Crop Science Research in Arid Regions

Crop Science Research in Arid Regions

Investigation the effect of planting distance on morphological traits, yield and yield components and quality of grain quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Science, Faculty of Bahonar Pakdasht, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran
2 Former B.Sc. Student, Production and Utilization of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Department of Agricultural Science, Faculty of Shariati, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is one of the most nutritious plants which can play an important role in human and livestock nutrition due to its unique nutritional properties. Quinoa grain is an excellent source of mineral elements such as manganese, iron, potassium, copper, zinc and phosphorus, and contains group B vitamins such as riboflavin, thiamin and niacin. Determining the optimal planting density is one of the most important effete factors to achieving optimal plant performance. Since the availability of resources needed by the plant such as light, water and nutrients is closely related to the density of plants, therefore it is very important to adjust the density of cultivation in order for the plant to optimally use the resources it needs for growth and development.
Materials and Methods: This research was carried out in order to investigate the planting density on the morphological traits, yield and yield components as well as the qualitative characteristics of quinoa grain in 2022 year as a randomized complete block design with three replications in the research farm of Department of Agricultural Science, Faculty of Bahonar, Technical and Vocational University (TVU) in province of Tehran. The experimental treatments include five different plant distances (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 cm) on fixed rows (50 cm) (10×50, 20×50, 30×50, 40×50, 50×50). Due to drip irrigation tape, the distance between the rows was fixed and 50 cm, but the distance between the plants in the cultivation rows was variable (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 cm).
After the land was prepared, the seeds were sown in heaps (5-7 seeds) at the desired intervals and immediately irrigated as drops. Irrigation intervals were done once every five days. After the seedlings reached the stage of 4-7 leaves (height about 10-15 cm), thinning was done. In the flowering stage, two plants were taken from each plot and after separating the leaves, the leaf area was measured with the help of a scanner model leaf area meter and calculated with the help of Image J program.
The grain nitrogen percentage was measured by the Kjeldahl method. Crude protein was also calculated by multiplying nitrogen percentage by 6.25 (AOAC, 2005). The amount of grain phosphorus was measured by colorimetric method (Molybdate-vanadate), grain potassium was also measured with the help of a flame photometer, and grain starch was also measured according to the method (Hedge et al., 1962). Analysis of data variance was done by SAS software (version 9.1), data comparisons were done using Duncan's multi-range test at the five percent probability level, and graphs were drawn with Excel software (2016 version).
Results and Discussion: All investigated traits were influenced by the spacing of the plants in the row. The highest plant height was observed in the treatment of 10 and 50 cm between the plants. The highest index of leaf area (903.5 square centimeters per plant), the number of side branches (18), and the length of the main cluster (37.3 cm) were observed in the 50 × 50 planting distance. The low weight of 1000 grain (2.05 g) and harvest index (28.5%) were observed in 50 × 10 treatment. The lowest and highest seed yields were obtained with 348.3 and 394 grams per square meter, respectively, in the spacing of 50 × 10 and 50 × 50, respectively. The highest percentage of seed protein and starch was observed by 19.1% and 71.6%, respectively, at the maximum distance between the plants (50 cm). The content of phosphorus and potassium of seeds (395.4 and 897.9 mg/g dry weight of grain) were also obtained at a distance of 50 cm between plants.
Conclusion: In general, according to the results obtained in the current research and the similarity of many traits measured between the 50 × 50 and 50 × 40 cm cultivation distances, it is suggested that under drip irrigation conditions with tape, the planting distance should be 50 × 40 cm.
Keywords

