اثر تاریخ‌های کاشت و برداشت بر عملکرد ریشه و برخی خصوصیات کیفی چغندرقند

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمان، ایران

چکیده

انتخاب تاریخ کاشت و برداشت مناسب یکی از مهم­ترین دلایل حصول کیفیت محصول و قند خوب در چغندرقند است. با توجه به این­­که چغندرقند مرحله رسیدگی فیزیولوژیکی مشخصی مانند غلات ندارد، لذا نمی­توان تاریخ برداشت و تاریخ رسیدگی ریشه چغندر را به صورت دقیق بر اساس ظاهر مزرعه تعیین نمود. لذا به‌منظور بررسی اثر تاریخ‌های کاشت و برداشت بر عملکرد ریشه و برخی خصوصیات کیفی چغندرقند در منطقه بردسیر استان کرمان، آزمایشی بصورت اسپیلت پلات در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در چهار تکرار اجرا گردید. فاکتور اصلی تاریخ کاشت بود که در دو سطح اعمال گردید. تاریخ کاشت اول در یکم اردیبهشت‌ماه و تاریخ کاشت دوم در 15 خردادماه صورت گرفت. فاکتور فرعی نیز تاریخ برداشت بود که از اول شهریورماه و طی 9 مرحله با فاصله حدود 15 روز به‌صورت تصادفی از کرت‌های مربوطه انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که تاریخ برداشت‌های ششم، هفتم، هشتم و نهم در تاریخ کاشت اول بیشترین عملکرد ریشه را با بیش از 50 تن داشتند. تاریخ برداشت‌های اول و دوم در تاریخ کاشت دوم بیشترین میزان قند ملاس ریشه را به خود اختصاص دادند. هم­چنین تاریخ برداشت‌های ششم، هفتم، هشتم و نهم در تاریخ کاشت اول بیشترین میزان عملکرد شکر سفید را با بیش از 8 تن در هکتار به خود اختصاص دادند. لذا با توجه به خطر یخبندان پاییزه و از طرفی برنامه­ریزی جهت حمل محصول به کارخانه قند، تاریخ کاشت اول اردیبهشت و تاریخ برداشت 15 آبان‌ماه برای چغندرکاران این منطقه قابل توصیه می­باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of sowing and harvesting dates on root yield and some quality characteristics of sugar beet

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Ali Javaheri
Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Kerman, Iran
چکیده [English]


