.A., 2014. Planting saffron in Kermanshah climate condition. The first conference on new findings in the environment and agricultural ecosystems. https://AgroCongress.ir.
Arif, M., Asifshehzad, M., Bashir, F., Tasneem, M., Yasin, G., and Iqbal, M., 2012. Boron, zinc and microtone effects on growth, chlorophyll contents and yield attributes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(48), pp.10851-10858. doi: 10.5897/ajb12.393
Arnon, A.N. 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal, 23, pp.112-121.
Askary, M., Amini, F., Talebi, S.M., and Shafiei Gavari, M., 2018. Effects of Fe-chelate and iron oxide nanoparticles on some of the physiological characteristics of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 11(2), pp.449-458. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22077/escs.2017.522.1104
Baghai, N.A. and Maleki-Farahani, S., 2014. Comparison of iron chelate fertilizer with fundamentals of micro and nano on quantitative yield and allocation of Photosynthesis material of farming saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Saffron Research, 1(2), pp.156-169. [In Persian]. doi:10.22077/jsr.2013.442
Behdani, M.A., Nassiri, M., and Koocheki, A., 2004. Modeling saffron flowering time across a temperature gradient. Acta Horticulture, 650, pp.215–218. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.650.24 
Behdani, M.A., Koocheki, A., Nassiri, M., and Rezvani, P., 2005. Evaluation of quantitative relationships between saffron yield and nutrition (on farm trial). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 3(1), pp.1-14. [In Persian].  doi: 10.22067/gsc.v3i1.1287  
Bybordy, A., and Mamedov, G., 2010. Evaluation of application methods efficiency of zinc and iron for canola (Brassica napus L.). Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2(1), pp.94-103. doi: 10.15835/nsb213531
Fageria, N.K. and Baligar, V.C., 2005. Growth components and zinc recovery efficiency of upland rice genotypes. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 40, pp.1211–1215. doi: 10.1590/s0100-204x2005001200008    
Feizi, H., Hosseini, A., Sahabi, H. and Nazarian, R., 2020. Response of flower and corm yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) to nano biologic fertilizer application in comparison to current cow manure and chemical fertilizer. Saffron Agronomy & Technology, 8(1), pp.75-88. doi: 10.22048/jsat.2019.177567.1339
Ganbari-Shirsavar, A. 2019. Research interview: Investigation of production and export of Iranian saffron (Actions of the Ministry of Jihad Agriculture). Research Assistant. Political Research Office. Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. Avail: http://www.iribnews.ir [In Persian].
Gresta, F., Lombardo, G.M., Siracusa, L. and Ruberto, G., 2008. Saffron, an alternative crop for sustainable agricultural systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28, pp.95–112. doi: 10.1051/agro:2007030
Grotz, N. and Guerinot, M.L., 2006. Molecular aspects of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Biochemistry and Biophysica Acta, 763(7), pp.595-608. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.05.014
Harris. D.C., 2003. Quantitie Chemical Analysis (Ninth Edition W.H). Freeman publisher, p. 938.
INSO. 259-2. Saffron- test methods. 2013. Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian National Standardization Organization.
Jalali-Heravi, M., Parastar, H. and Ebrahimi-Najafabadi, H., 2010. Self-modeling curve resolution techniques applied to comparative analysis of volatile components of Iranian saffron from different regions. Analytica Chimica Acta, 662, pp.143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.013
Khaksarnezhad, E. and Zabet, M., 2017. The effect of Nano iron chelated on the yield and yield components of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in South Khorasan. Journal of Saffron Research, 5(1), pp.45-52. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22077/jsr.2017.600
Maleki Farahani, S. and Aghighi-Shahverdi, M., 2015. Evaluation the effect of nono-iron fertilizer in compare to iron chelate fertilizer on qualitative and quantitative yield of saffron. Journal of Crops Improvement, 17(1), pp.155-168. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/jci.2015.54795
Maleki Farahani, S., Khalesi, A. and Sharghi, Y., 2015. Effect of Nano iron chelate fertilizer on iron absorption and saffron (Crocus sativus L.) quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences, 8(2), pp.72-82. doi: 10.3923/ajbs.2015.72.82
Mohammad Abadi, A.A., Rezvani Moghaddam, P. and Fallahi, J., 2011. Effects of planting pattern and the first irrigation date on growth and yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Journal of Agroecology, 3(1), pp.84-93. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/jag.v3i1.9973
Molina, R.V., Garcìa-Luis, A., Coll, V., Ferrer, C. and Valero, M., 2004. Flower formation in the saffron Crocus (Crocus sativus L.), the role of temperature. Acta Horticulture, 650, pp.39–47. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.650.2
Osmani Roudi, H.R., Masoumi, A., Hamidi, H. and Razavi, S.A.R., 2015. Effects of first irrigation date and organic fertilizer treatments on saffron (Crocus sativus L.) yield under Khaf climatic conditions. Saffron Agronomy & Technology, 3(1), pp.25-33. doi: 10.22048/jsat.2015.9609
Rostami, M., Maleki, M. and Effati, A.R., 2018. The effect of foliar application of chemical nano-fertilizers on physiological traits of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Saffron Agronomy & Technology, 5(4), pp.345-359. doi: 10.22048/jsat.2017.54127.1160
Rostami, M., Mirzaei Talarposhti, R., Mohammadi, H. and Scott Demyan, M., 2019. Morpho-physiological response of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) to particle size and rates of zinc fertilizer. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 50(4), pp.1-8. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1614602
Rubio Moraga, A., Luis Rambla, J., Ahrazem, O., Granell, A. and Gómez-Gómez, L., 2009. Metabolite and target transcript analyses during Crocus sativus stigma development. Phytochemistry, 70, pp.1009-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.04.022
Soltani, A., 2010. Re-consideration of application of statistical methods in agricultural researches. Jahad-e-Daneshgahi Mashhad Press. 76p. [In Persian].
Volume 6, Issue 4 - Serial Number 15
Winter 2025
Pages 375-387

  • Receive Date 20 April 2022
  • Revise Date 18 June 2022
  • Accept Date 19 June 2022