Abugoch, L., Castro, E., Tapia, C., Añón, M.C., Gajardo, P. and Villarroel, A., 2009. Stability of quinoa flour proteins (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during storage. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 44(10), pp.2013-2020. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02023.x
Ahanger, M.A., MoradTalab, N., Fathi Abd-Allah, E., Ahmad, P. and Hajiboland, R., 2016. Plant growth under drought stress: significance of mineral nutrients. Water stress and crop plants: a sustainable approach, First Edition. Edited by Ahmad, P. Vol. 2, pp.649-668. doi: 10.1002/9781119054450.ch37
Al Jbawi, E., Othman, M., Al Hunnish, T. and Abbas, F., 2022. The effect of plant density on growth and seed yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the middle region of Syria. International Journal of Phytology Research, 2(1), pp.19-24.
AOAC, 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Gaithersburg, MD.
Asher, A., Dagan, R., Galili, S. and Rubinovich, L., 2022. Effect of row spacing on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) growth, yield and grain quality under a mediterranean climate. Agriculture, 12(9), pp.1-12. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12091298
De Oliveira Filho, A.F., Silva, M.N.C., Innecco, R., Bezerra, F.T.C., de Abreu, W.E. and Viana, Í.E.T., 2021. Yield and viability of quinoa seeds as affected by planting arrangement. Comunicata Scientiae, 12, pp.1-8. doi: 10.14295/cs.v12.3522
Eisa, S.S., Abd El Samad, E.H., Hussin, S.A., Ali, E.A., Ebrahim, M., González, J.A., Ordano, M.A., Erazzú, L.E., El Bordeny, N.E. and Abdel-Ati, A.A., 2018. Quinoa in Egypt-plant density effects on seed yield and nutritional quality in marginal regions. Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(2), pp.515-522.
Fathi, G., 2010. Effects of plant density on yield and yield components of mung bean in Khoozestan growing conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 41(1), pp.19-27. [In Persian]. doi: 20.1001.1.20084811.1389.41.1.3.2
Fuentes, F.F., Martinez, E.A., Hinrichsen, P.V., Jellen, E.N. and Maughan, P.J., 2009. Assessment of genetic diversity patterns in Chilean quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) germplasm using multiplex fluorescent microsatellite markers. Conservation Genetics, 10(2), pp.369-377. doi: 10.1007/s10592-008-9604-3
González, J.A., Eisa, S., Hussin, S.A.E.S. and Prado, F.E., 2015. Quinoa: an Incan crop to face global changes in agriculture. Quinoa: Improvement and Sustainable Production, pp.1-18. doi: 10.1002/9781118628041.ch1
Hedge, J.E., Hofreiter, B.T. and Whistler, R.L., 1962. Carbohydrate chemistry. Academic Press, New York, 17.
Kadam, S.R., Bhale, V.M., Chorey, A.B. and Deshmukh, M.R., 2018. Influence of zinc and iron fortification on yield and post-harvest studies of different rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(1), pp.1878-1888. doi: 10.35709/ory.2023.60.2.8
Karami, R., Farajee, H., Movahedi Dehnavi, M. and khoshroo, A., 2020. Interaction of Nitrogen and Plant Density on Growth and Yield of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Crop Production, 13(1), pp.111-124. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22069/ejcp.2020.17603.2296
Khalili, S., Bastani, A., and Bagheri, M., 2019. Effect of different levels of irrigation water salinity and phosphorus on some properties of soil and quinoa plant. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 33(2), pp.155-166. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2019.119757
Kitson, R.E. and Mellon, M.G., 1944. Colorimetric determination of phosphorus as molybdivanado phosphoric acid. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition, 16(6), pp.379-383. doi: 10.1021/i560130a017
Lu, C., Li, Y., Cui, Q., Xiang, Y., Lv, W. and Wei, Z., 2022. Effects of Planting Density of Quinoa on Agronomic Characters and Yield in Chengde. Meteorological and Environmental Research, 13(5), pp.103-109. doi: 10.19547/j.issn2152-3940.2022.05.020
Najafinezhad, H., Koohi, N. and Darvishi, D., 2022. Evaluation of grain yield and quality of quinoa cultivars as affected by planting date and plant density in Jupar region of Kerman. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 53(1), pp.113-129. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/ijfcs.2021.311672.654761
Najafinezhad, H., Shakeri, P. and Amirpour Robat, M., 2021. Effect of planting Ddate and plant density on forage yield and quality of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) varieties in cold temperate region of Kerman province in Iran. Seed and Plant Journal, 36(4), pp.439-460. [In Persian].  doi: 10.22092/sppi.2021.123894
Rabbani, B., Khoramivafa, M., Saeidi, M., Bagheri, M. and Zarei, L., 2022. Study the relationship between agronomical traits and mineral elements of grain in three genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) under effect of planting date and planting density. Cereal Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 1(3), pp.390-413. [In Persian]. doi: 10.0.86.110/cbb.2022.8238.1017
Ruiz, K., Biondi, B., Oses, S.R., Acuna-Rodriguez, I.S., Antognoni, F., Martinez-Mosqueira, E.A., Coulibaly, A., Canahua-Murillo, A., Pinto, M., Zurita-Silva, A., Bazile, D., Jacobsen, S.E. and Molina-Montenegro, M.A., 2014. Quinoa biodiversity and sustainability for food security under climate change. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, pp.349–359.
Samadzadeh, A.R., Zamani, GH.R. and Fallahi, H.R., 2020. Possibility of quinoa production under South-Khorasan climatic condition as affected by planting densities and sowing dates.
Applied Research in Field Crops, 33(1), pp.82-104. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22092/aj.2020.125793.1392
Singh, D., 2019. Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd). Scientific Publishers. pp.258.
Spehar, C.R. and Rocha, J.D.S., 2009. Effect of sowing density on plant growth and development of quinoa, genotype 4.5, in the Brazilian savannah highlands. Bioscience Journal, 25(4), pp.53-58.
Stikic, R., Glamoclija, D., Demin, M., Vucelic-Radovic, B., Jovanovic, Z., Milojkovic-Opsenica, D., Jacobsen, S.E. and Milovanovic, M., 2012. Agronomical and nutritional evaluation of quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as an ingredient in bread formulations. Journal of Cereal Science, 55, pp.132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.10.010
Vahedi, M.R., Tohidi Nejad, E. and Pasandi Pour, A., 2022. Evaluation of yield and yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) in as affected by different planting densities. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 15(60), pp.593-608. [In Persian]. doi: 10.30495/jcep.2022.689808
Van Minh, N., Hoang, D.T., Van Loc, N. and Long, N.V., 2020. Effects of plant density on growth, yield and seed quality of quinoa genotypes under rain-fed conditions on red basalt soil regions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 14(12), pp.1977-1982.
Wang, N., Wang, F., Shock, C.C., Meng, C. and Qiao, L., 2020. Effects of management practices on quinoa growth, seed yield, and quality. Agronomy, 10(3), pp.1-15. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10030445
Zulkadir, G., 2021. The effects of various row spacing and sowing periods on the plant properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 19(3), pp.1857-1867. doi: dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1903.18571867      
Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 13
Summer 2024
Pages 381-394

  • Receive Date 20 June 2023
  • Revise Date 28 September 2023
  • Accept Date 15 October 2023