Introduction: Planting date is one of the most influential factors in determining sugar beet yield and quality. Due to its effect on the length of plant growth period, i.e. the number of growth days received by the plant, planting date has a significant impact on crop yield and is one of the most influential and decisive factors in agricultural production. The selection of the harvest date is one of the pillars of vintage quality and sugar yield in sugar beets. However, it is difficult to define the harvest date and, more precisely, the maturity date of beet roots in a precise and absolute manner. Indeed, there are various stages and degrees of maturity based on environmental and climatic conditions such as temperature, precipitation, latitude, and others. Because sugar beet lacks a distinct physiological ripening stage, similar to cereals. Due to the effect of farm management, particularly the application of planting and harvesting dates, on the yield and quality of sugar beet, it is necessary to plan carefully in order to determine the optimal planting and harvesting dates for this crop in each region. Due to the risk of autumn frost and the necessity of transport planning to the sugar factory, farm management is crucial. On the basis of this information, the first harvest date should be determined, which has a suitable and acceptable yield of white sugar, and the product should be harvested and transported to the sugar factory as soon as possible.
Materials and Methods: To determine the effect of planting and harvesting dates on root yield and certain quality characteristics of sugar beet in the Bardsir region of Kerman province, a split -plot randomized complete block experiment with four replications was conducted. The main factor was the sowing date, which was applied at two levels: The first sowing date was April 21 and the second was June 5. The sub-factor was the harvesting date, which began on August 23 and occurred in nine stages with a 15-day interval in the relevant plots.
Results and Discussion: The results revealed that the sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth harvesting dates in the first sowing date produced the highest root yield, and only in these four treatments the root yield reached more than 50 tons per hectare. The treatments of three first, second, and third harvest dates on the first sowing date and three fifth, sixth, and seventh harvest dates on the second sowing date produced the most nitrogen in the roots. The greatest amount of root molasses sugar was found in the first and second harvest dates on the second sowing date; in these treatments, the amount of root molasses sugar exceeded 5.8%. Also, the greatest amount of gross sugar was assigned to the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth harvests on the date of first sowing, and the amount of gross sugar in these five treatments exceeded 18%. In addition, the sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth harvest dates had the highest white sugar yield on the first planting date. Due to the risk of autumn frosts and, on the other hand, transport planning to the sugar factory and farm management, it is necessary to harvest immediately if the desired white sugar yield is achieved.
Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, delay in planting sugar beet increased root impurities and decreased root sugar yield and percentage. Also, with the delay in harvesting for both planting dates, root impurities decreased and the proportion of crude sugar increased, resulting in a greater disparity between molasses and crude sugar and an increase in pure sugar. Due to the risk of autumn frosts and the need to transport the crop to the sugar factory, it is recommended that beet growers in this region plant on May 1 and harvest on November 15.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bardsir
  • Molasses sugar
  • Sugar content
  • White sugar yield
Akyüz, A. and Ersus, S. 2021. Optimization of enzyme assisted extraction of protein from the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves for alternative plant protein concentrate production. Food Chemistry, 335: 127673.
Alami, L., Terouzi, W., Otmani, M., Abdelkhalek, O., Salmaoui, S. and Mbarki, M. 2021. Effect of sugar beet harvest date on its technological quality parameters by exploratory analysis. Journal of Food Quality, Volume 2021, Article ID 6639612, 8 pages.
Al-Sayed, H.M., Abd El-Razek, U.A., Sarhan, H.M. and Fateh, H.S. 2012. Effect of harvest dates on yield and quality of sugar beet varieties. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6 (9): 525-529.
Anonymous. 2020. Information bank of database and statistic of agricultural Jihad organization. Ministry of Agriculture. (In Persian).
Ashraf Mansori, Gh.R. and Sharifi, M. 2013. Effect of planting pattern on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in cold regions of Fars province. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 13: 15-26. (In Persian).
Bagheri Shirvan, M., Asadi, Gh.A. and Koochecki, A.R. 2020. Evaluation of quantity and quality characteristics of sugar beet varieties in different sowing date of direct sowing and transplanting in Shirvan and Mashhad. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 17(4): 555-565. (In Persian).
Buchholz, K., Marlander, B., Puke, H., Glattkowski, H. and Thielecke, K. 1995. Reassessment of the technical value of sugar beets. Sugar Industry, 120: 113-121.
Çakmakçi, R. and Tingir, N. 2001. The effect of the length of the vegetation period on the growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. Journal of Atatürk University in Faculty of Agriculture, 32: 41-49.
Cakmakci, R. and Oral, E. 2002. Root yield and quality of sugar beet in relation to sowing date, plant population and harvesting date interactions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 26(3): 133-139.
Carter, J.N. and Traveller, D.J. 1999. Effect of time and amonut of nitrogen uptake on sugarbeet growth and yield. Agronomy Journal, 73: 665-671.
Draycott, A.P., Durrant, M.J. and Webb, D.J. 1974. Effects of plant density, irrigation and potasium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, 82: 251-259.
Durrant, M.J., Marsh, S.J. and Jaggard, K.W. 1993. Effects of seed advancement and sowing date on establishment, bolting and yield of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, 121: 333-341.
Ebrahimi Lolayee, H. 2002. Determination of favorite harvesting date of three sugar beet varieties in Hamedan. Sugar Beet, 18(2): 131-142. (In Persian).
Feller, C. and Fink, M. 2004. Nitrate content, soluble solids content, and yield of table beet as affected by cultivar, sowing date and nitrogen supply. Horticultural Sciences, 39(6): 1255-1259.
Freckleton, R.P., Watkinson, A.R., Webb, D.J. and Thomas, T.H. 1999. Yield of sugar beet in relation to weather and nutrients. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 93(1): 39-51.
Gheybi, M. 1995. Investigation of the effect of planting and harvest time and planting arrangement on tuber yield and sugar content of sugar beet. Master Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology. (In Persian).
Hemayati, S.S., Shirzadi, M.H., Aghaeezadeh, M., Taleghani, D.F., Javaheri, M.A. and Aliashari, A. 2012. Evaluation of sowing and harvesting date effects on yield and quality of five sugar beet cultivars in Jiroft region (autumn planting). Sugar Beet, 28(1): 13-21. (In Persian).
Hosseinian, S.H., Abdollahian Noghabi, M. and Majnoon Hosseini, N. 2014. Effect of bolting on the yield and quality of two sugar beet varieties in autumn sowing area in Dezful region of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16(4): 265-277. (In Persian).
Hull, R. and Webb, D.J. 1970. The effect of sowing date and harvesting date on the yield of sugarbeet. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 75: 223-229.
ICUMSA. 2007. The determination of the polarization of sugar beet by the macerator or cold aqueous digestion method using aluminum sulphate as clarifying agent official in A. Bartens, K.G. eds. International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis. Methods Book, Berlin.
Jalilian, A. and Najafi, R. 2017. Estimation of best sowing of sugar beet using climate parameters in different areas of Kermanshah province. Journal of Sugar Beet, 33(2): 121-133. (In Persian).
Karimi, M. 2020. Management of reducing water consumption in sugar beet. Agricultural Education Publications. (In Persian).
Khajeh Poor, M.R. 2011. Industrial crops. Jihad Daneshgahi Publications of Esfahan. (In Persian).
Kiskini, A., Vissers, A., Vincken, J.P., Gruppen, H. and Wierenga, P.A. 2016. Effect of plant age on the quantity and quality of proteins extracted from sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 64(44): 8305-8314.
Koochecki, A.R. 2008. Agriculture in arid areas. Mashhad University Jihad of Publications. (In Persian).
Koochecki, A.R., Hoseini, M. and Nasiri Mahallati, M. 1997. Relationship between water and soil in crops. Mashhad University Jihad of Publications. (In Persian).
Kubadinow, N. and Wieninger, L. 1972. Determination of alpha-amino nitrogen in sugar beets and juices from sugar production. Sugar, 25: 43-47.
Lee, G.S., Dunn, G. and Schmehl, W.R. 1987. Effect of date of planting and nitrogen fertilization on growth components of sugarbeet. Journal of Sugar Beet Research, 24: 81-99.
Mobaser, A. and Piri, A. 2008. Cultivation of industrial and forage plants. Payame Noor University Publications. (In Persian).
Özturk, O., Topal, A., Akinerdem, F. and Akgun, N. 2008. Effects of sowing and harvesting dates on yield and some quality characteristics of crops in sugar beet cereal rotation system. Journal of Sciences of Food and Agriculture, 88(10): 141-150.
Pavlu, K., Chochola, J., Pulkrabek, J. and Urban, J. 2017. Influence of sowing and harvest dates on production of two different cultivars of sugar beet. Plant, Soil and Environment, 63(2): 76-81.  
Petkeviciene, B. 2009. The effects of climate factors on sugar beet early sowing timing. Agronomy Research, 7(1): 436-443.
Sadeghzadeh-hemayati, S., Shirzadi, M.H., Aghayizadeh, M., Taleghani, D., Javaheri, M.A. and Asgari, A. 2012 Effect of sowing and harvesting dates on yield and quality of five sugar beet varieties in autumn cultivation in Jiroroft. Journal of Sugar Beet, 28(1): 25-42. (In Persian).
Sadreghaen, S.H., Zarei, G. and Haghayeghei Moghaddam, A.G. 2009. Effect of sprinkler and furrow irrigation on quantity, quality and water use efficiency of sugar beet. Journal of Water and Soil, 23(1): 173-183. (In Persian).
Tomaszewska, J., Bieliński, D., Binczarski, M., Berlowska, J., Dziugan, P., Piotrowski, J., Stanishevsky, A. and Witońska, I. 2018. Products of sugar beet processing as raw materials for chemicals and biodegradable polymers. RSC Advances, 8(6): 3161-3177.
Vahidi, H., Mirshekari, B., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Rajabi, A. and Yarnia, M. 2018. Response of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet genotypes to different sowing and harvesting dates. Sugar Beet, 34(1): 1-15. (In Persian).